The effect of poverty on developmental screening scores among infants
Keywords:
Child development, Socioeconomic factors, Poverty, Primary health care, InfantAbstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Child development is negatively influenced by multiple risk factors associated with poverty, thus indicating the importance of identifying the most vulnerable groups within populations that are apparently homogeneous regarding their state of socioeconomic deprivation. This study aimed to identify different levels of poverty in a population of low socioeconomic condition and to ascertain their influence on infants’ neuropsychomotor development. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study conducted at four Family Health Units in the Health District IV in the city of Recife, Brazil. METHODS: The sample comprised 136 infants aged 9 to 12 months, which represented 86% of all the infants in this age group, registered at the units studied. Socioeconomic status was assessed through a specific index and child development through the Bayley III screening test. RESULTS: Around 20% of the families were in the lowest quartile of the socioeconomic level index and these presented the highest frequency of infants with suspected delay in receptive communication. Maternal and paternal unemployment negatively influenced receptive communication and cognition, respectively. Not possessing a cell phone (a reflection of low socioeconomic status) was associated with worse cognitive performance and gross motricity. Male infants showed a higher frequency of suspected delay in receptive communication. CONCLUSIONS: Infants of more precarious socioeconomic status more frequently present suspected developmental delay. Development monitoring and intervention programs should be encouraged for this subgroup, thereby providing these children with a better chance of becoming productive citizens in the future.
Downloads
References
Williams J, Holmes CA. Improving the early detection of children with subtle developmen- tal problems. J Child Health Care. 2004;8(1):34-46.
Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, et al. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet. 2007;369(9555):60-70.
Andraca I, Pino P, La Parra A, Rivera F, Castillo M. Factores de riesgo para el desarollo psicomotor en lactantes nacidos en óptimas condiciones biológicas [Risk factors for psychomotor development among infants born under optimal biological conditions]. Rev Saúde Pública = J Public Health. 1998;32(2):138-47.
Lima MC, Eickmann SH, Lima ACV, et al. Determinants of mental and motor development at 12 months in a low income population: a cohort study in northeast Brazil. Acta Paedia- tr. 2004;93(7):969-75.
Walker SP, Wachs TD, Gardner JM, et al. Child development: risk factors for adverse outco- mes in developing countries. Lancet. 2007;369(9556):145-57.
Guo G, Harris KM. The mechanisms mediating the effects of poverty on children’s intellec- tual development. Demography. 2000;37(4):431-47.
Bradley RH, Corwyn RF. Socioeconomic status and child development. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:371-99.
Chilton M, Chyatte M, Breaux J. The negative effects of poverty & food insecurity on child development. Indian J Med Res. 2007;126(4):262-72.
Miller JE. Developmental screening scores among preschool-aged children: the roles of poverty and child health. J Urban Health. 1998;75(1):135-52.
Najman JM, Aird R, Bor W, et al. The generational transmission of socioeconomic inequa- lities in child cognitive development and emotional health. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(6): 1147-58.
Evans GW. Child development and the physical environment. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:423-51.
Evans GW, Kim P. Childhood poverty and health: cumulative risk exposure and stress dysregulation. Psychol Sci. 2007;18(11):953-7.
Dearing E. Psychological costs of growing up poor. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136: 324-32.
Duncan GJ, Brooks-Gunn J, Klebanov PK. Economic deprivation and early childhood deve- lopment. Child Dev. 1994;65(2 Spec No):296-318.
Eickmann SH, Lima AC, Guerra MQ, et al. Improved cognitive and motor development in a community-based intervention of psychosocial stimulation in northeast Brazil. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45(8):536-41.
Sameroff AJ, Seifer R. Familial risk and child competence. Child Dev. 1983;54(5): 1254-68.
Issler RMS, Giugliani ERJ. Identificação de grupos mais vulneráveis à desnutrição in- fantil pela medição do nível de pobreza [Identification of the groups most vulne- rable to infant malnutrition through the measuring of poverty level]. J Pediatr (Rio J). 1997;73(2):101-5.
Prefeitura do Recife. Secretaria de Saúde. Distrito Sanitário IV. Available from: http:// www.recife.pe.gov.br/2007/07/04/mat_144847.php. Accessed in 2010 (Aug 23).
Prefeitura do Recife. Secretaria de Saúde. Plano Municipal de Saúde 2006-2009 (apro-vado na 7a Conferência Municipal de Saúde). Recife saudável: inclusão social e qualida- de no SUS. Recife: Conferência Municipal de Saúde. Recife; 2005. Available from: www. recife.pe.gov.br/noticias/arquivos/227.pdf. Accessed in 2010 (Aug 11).
Alvarez ML, Muzzo S, Ivanovic D. Escala para medición del nível socioeconómico, en el área de la salud [Scale for measurement of socioeconomic level, in the health area]. Rev Med Chile. 1985;113(3):243-9.
World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995.
Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant and toddler development. 3th ed. Screening test manual. Oxford: PsychCorp; 2006.
Hess CR, Papas MA, Black MM. Use of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener with an environmental risk group. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004;29(5):321-30.
Barros KMFT, Fragoso AGC, Oliveira ALB, Cabral Filho JE, Castro RM. Do environmental influences alter motor abilities acquisition? A comparison among children from day-care centers and private schools. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003;61(2A):170-5.
Halpern R, Giugliani ERJ, Victora CG, Barros FC, Horta BL. Fatores de risco para suspei- ta de atraso no desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor aos 12 meses de vida [Risk factors for suspicion of developmental delay at 12 months old]. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2002;73(5): 529-39.
Hoff E. The specificity of environmental influence: socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Dev. 2003;74(5):1368-78.
Garret P, Ng’andu N, Ferron J. Poverty experiences of young children and the quality of their home environments. Child Dev. 1994;65(2 Spec No):331-45.
Andrade SA, Santos DN, Bastos AC, et al. Ambiente familiar e desenvolvimento cognitivo infantil: uma abordagem epidemiológica [Family environment and child’s cognitive deve- lopment: an epidemiological approach]. J Public Health. 2005;39(4):606-11.
Santos-Monteiro J, Guedes RCA, Castro RM, Cabral Filho JE. Estimulação psicossocial e plasticidade cerebral em desnutridos [Psychosocial stimulation and brain plasticity in malnourished individuals]. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant. 2002;2(1):15-22.
Walker SP, Chang SM, Powell CA, Grantham-McGregor SM. Effects of early childhood psycho- social stimulation and nutritional supplementation on cognition and education in growth- stunted Jamaican children: prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2005;366(9499):1804-7.
Grantham-McGregor SM, Lira PI, Ashworth A, Morris SS, Assunção AM. The development of low birth weight term infants and the effects of the environment in northeast Brazil. J Pediatr. 1998;132(4):661-6.
Developmental surveillance and screening of infants and young children. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):192-6.
Drachler ML. Medindo o desenvolvimento infantil em estudos epidemiológicos: dificulda- des subjacentes. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2000;76(6):401-3.
Mello DF, Lima RAG, Scochi CGS. Health follow-up of children in poverty situation: betwe- en the routine and eventuality of daily care. Rev Latinoam Enferm. 2007;15(spe):820-7.
