Initial experience at a university teaching hospital from using telemedicine to promote education through video conferencing
Keywords:
Telemedicine, Education, distance, Technology, Telecommunications, VideoconferencingAbstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Telehealth and telemedicine services are advancing rapidly, with an increasing spectrum of information and communication technologies that can be applied broadly to the population’s health, and to medical education. The aim here was to report our institution’s experience from 100 videoconferencing meetings between five different countries in the Americas over a one-year period. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective study at Universidade Estadual de Campinas. METHODS: Through a Microsoft Excel database, all conferences in all specialties held at our institution from September 2009 to August 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 647 students, physicians and professors participated in telemedicine meetings. A monthly mean of 8.3 (± 4.3) teleconferences were held over the analysis period. Excluding holidays and the month of inaugurating the telemedicine theatre, our teleconference rate reached a mean of 10.3 (± 2.7), or two teleconferences a week, on average. Trauma surgery and meetings on patient safety were by far the most common subjects discussed in our teleconference meetings, accounting for 22% and 21% of the total calls. CONCLUSION: Our experience with telemedicine meetings has increased students’ interest; helped our institution to follow and discuss protocols that are already accepted worldwide; and stimulated professors to promote telemedicine-related research in their own specialties and keep up-to-date. These high-technology meetings have shortened distances in our vast country, and to other reference centers abroad. This virtual proximity has enabled discussion of international training with students and residents, to increase their overall knowledge and improve their education within this institution.
Downloads
References
Bashshur RL. On the definition and evaluation of telemedicine. Telemed J. 1995;1(1):19-30.
Alverson DC, Edison K, Flournoy L, et al. Telehealth tools for public health, emergency, or disaster preparedness and response: a summary report. Telemed J E Health. 2010;16(1):112-4.
Ereso AQ, Garcia P, Tseng E, et al. Live transference of surgical subspecialty skills using telerobotic proctoring to remote general surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(3):400-11.
Mauer UM, Kunz U. Management of neurotrauma by surgeons and orthopedists in a military operational setting. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28(5):E10.
Huang CM, Chan E, Hyder AA. Web 2.0 and internet social networking: a new tool for disaster management? --lessons from Taiwan. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010;10:57.
Blanche PA, Bablumian A, Voorakaranam R, et al. Holographic three- dimensional telepresence using large-area photorefractive polymer. Nature. 2010;468(7320):80-3.
Jabbour P, Gonzalez LF, Tjoumakaris S, Randazzo C, Rosenwasser R. Stroke in the robotic era. World Neurosurg. 2010;73(6):603-4.
Latifi R, Stanonik Mde L, Merrell RC, Weinstein RS. Telemedicine in extreme conditions: supporting the Martin Strel Amazon Swim Expedition. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15(1):93-100.
Landers SH. Why health care is going home. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(18):1690-1.
Hede K. Teleoncology gaining acceptance with physicians, patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(20):1531-3.
García Jordá E. Telemedicine: shortening distances. Clin Transl Oncol. 2010;12(10):650-1.
Latifi R. Telepresence and telemedicine in trauma and emergency. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;131:275-80.
Hays RB, Peterson L. Options in education for advanced trainees in isolated general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 1996;25(3):362-6.
Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(11): 736-71.
Scuffham P. Systematic review of cost effectiveness in telemedicine. Quality of cost effectiveness studies in systematic reviews is problematic. BMJ. 2002;325(7364):598; author reply 598.
Rezende EJC, Melo MCB, Tavares EC, Santos AF, Souza C. Ética e telessaúde: reflexões para uma prática segura [Ethics and eHealth: reflections for a safe practice]. Rev Panam Salud Pública = Pan Am J Public Health. 2010;28(1):58-65.
Motoi K, Ogawa M, Ueno H, et al. A fully automated health-care monitoring at home without attachment of any biological sensors and its clinical evaluation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:4323-6.
Azpiroz-Leehan J, Martínez Licona F, Cadena Méndez M. Imaging Facilities for Basic Medical Units: A Case in the State of Guerrero, Mexico. J Digit Imaging. 2010. [Epub ahead of print].
Kailas A, Chong CC, Watanabe F. From mobile phones to personal wellness dashboards. IEEE Pulse. 2010;1(1):57-63.
Eron L. Telemedicine: the future of outpatient therapy? Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51 Suppl 2:S224-30.
Nakajima I. Japanese telemedical concept of ambulatory application. J Med Syst. 2011;35(2):215-20.
Haidegger T, Sándor J, Benyó Z. Surgery in space: the future of robotic telesurgery. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(3):681-90.
Machado FSN, Carvalho MAP, Mataresi A, et al. Utilização da telemedicina como estratégia de promoção de saúde em comunidades ribeirinhas da Amazônia: experiência de trabalho interdisciplinar, integrando as diretrizes do SUS [Use of telemedicine technology as a strategy to promote health care of riverside communities in the Amazon: experience with interdisciplinary work, integrating NHS guidelines]. Ciên Saúde Coletiva. 2010;15(1):247-54.
Latifi R, Hadeed GJ, Rhee P, et al. Initial experiences and outcomes of telepresence in the management of trauma and emergency surgical patients. Am J Surg. 2009;198(6):905-10.
Bulik RJ, Shokar GS. Integrating telemedicine instruction into the curriculum: expanding student perspectives of the scope of clinical practice. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(7):355-8.
