Scar endometrioma following obstetric surgical incisions

retrospective study on 33 cases and review of the literature

Authors

  • Guilherme Karam Corrêa Leite Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva
  • Luis Fernando Pina de Carvalho Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva
  • Henri Korkes Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva
  • Thiago Falbo Guazzelli Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva
  • Grecy Kenj Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva
  • Arildo de Toledo Viana Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva

Keywords:

Endometriosis, Cicatrix, Cesarean section, Postoperative complications, Treatment outcome

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The incidence of scar endometrioma ranges from 0.03 to 3.5%. Certain factors relating to knowledge of the clinical history of the disease make correct diagnosis and treatment difficult. The aim here was to identify the clinical pattern of the disease and show surgical results. The literature on this topic was reviewed. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective descriptive study at Hospital Municipal Maternidade - Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva. METHODS: Data from the medical records of patients with preoperative diagnoses of scar endometrioma who underwent operations between 2001 and 2007 were surveyed and reviewed. The postoperative diagnosis came from histopathological analysis. The main information surveyed was age, obstetric antecedents, symptoms, tumor location, size and palpation, duration of complaint, diagnosis and treatment. All patients underwent tumor excision with a safety margin. RESULTS: There were 33 patients, of mean age 30.1 ± 5.0 years (range: 18-41 years). The total incidence was 0.11%: 0.29% in cesarean sections and 0.01% in vaginal deliveries. Twenty-nine tumors (87.9%) were located in cesarean scars, two (6.0%) in episiotomy scars and two (6.0%) in the umbilical region. The main symptom was localized cyclical pain (66.7%), of mean duration 30.5 months (± 23). Surgical treatment was successful in all cases. CONCLUSION: This is an uncommon disease. The most important diagnostic characteristic is coincidence of painful symptoms with menstruation. Patients undergoing cesarean section are at greatest risk: relative risk of 27.37 (P < 0.01). The surgical treatment of choice is excision of the endometrioma with a safety margin.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Guilherme Karam Corrêa Leite, Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva

Resident in gynecology and obstetrics, Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Luis Fernando Pina de Carvalho, Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva

Resident in gynecology and obstetrics, Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Henri Korkes, Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva

Resident in gynecology and obstetrics, Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Thiago Falbo Guazzelli, Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva

Resident in gynecology and obstetrics, Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Grecy Kenj, Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva

MD. Attending physician in gynecology and obstetrics, Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Arildo de Toledo Viana, Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva

MD, PhD. Associate full professor and coordinator of the Discipline of Surgical Technique, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, and scientific-technical coordinator of Clinical Surgery, Hospital Municipal Maternidade-Escola Dr. Mário de Moraes Altenfelder Silva, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

References

Jubanyik KJ, Comite F. Extrapelvic endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1997;24(2):411-40.

Cárdenas-Lailson L, Berlanga-Ramírez F, Athié-Athié A, Gonzáles-Parada F, Villanueva-Egan

L. Endometrioma de pared abdominal: Características clínicas y resultados Del tratamiento quirúrgico [Abdominal wall endometrioma: clinical characteristics and results of surgical tre- atment]. Cirujano General. 2002;24(4):295-9. Available from: http://www.medigraphic.com/ingles/i-htms/i-cirgen/i-cg2002/i-cg02-4/im-cg024h.htm. Accessed in 2009 (Oct 21).

Kaunitz A, Di Sant’Agnese PA. Needle tract endometriosis: an unusual complication of am- niocentesis. Obstet Gynecol. 1979;54(6):753-5.

Ducarme G, Uzan M, Poncelet C. Endometriosis mimicking hernia recurrence. Hernia. 2007;11(2):175-7.

Delicata RJ, Clark GW, Roy MK, Shaw RW, Carey PD. Presentation of endometriosis to general surgeons: a 10 year experience. Br J Surg. 1996;83(5):711.

Nominato NS, Prates LFVS, Lauar I, Morais J, Maia L, Geber S. Endometriose de cicatriz cirúrgica: estudo retrospective de 72 casos [Scar endometriosis: a retrospective study of 72 patients]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2007;29(8):423-7.

Meirelles M, Losano R, Viana AT. Endometrioma de cicatriz: estudo de 14 casos [Scar en- dometriosis: study of 14 cases]. Arq Med Hosp Fac Cienc Med Santa Casa São Paulo. 2005;50(3):92-6. Available from: http://intranet.fcmscsp.edu.br/files/file/vlm50n32.pdf. Accessed in 2009 (Oct 20).

Esquivel-Estrada V, Briones-Garduño JC, Mondragón-Ballesteros R. Implante de endome- triosis en cicatriz de operación cesárea. Cirugía e Cirujanos. 2004;72(2):113-5. Available from: http://www.medigraphic.com/espanol/e-htms/e-circir/e-cc2004/e-cc04-2/em-cc042g.htm. Accessed in 2009 (Oct 20).

Higginbottom J. Termination of pregnancy by abdominal hysterotomy. Lancet. 1973; 1(7809):937-8.

Chatterjee SK. Scar endometriosis: a clinicopathologic study of 17 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1980;56(1):81-4.

Gunes M, Kayikcioglu F, Ozturkoglu E, Haberal A. Incisional endometriosis after cesarean section, episiotomy and other gynecologic procedures. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005;31(5): 471-5.

Picod G, Boulanger L, Bounoua F, Leduc F, Duval G. Endométriose pariétale sur cicatrice de césarienne: à propos de 15 cas [Abdominal wall endometriosis after caesarean section: report of fifteen cases]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006;34(1):8-13.

Kocakusak A, Arpinar E, Arikan S, Demirbag N, Tarlaci A, Kabaca C. Abdominal wall endome- triosis: a diagnostic dilemma for surgeons. Med Princ Pract. 2005;14(6):434-7.

Ding DC, Hsu S. Scar endometriosis at the site of cesarean section. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;45(3):247-9.

Purvis RS, Tyring SK. Cutaneous and subcutaneous endometriosis. Surgical and hormonal therapy. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994;20(10):693-5.

Wicherek L, Klimek M, Skret-Magierlo J, et al. The obstetrical history in patients with Pfannenstiel scar endometriomas--an analysis of 81 patients. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2007;63(2):107-13.

Minaglia S, Mishell DR Jr, Ballard CA. Incisional endometriomas after Cesarean section: a case series. J Reprod Med. 2007;52(7):630-4.

de Oliveira MA, de Leon AC, Freire EC, de Oliveira HC, Study SO. Risk factors for abdominal scar endometriosis after obstetric hysterotomies: a case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(1):73-80.

Xiang Y, Lang J, Wang Y, Huang R, Lian L. Abdominal scar endometriosis: report of 28 cases. Chin Med Sci J. 1995;10(3):188-90.

Rani PR, Soundararaghavan S, Rajaram P. Endometriosis in abdominal scars--review of 27 cases. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1991;36(3):215-8.

Hensen JH, Van Breda Vriesman AC, Puylaert JB. Abdominal wall endometriosis: clinical presentation and imaging features with emphasis on sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(3):616-20.

Victory R, Diamond MP, Johns DA. Villar’s nodule: a case report and systematic literature review of endometriosis externa of the umbilicus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(1): 23-32.

De Falco M, Ragusa M, Oliva G, et al. Endometriosi esterna: patologia di esclusivo interesse ginecologico? Il punto di vista del chirurgo generale [Is extrauterine endometriosis confined to the gynecological sphere? A critical review of the experience in a general surgery unit]. G Chir. 2007;28(3):83-92.

Majeski J, Craggie J. Scar endometriosis developing after an umbilical hernia repair with mesh. South Med J. 2004;97(5):532-4.

Ridley JH, Edwards IK. Experimental endometriosis in the human. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1958;76(4):783-90; discussion 789-90.

Steck WD, Helwig EB. Cutaneous endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1966;9(2):373-83.

Wicherek L, Dutsch-Wicherek M, Galazka K, et al. Comparison of RCAS1 and metallothio- nein expression and the presence and activity of immune cells in human ovarian and abdo- minal wall endometriomas. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;4:41.

Nirula R, Greaney GC. Incisional endometriosis: an underappreciated diagnosis in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190(4):404-7.

Whitfield RJ, Worley PJ, Hughes CD. Gs26p abdominal wall endometrioma following caesa- rean section. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2007;77 Suppl 1:A31. Available from: http://www.la-bmeeting.com/paper/27575713/whitfield-2007-gs26p-abdominal-wall-endometrioma-following-caesarean-section. Accessed in 2009 (Oct 20).

Wolf Y, Haddad R, Werbin N, Skornick Y, Kaplan O. Endometriosis in abdominal scars: a diagnostic pitfall. Am Surg. 1996;62(12):1042-4.

Dwivedi AJ, Agrawal SN, Silva YJ. Abdominal wall endometriomas. Dig Dis Sci. 2002;47(2): 456-61.

Aydin O. Scar endometriosis - a gynaecologic pathology often presented to the general surgeon rather than the gynaecologist: report of two cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007; 392(1):105-9.

Dosal M, Guzmán GF, Medina GS. Endometrioma en pared abdominal: informe de cuatro pacientes [Endometrioma in the abdominal wall: Report on four patients]. Cirujano Gene- ral. 2002;24(2):148-50. Available from: http://www.medigraphic.com/espanol/e-htms/e-cirgen/e-cg2002/e-cg02-2/em-cg022j.htm. Accessed in 2009 (Oct 21).

Gajjar KB, Mahendru AA, Khaled MA. Cesarean scar endometriosis presenting as an acute ab- domen: a case report and review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;277(2):167-9.

Liang CC, Liou B, Tsai CC, Chen TC, Soong YK. Scar endometriosis. Int Surg. 1998;83(1): 69-71.

Sergent F, Baron M, Le Cornec JB, Scotté M, Mace P, Marpeau L. Transformation maligne d’une endométriose pariétale [Malignant transformation of abdominal wall endometriosis: a new case report]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006;35(2):186-90.

Chene G, Darcha C, Dechelotte P, Mage G, Canis M. Malignant degeneration of perineal en- dometriosis in episiotomy scar, case repot and review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17(3):709-14.

Balleyguier C, Chapron C, Chopin N, Hélénon O, Menu Y. Abdominal wall and surgical scar endometriosis: results of magnetic resonance imaging. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2003; 55(4):220-4.

Barisic GI, Krivokapic ZV, Jovanovic DR. Perineal endometriosis in episiotomy scar with anal sphincter involvement: report of two cases review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(6):646-9.

Kokuba EM, Sabino NM, Sato H, Aihara AY, Schor E, Ferreira LM. Reconstruction technique for umbilical endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;94(1):37-40.

Wasfie T, Gomez E, Seon S, Zado B. Abdominal wall endometrioma after cesarean section: a preventable complication. Int Surg. 2002;87(3):175-7.

Downloads

Published

2009-09-09

How to Cite

1.
Leite GKC, Carvalho LFP de, Korkes H, Guazzelli TF, Kenj G, Viana A de T. Scar endometrioma following obstetric surgical incisions: retrospective study on 33 cases and review of the literature. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2009 Sep. 9 [cited 2025 Mar. 9];127(5):270-7. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1898

Issue

Section

Original Article