Prevalence and risk factors for scrotal lesions/anomalies in a cohort of Brazilian men ≥ 40 years of age

Authors

  • Frederico Ramalho Romero Instituto Curitiba de Saúde
  • Antonio Wilson Romero Instituto Curitiba de Saúde
  • Rui Manuel de Sousa Sequeira Antunes de Almeida Instituto Curitiba de Saúde
  • Fernando Cesar de Oliveira Júnior Instituto Curitiba de Saúde
  • Renato Tambara Filho Instituto Curitiba de Saúde

Keywords:

Epidemiology, Etiology [subheading], Prevalence, Risk factors, Genital diseases, male

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of and risk factors for cutaneous lesions of the scrotum and intrascrotal lesions/anomalies among men included in a prostatic cancer screening program in a Brazilian metropolitan city. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study, private outpatient healthcare service. METHODS: 1731 men aged 40 years or over, participating in a prostate cancer screening program conducted by the municipal public employees’ healthcare system, underwent systematic urological assessment by a single examiner. RESULTS: The prevalence of scrotal diseases in our sample was 44.7% (773/1731). Tinea cruris occurred in 203 (11.7%) of the participants, with higher risk among diabetics and lower prevalence among nonwhite individuals; scrotal tinea in eight (0.5%), with higher risk among hypertensive men; subcutaneous nodules in 12 (0.7%), especially in individuals with low schooling level; hydrocele in 283 (16.4%), with higher frequency among participants over the age of 60 years, diabetics or individuals with previous histories of nonspecific urethritis; spermatoceles in 174 (10.1%), with greater prevalence among individuals over the age of 60 years or diabetics, and lower frequency among individuals who underwent vasectomy; unilateral testicular hypotrophy/atrophy in 167 (9.7%) and bilateral hypotrophy/atrophy in 93 (5.4%), both occurring more frequently in individuals over the age of 60 years; absence of palpable testicles due to cryptorchidism in 7 (0.4%); and epididymitis/orchitis in 5 (0.3%), with higher prevalence among diabetics. No cases of cancer were identified in this sample. CONCLUSIONS: Scrotal diseases were highly prevalent in this population of Brazilian men.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Frederico Ramalho Romero, Instituto Curitiba de Saúde

MD, MSc, PhD, Department of Surgery, Discipline of Urology, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Antonio Wilson Romero, Instituto Curitiba de Saúde

MD. Urologist, Urology Service, Hospital Policlínica, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil.

Rui Manuel de Sousa Sequeira Antunes de Almeida, Instituto Curitiba de Saúde

MD, MSc, PhD. Coordinator, College of Medicine, Faculdade Assis Gurgacz (FAG), Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil.

Fernando Cesar de Oliveira Júnior, Instituto Curitiba de Saúde

MD, MSc, Coordinator, Núcleo de Atenção à Saúde, Instituto Curitiba de Saúde (ICS), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Renato Tambara Filho, Instituto Curitiba de Saúde

MD, MSc, PhD. Professor, Department of Surgery, Discipline of Urology, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

References

Duke GA. Common scrotal lesions. Can Fam Physician. 1983;29:1331-4.

Wampler SM, Llanes M. Common scrotal and testicular problems. Prim Care. 2010;37(3):613-26.

Kumar B, Talwar P, Kaur S. Penile tinea. Mycopathologia. 1981;75(3):169-77.

Chimelli PAV, Sofiatti AA, Nunes RS, Martins JEC. Dermatophyte agents in the city of São Paulo, from 1992 to 2002. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2003;45(5):259-63.

Romano C, Ghilardi A, Papini M. Nine male cases of tinea genitalis. Mycoses. 2005;48(3):202-4.

Dubey S, Sharma R, Maheshwari V. Scrotal calcinosis: idiopathic or dystrophic? Dermatol Online J. 2010;16(2):5.

Noël B, Bron C, Künzle N, De Heller M, Panizzon RG. Multiple nodules of the scrotum: histopathological findings and surgical procedure. A study of five cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20(6):707-10.

Rubenstein RA, Dogra VS, Seftel AD, Resnick MI. Benign intrascrotal lesions. J Urol. 2004;171(5):1765-72.

Braga C, Albuquerque MFM, Schindler HR, et al. Perfil epidemiológico da filariose linfática em crianças residentes em áreas endêmicas [Epidemiological pattern of lymphatic filariasis in children living in endemic areas]. J Pediatr (Rio J). 1997;73(2):95-100.

Bonfim C, Lessa F, Oliveira C, et al. Situação da filariose bancroftiana na Região Metropolitana do Recife: estudo em uma área endêmica no Município de Jaboatão dos Guararapes, Pernambuco, Brasil [The occurrence and distribution of lymphatic filariasis in Greater Metropolitan Recife: the case of an endemic area in Jaboatão dos Guararapes, Pernambuco, Brazil]. Cad Saude Publica. 2003; 19(5):1497-505.

Albuquerque MF, Marzochi MC, Sabroza PC, et al. Bancroftian filariasis in two urban areas of Recife, Brazil: pre-control observations on infection and disease. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995;89(4):373-7.

Rocha A, Lima G, Medeiros Z, et al. Circulating filarial antigen in the hydrocele fluid from individuals living in a bancroftian filariasis area – Recife, Brazil: detected by the monoclonal antibody Og4C3-assay. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2004;99(1):101-5.

Pepe F, Pepe P. Incidenza di patologia ecografica scrotale in 60 pazienti asintomatici di età superiore ai 70 anni [Incidence of scrotal disease diagnosed with ultrasonography in 60 asymptomatic patients over 70 years of age]. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 1994;46(2):101-3.

Mahmood T, Farooq K, Asghar J, Rashid A. Evaluation of scrotal pathology on ultrasonography. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2011;5(2):341-

Available from: http://www.pakmedinet.com/17855. Accessed in 2013 (May 15).

Wesson MB. Traumatic hydrocele: with an analysis of thirty cases. Cal West Med. 1929;31(2):127-33.

Tooke JE. Microvasculature in diabetes. Cardiovasc Res. 1996;32(4):764-71.

Edington GH. Cysts of the Epididymis. Postgrad Med J. 1936;12(127):184-91.

Vissamsetti B, O’Flynn KJ, Pearce I. Diagnosis and treatment of benign scrotal swellings. Trends in Urology & Men’s Health. 2011;2(3):27-30. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tre.200/pdf. Accessed in 2013 (May 15).

London NJ, Smart JG, Kinder RB, et al. Prospective study of routine scrotal ultrasonography in urological practice. Br J Urol. 1989;63(4):416-9.

Davis NF, McGuire BB, Mahon JA, et al. The increasing incidence of mumps orchitis: a comprehensive review. BJU Int. 2010;105(8):1060-5.

Pinto KJ, Kroovand RL, Jarow JP. Varicocele related testicular atrophy and its predictive effect upon fertility. J Urol. 1994;152(2 Pt 2):788-90.

Bujan L, Mieusset R, Mansat A, et al. Testicular size in infertile men: relationship to semen characteristics and hormonal blood levels. Br J Urol. 1989;64(6):632-7.

Handelsman DJ, Staraj S. Testicular size: the effects of aging, malnutrition, and illness. J Androl. 1985;6(3):144-51.

Hanley HG. The surgery of male subfertility; Hunterian lecture delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons of England on 24th May 1955. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1955;17(3):159-83.

Osegbe DN, Amaku EO. The causes of male infertility in 504 consecutive Nigerian patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 1985;17(4):349-58.

Trojian TH, Lishnak TS, Heiman D. Epididymitis and orchitis: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2009;79(7):583-7.

Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia. Projeto diretrizes. Afecções testiculares: diagnóstico e tratamento. Available from: http://www.projetodiretrizes.org.br/6_volume/01-AfeccoesDiagn.pdf. Accessed in 2013 (May 15).

Downloads

Published

2014-04-04

How to Cite

1.
Romero FR, Romero AW, Almeida RM de SSA de, Oliveira Júnior FC de, Tambara Filho R. Prevalence and risk factors for scrotal lesions/anomalies in a cohort of Brazilian men ≥ 40 years of age. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2014 Apr. 4 [cited 2025 Mar. 14];132(2):73-9. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1192

Issue

Section

Original Article