Description of color/race in Brazilian biomedical research
Keywords:
Ethnic groups, Socioeconomic factors, Public health, Health services research, Biomedical researchAbstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Over recent years, the terms race and ethnicity have been used to ascertain inequities in public health. However, this use depends on the quality of the data available. This study aimed to investigate the description of color/race in Brazilian scientific journals within the field of biomedicine. Design and Setting: Descriptive study with systematic search for scientific articles in the SciELO Brazil database. Methods: A wide-ranging systematic search for original articles involving humans, published in 32 Brazilian biomedical scientific journals in the SciELO Brazil database between January and December 2008, was performed. Articles in which the race/ethnicity of the participants was identified were analyzed. Results: In total, 1,180 articles were analyzed. The terms for describing race or ethnicity were often ambiguous and vague. Descriptions of race or ethnicity occurred in 159 articles (13.4%), but only in 42 (26.4%) was there a description of how individuals were identified. In these, race and ethnicity were used almost interchangeably and definition was according to skin color (71.4%), ancestry (19.0%) and self-definition (9.6%). Twenty-two races or ethnicities were cited, and the most common were white (37.3%), black (19.7%), mixed (12.9%), nonwhite (8.1%) and yellow (8.1%). Conclusion: The absence of descriptions of parameters for defining race, as well as the use of vague and ambiguous terms, may hamper and even prevent comparisons between human groups and the use of these data to ascertain inequities in healthcare.
Downloads
References
Bamshad M, Wooding S, Salisbury BA, Stephens JC. Deconstructing the relationship between genetics and race. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(8):598-602.
Bhopal R. Medicine and public health in a multiethnic world. J Public Health (Oxf ). 2009;31(3):315-21.
Frank R. What to make of it? The (re)emergence of a biological conceptualization of race in health disparities research. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(10):1977-83.
Ma IW, Khan NA, Kang A, Zalunardo N, Palepu A. Systematic review identified suboptimal reporting and use of race/ethnicity in general medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:572-8.
Laguardia J. O Uso da Variável “Raça” na Pesquisa em Saúde [The use of the race variable in health research]. Physis (Rio J). 2004;14(2):197-234.
Muniz YC, Ferreira LB, Mendes-Junior CT, Wiezel CEV, Simões AL. Genomic ancestry in urban Afro-Brazilians. Ann Hum Biol. 2008; 35(1):104-11.
Lee C. “Race” and “ethnicity” in biomedical research: how do scientists construct and explain differences in health? Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(6):1183-90.
Corbie-Smith G, St George DM, Moody-Ayers S, Ransohoff DF. Adequacy of reporting race/ethnicity in clinical trials in areas of health disparities. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(5):416-20.
Kaufman JS. How inconsistencies in racial classification demystify the race construct in public health statistics. Epidemiology. 1999;10(2):101-3.
Comstock RD, Castillo EM, Lindsay SP. Four year review of the use of race and ethnicity in epidemiologic and public health research. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(6):611-9.
