Prevalence of chimerism after non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Authors

  • Azulamara da Silva Ruiz Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina
  • Maria de Lourdes Ferrari Chauffaille Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina
  • Solivanda Trindade Alves Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina
  • José Salvador Rodrigues de Oliveira Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina

Keywords:

Variable number of tandem repeats, Hematologic neoplasms, Bone marrow transplantation, In situ hybridization, fluorescence, Chimerism, Leukemia

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (NMA-HSCT) is performed in onco-hematological patients who cannot tolerate ablative conditioning because of older age or comorbidities. This approach does not completely eliminate host cells and initially results in mixed chimerism. Long-term persistence of mixed chimerism results in graft rejection and relapse. Involvement of graft-versus-host disease is concomitant with complete chimerism and graft-versus-tumor effect. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of chimerism in onco-hematological patients who underwent NMA-HSCT. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational clinical study on chimerism status after human leukocyte antigen-identical NMA-HSCT at the Discipline of Hematology and Hemotherapy of Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: We sequentially analyzed the amplification of APO-B, D1S80, DxS52, FVW, 33.6, YNZ-2 and H-ras primers using variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) on 17 pairs and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with the XY probe and SRY primer on 13 sex-unmatched pairs. RESULTS: The informativeness of the primers using VNTR was 60% for APO-B, 75% D1S80, 36% DxS52, 14% FVW, 40% YNZ-22 and 16% H-ras. The SRY primer was informative in female receptors with male donors. The XY-FISH method was informative in 100% of the sex-unmatched pairs. CONCLUSION: These methods were sensitive and informative. In VNTR, the association of APO-B with D1S80 showed 88% informativeness. The quantitative FISH method was more sensitive, but had the disadvantage of only being used for sex-unmatched pairs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Azulamara da Silva Ruiz, Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina

BSc. Postgraduate student, Division of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina (Unifesp-EPM), São Paulo, Brazil.

Maria de Lourdes Ferrari Chauffaille, Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina

MD, PhD. Associate professor, Department of Medicine. Division of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina (UnifespEPM), São Paulo, Brazil.

Solivanda Trindade Alves, Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina

MD. Physician in the Division of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Hospital Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, Brazil.

José Salvador Rodrigues de Oliveira, Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina

MD, PhD. Associate professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina (Unifesp-EPM); and coordinator of the Division of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Hospital Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, Brazil.

References

Sreenan JJ, Pettay JD, Tbakhi A, et al. The use of amplified variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) in the detection of chimerism following bone marrow transplantation. A comparison with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) by Southern blotting. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;107(3):292-8.

Antin JH, Childs R, Filipovich AH, et al. Establishment of complete and mixed donor chi- merism after allogeneic lymphohematopoietic transplantation: recommendations from a workshop at the 2001 Tandem Meetings of the International Bone Marrow Transplant Re- gistry and the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2001;7(9):473-85.

Talwar S, Khan F, Nityanand S, Agrawal S. Chimerism monitoring following allogeneic hema- topoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;39(9):529-35.

Ariffin H, Daud SS, Mohamed Z, Ibrahim K, Lee TF, Chong LA. Evaluation of two short tan- dem repeat multiplex systems for post-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation chimerism analysis. Singapore Med J. 2007;48(4):333-7.

Mackinnon S, Papadopoulos EB, Carabasi MH, et al. Adoptive immunotherapy evaluating escalating doses of donor leukocytes for relapse of chronic myeloid leukemia after bone marrow transplantation: separation of graft-versus-leukemia responses from graft-versus- host disease. Blood. 1995;86(4):1261-8.

Khan F, Agarwal A, Agrawal S. Significance of chimerism in hematopoietic stem cell trans- plantation: new variations on an old theme. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004;34(1):1-12.

Hibi S, Tsunamoto K, Todo S, et al. Chimerism analysis on mononuclear cells in the CSF after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997;20(6): 503-6.

Dewald G, Stallard R, Al Saadi A, et al. A multicenter investigation with interphase fluo- rescence in situ hybridization using X- and Y-chromosome probes. Am J Med Genet. 1998;76(4):318-26.

Lui YY, Chik KW, Chiu RW, Ho CY, Lam CW, Lo YM. Predominant hematopoietic origin of cell- free DNA in plasma and serum after sex-mismatched bone marrow transplantation. Clin Chem. 2002;48(3):421-7.

Sufliarska S, Minarik G, Horakova J, et al. Establishing the method of chimerism monito- ring after allogeneic stem cell transplantation using multiplex polymerase chain reaction amplification of short tandem repeat markers and Amelogenin. Neoplasma. 2007;54(5): 424-30.

Koldehoff M, Steckel NK, Hlinka M, Beelen DW, Elmaagacli AH. Quantitative analysis of chimerism after allogeneic stem cell transplantation by real-time polymerase chain reac- tion with single nucleotide polymorphisms, standard tandem repeats, and Y-chromosome- specific sequences. Am J Hematol. 2006;81(10):735-46.

McSweeney PA, Storb R. Mixed chimerism: preclinical studies and clinical applications. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 1999;5(4):192-203.

Storb R, Yu C, Zaucha JM, et al. Stable mixed hematopoietic chimerism in dogs given donor antigen, CTLA4Ig, and 100 cGy total body irradiation before and pharmacologic immunosu- ppression after marrow transplant. Blood. 1999;94(7):2523-9.

Bosi A, Bartolozzi B, Guidi S. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2005;37(6):2667-9.

Giralt S. Allografting older patients--myths and realities. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15(1 Suppl):146-8.

Khouri IF, Keating M, Körbling M, et al. Transplant-lite: induction of graft-versus-malignancy using fludarabine-based nonablative chemotherapy and allogeneic blood progenitor- cell transplantation as treatment for lymphoid malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(8): 2817-24.

Slavin S, Nagler A, Naparstek E, et al. Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation and cell therapy as an alternative to conventional bone marrow transplantation with lethal cytore- duction for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases. Blood. 1998;91(3):756-63.

Slavin S. New strategies for bone marrow transplantation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2000;12(5):542-51.

Tsirigotis P, Bitan RO, Resnick IB, et al. A non-myeloablative conditioning regimen in allo- geneic stem cell transplantation from related and unrelated donors in elderly patients. Haematologica. 2006;91(6):852-5.

Martinelli G, Trabetti E, Farabegoli P, et al. Early detection of bone marrow engraftment by amplification of hypervariable DNA regions. Haematologica. 1997;82(2):156-60.

Smith AG, Martin PJ. Analysis of amplified variable number tandem repeat loci for eva- luation of engraftment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Rev Immunogenet. 1999;1(2):255-64.

Kraus G, Geffin R, Spruill G, et al. Cross-clade inhibition of HIV-1 replication and cytopa- thology by using RNase P-associated external guide sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(6):3406-11.

Richards B, Heilig R, Oberlé I, Storjohann L, Horn GT. Rapid PCR analysis of the St14 (DXS52) VNTR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19(8):1944.

Siva SC, Johnson SI, McCracken SA, Morris JM. Evaluation of the clinical usefulness of isolation of fetal DNA from the maternal circulation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;43(1):10-5.

Stuppia L, Calabrese G, Di Bartolomeo P, et al. Retrospective investigation of hematopoietic chimerism after BMT by PCR amplification of hypervariable DNA regions. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1995;85(2):124-8.

Peake IR, Bowen D, Bignell P, et al. Family studies and prenatal diagnosis in severe von Wil- lebrand disease by polymerase chain reaction amplification of a variable number tandem repeat region of the von Willebrand factor gene. Blood. 1990;76(3):555-61.

Ugozzoli L, Yam P, Petz LD, et al. Amplification by the polymerase chain reaction of hyperva- riable regions of the human genome for evaluation of chimerism after bone marrow trans- plantation. Blood. 1991;77(7):1607-15.

Boerwinkle E, Xiong WJ, Fourest E, Chan L. Rapid typing of tandemly repeated hypervariable loci by the polymerase chain reaction: application to the apolipoprotein B 3’ hypervariable region. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(1):212-6.

Budowle B, Chakraborty R, Giusti AM, Eisenberg AJ, Allen RC. Analysis of the VNTR locus D1S80 by the PCR followed by high-resolution PAGE. Am J Hum Genet. 1991;48(1): 137-44.

Hassan R, Bonamino MH, Braggio E, et al. A systematic approach to molecular quantitative determination of mixed chimaerism following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: an analysis of its applicability in a group of patients with severe aplastic anaemia. Eur J Hae- matol. 2004;73(3):156-61.

Muniz ES, Plassa F, Amselem S, Goossens M, Vernant JP. Molecular analysis of polymorphic loci to study chimerism after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Heteroduplex analysis in denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis: a new approach to detecting residual host cells. Transplantation. 1994;57(3):451-6.

van Leeuwen JE, van Tol MJ, Bodzinga BG, et al. Detection of mixed chimaerism in flow- sorted cell subpopulations by PCR-amplified VNTR markers after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Br J Haematol. 1991;79(2):218-25.

Downloads

Published

2009-09-09

How to Cite

1.
Ruiz A da S, Chauffaille M de LF, Alves ST, Oliveira JSR de. Prevalence of chimerism after non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2009 Sep. 9 [cited 2025 Mar. 9];127(5):251-8. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1908

Issue

Section

Original Article