Oral drugs for hypertensive urgencies

systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

  • Luciana Mendes Souza Brazilian Cochrane Center
  • Rachel Riera Brazilian Cochrane Center
  • Humberto Saconato Brazilian Cochrane Center
  • Adriana Demathé Brazilian Cochrane Center
  • Álvaro Nagib Atallah Brazilian Cochrane Center

Keywords:

Hypertension, Review [Publication Type], Antihypertensive agents, Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, Calcium channel blockers

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Hypertensive urgencies are defined as severe elevations in blood pressure without evidence of acute or progressive target-organ damage. The need for treatment is considered urgent but allows for slow control using oral or sublingual drugs. If the increase in blood pressure is not associated with risk to life or acute target-organ damage, blood pressure control must be implemented slowly over 24 hours. For hypertensive urgencies, it is not known which class of antihypertensive drug provides the best results and there is controversy regarding when to use antihypertensive drugs and which ones to use in these situations. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of oral drugs for hypertensive urgencies. METHODS: This systematic review of the literature was developed at the Brazilian Cochrane Center, and in the Discipline of Emergency Medicine and Evidence-Based Medicine at the Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina (Unifesp-EPM), in accordance with the methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration. RESULTS: Sixteen randomized clinical trials including 769 participants were selected. They showed that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors had a superior effect in treating hypertensive urgencies, evaluated among 223 participants. The commonest adverse event for calcium channel blockers were headache (35/206), flushing (17/172) and palpitations (14/189). For angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, the principal side effect was bad taste (25/38). CONCLUSIONS: There is important evidence in favor of the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for treating hypertensive urgencies, compared with calcium channel blockers, considering the better effectiveness and the lower frequency of adverse effects (like headache and flushing).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luciana Mendes Souza, Brazilian Cochrane Center

MD. Postgraduate (MSc) student in the Discipline of Emergency Medicine and Evidence-Based Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina (UnifespEPM), São Paulo, Brazil.

Rachel Riera, Brazilian Cochrane Center

MD, MSc. Research assistant in the Brazilian Cochrane Center and physician in the Discipline of Emergency Medicine and Evidence-Based Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina (Unifesp-EPM), São Paulo, Brazil.

Humberto Saconato, Brazilian Cochrane Center

MD, MSc, PhD. Assistant professor in the Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

Adriana Demathé, Brazilian Cochrane Center

MD, MSc. Postgraduate (PhD) student in the Department of Pathology and Propaedeutics, Universidade Estadual de São Paulo (Unesp), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.

Álvaro Nagib Atallah, Brazilian Cochrane Center

MD, MSc, PhD. Full professor and Head of the Discipline of Emergency Medicine and Evidence-Based Medicine of Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina (Unifesp-EPM), and Director of the Brazilian Cochrane Center, São Paulo, Brazil.

References

Blumenfeld JD, Laragh JH. Management of hypertensive crises: the scientific basis for treat- ment decisions. Am J Hypertens. 2001;14(11 Pt 1):1154-67.

Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Commit- tee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560-72.

Cherney D, Straus S. Management of patients with hypertensive urgencies and emergencies: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(12):937-45.

Varon J, Marik PE. The diagnosis and management of hypertensive crises. Chest. 2000;118(1):214-27.

Abdelwahab W, Frishman W, Landau A. Management of hypertensive urgencies and emer- gencies. J Clin Pharmacol. 1995;35(8):747-62.

Perez MI, Musini VM. Pharmacological interventions for hypertensive emergencies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(1):CD003653.

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Saúde Brasil 2006: uma análise da desigualdade em saúde [Bra- zilian health 2006: an analysis of health inequalities]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2006.

Zampaglione B, Pascale C, Marchisio M, Cavallo-Perin P. Hypertensive urgencies and emer- gencies. Prevalence and clinical presentation. Hypertension. 1996;27(1):144-7.

Vidt DG. Emergency room management of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2001;3(3):158-64.

Shayne PH, Pitts SR. Severely increased blood pressure in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(4):513-29.

Rynn KO, Hughes FL, Faley B. An emergency department approach to drug treatment of hypertensive urgency and emergency. Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2005;18(5):363-76. Available from: http://online.sagepub.com/cgi/searchresults?fulltext=drugtreatmentofhypertensiveurgencyandemergency&src=hw&andorexactfulltext=and. Accessed in 2009 (Nov 26).

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1-12.

Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Available from: http://www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/Handbook4.2.6Sep2006.pdf. Accessed in 2009 (Nov 26).

Revman 5.0 Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer software]. Version 4.3.2 for Windows. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.

Agurto Lescano H, Sarmiento Rojas K, Romero Castro M, Moncada Cárcamo C. Compara- ción entre captopril y nifedipina en el tratamiento de urgencias hipertensivas [Comparison between captopril and nifedipina in the treatment of hypertensive urgencies]. Bol Soc Peru Med Interna. 1997;10(2):60-5.

Damasceno A, Ferreira B, Patel S, Sevene E, Polónia J. Efficacy of captopril and nifedipine in black and white patients with hypertensive crisis. J Hum Hypertens. 1997;11(8):471-6.

Dondici Filho J, Gomes JC, Castro EG, Luz NS, Abzaid A. Redução aguda da pressão arterial: estudo comparativo entre nifedipina e clonidina [Acute reduction of blood pressure: com- parative study between nifedipine and clonidine]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1991;56(2):127-30.

Flores Gonzalez J, Martinez Fernandez L, Martinez Garcia R, Fiterre Lancis I, Perez Caballero M. Clonidina y Nifedipina Oral en el Tratamiento de la Urgencia Hipertensiva [Oral clonidine and nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies]. Rev Cuba Med. 1996;35(3):156-63.

Gemici K, Karakoc Y, Ersoy A, Baran I, Güllülü S, Cordan J. A Comparison of Safety and Effi- cacy of Sublingual Captopril with Sublingual Nifedipine in Hypertensive Crisis. Int J Angiol. 1999;8(3):147-9.

Gemici K, Baran I, Bakar M, Demircan C, Ozdemir B, Cordan J. Evaluation of the effect of the sublingually administered nifedipine and captopril via transcranial doppler ultrasonography during hypertensive crisis. Blood Press. 2003;12(1):46-8.

Habib GB, Dunbar LM, Rodrigues R, Neale AC, Friday KJ. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of oral nicardipine in treatment of urgent hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double- blind, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Am Heart J. 1995;129(5):917-23.

Komsuoğlu B, Sengün B, Bayram A, Komsuoğlu SS. Treatment of hypertensive urgencies with oral nifedipine, nicardipine, and captopril. Angiology. 1991;42(6):447-54.

Mansur Ade P, Ramires JA, Avakian SD, de Paula RS, Pileggi F. Efeito comparativo do diaze- pam, nifedipina, propranolol e da associação nifedipina e propranolol, por via sublingual, em pacientes com crise hipertensiva [Comparison of the effects of diazepam, nifedipine, propranolol and a combination of nifedipine and propranolol, by sublingual administration, in patients with hypertensive crisis]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1991;57(4):313-7.

McDonald AJ, Yealy DM, Jacobson S. Oral labetalol versus oral nifedipine in hypertensive urgencies in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 1993;11(5):460-3.

Moritz RD, Queiroz LP, Pereira MR, Scotinni MA. Estudo comparativo do uso da nifedipina e do captopril em urgências hipertensivas [Comparative study of the use of nifedipine and captopril in hypertensive emergencies]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1989;52(6):323-6.

Olmedo Canchola VH, Rosas Heredia ML, Campos de la Vega G. Comparación de la eficacia entre captopril sublingual contra placebo en urgencias hipertensivas [Comparison of the efficiency between sublingual captopril vs placebo in hypertensive urgencies]. Med Interna Méx. 2000;16(6):303-7.

Opie LH, Jennings A. Sublingual captopril versus nifedipine in hypertensive crises. Lancet. 1985;2(8454):555.

Pascale C, Zampaglione B, Marchisio M. Management of hypertensive crisis: nifedipine in comparison with captopril, clonidine, and furosemide. Current Therapeutic Research. 1992;51(1):9-18. Available from: http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=5202552. Accessed in 2009 (Nov 26).

Pérez CC, Dougnac LA, Alvarez ZM, et al. Captopril sublingual versus nifedipina para el tratamiento de la crisis hipertensiva [Sublingual captopril versus nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive crisis]. Rev Méd Chile. 1991;119(4):402-5.

Pujadas R, Jané J, Fornós C, Gago MJ, de la Concepción N. Comparison of sublingual cap- topril and nifedipine in hypertensive crises. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(1):175-6.

Pujadas R, Jané J, Gago MJ, Fornos C, Escrivá E, Roca N. Captopril versus Nifedipina sublingual en el tratamiento de las crisis hipertensivas. Anales de Medicina Interna. 1987;4(10):524-5.

Biollaz J, Waeber B, Brunner HR. Hypertensive crisis treated with orally administered capto- pril. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;25(2):145-9.

Cristodorescu R, Bartha P, Dragan S, Nicolin M. Tratamentul crizei hipertensive cu nifedipina în teren [The treatment of hypertensive crisis with nifedipine as the basis]. Rev Med Interna Neurol Psichiatr Neurochir Dermatovenerol Med Interna. 1989;41(6):529-38.

Dadkar VN, Karnik ND, Izar M, et al. Sublingual nifedipine and captopril in hypertensive urgencies and emergencies. Indian Heart J. 1993;45(3):185-7.

Facci Júnior C, Gonçalves LC, Dias SE, Gantois CR, Facci AM, Barbosa ET.. Captopril na crise hipertensiva [Captopril in hypertensive crises]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1984;42(1):73-6.

Hirschl MM, Seidler D, Müllner M, et al. Efficacy of different antihypertensive drugs in the emergency department. J Hum Hypertens. 1996;10(Suppl 3):S143-6.

Karachalios GN, Chrisikos N, Kintziou H, Petrogiannopoulos K, Kehagioglou K. Treatment of hyper- tensive crisis with sublingual captopril. Current Therapeutic Research. 1990;48(1):5-9. Available from: http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=19273721. Accessed in 2009 (Nov 26).

Koehler NR, Rabin M, Chatkin JM, et al. Nifedipina comprimido via sub-lingual na cri- se hipertensiva [Sublingual tablet of nifedipine in hypertensive crisis]. Rev AMRIGS. 1985;29(2):113-5.

Peret Martínez JJ, Roca-Cusachs i Coll A, Monmany i Roca J, Nolla i Panadès J. [Use of sublingual nifedipine in the hypertensive crisis]. Med Clin (Barc). 1983;81(13):558-60.

Santos RJ, Cavalcanti R, Oliveira CC, et al. Ensaio terapêutico nifedipina sub lingual na crise hiper- tensiva [Therapeutic assay sublingual nifedipine in hypertensive crisis]. ECMAL. 1986;4(1):20-2.

Sobrino J, Coca A, de la Sierra A, Closas J, Aguilera MT, Urbano-Márquez A. Prevalencia, formas clínicas de presentación y tratamiento de la hipertensión arterial en una unidad de urgencias [Prevalence, forms of clinical presentation and treatment of arterial hypertension at an emergency unit]. Rev Clin Esp. 1990;187(2):56-60.

Späh F, Grosser KD. Treatment of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies with nitrendipine, nifedipine, and clonidine: effect on blood pressure and heart rate. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;12(Suppl 4):S154-6.

Tereshchenko SN, Dzhaiani NA, Morozova MN. [Comparative efficacy of carvedilol and capo- ten in the treatment of an uncomplicated hypertensive crisis]. Ter Arkh. 2006;78(8):26-30.

Alletto M, Burgio A, Fulco G, Paradiso R, Piangiamore M, Vancheri F. Captopril sublingua- le nelle crisi ipertensive [Sublingual captopril in hypertensive crises]. Recenti Prog Med. 1992;83(9):503-5.

Castro del Castillo A, Rodriguez M, Gonzalez E, Rodriguez F, Estruch J. Dose-response effect of sublingual captopril in hypertensive crises. J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;28(7):667-70.

Domínguez B, Díaz R. Tratamiento de las urgencias y de las crises hipertensivas con nifedipi- na sublingual [Treatment of hypertensive emergencies and crisis with sublingual nifedipine]. Rev Med Panama. 1988;13(2):100-6.

Gómez Santos FA, Hidalgo Nuñez LW, Mendoza de Jesús A, Sanz MA, Noyer J. Nifedipina sublingual en el manejo de la crisis hipertensiva [Sublingual nifedipine in hypertensive emergency]. Rev Méd Domin. 1992;53(1):25-7.

Gökel Y, Paydas S, Kuvandik G, Alparslan N. Sublingual valsartan in hypertensive urgency. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2001;31(6):565-7. Available from: http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/medical/issues/sag-01-31-6/sag-31-6-17-0101-13.pdf. Accessed in 2009 (Nov 26).

Guazzi M, Olivari MT, Polese A, Fiorentini C, Magrini F, Moruzzi P. Nifedipine, a new antihyper- tensive with rapid action. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1977;22(5 Pt 1):528-32.

Heller MB, Duda J, Maha RJ, et al. Prehospital use of nifedipine for severe hypertension. Am J Emerg Med. 1990;8(4):282-4.

Hirschl MM, Seidler D, Zeiner A, et al. Intravenous urapidil versus sublingual nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive urgencies. Am J Emerg Med. 1993;11(6):653-6.

Karnik ND, Bhatt AD, Trivedi TH, et al. Nifedipine, captopril, metoprolol and nifedipine with metoprolol in hypertensive crisis in non-intensive care setting. J Assoc Physicians India. 1996;44(7):480-2.

Maciel R, Spritzer N, Spritzer TS, Abichequer MH. Captopril na crise hipertensiva [Captopril in the hypertensive crisis]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1983;40(6):429-31.

Martínez-Amenós A, Carratalà J, Pintó X, Santaló M, Tamayo C, Pujol M. [Hypertensive crisis: comparative study of oral captopril, sublingual captopril and sublingual nifedipine]. Med Clin (Barc). 1987;89(2):59-61.

Pose Reino A, González-Juanatey JR, Fernández Velo JL, Amaro Cendón A, Bugallo Paz L, Gil de la Peña M. Enalapril sublingual en crisis hipertensiva. Estudio preliminar [Sublingual enalapril in hypertensive crisis. A preliminary study]. An Med Interna. 1989;6(8):421-3.

Preston RA, Baltodano NM, Cienki J, Materson BJ. Clinical presentation and management of patients with uncontrolled, severe hypertension: results from a public teaching hospital. J Hum Hypertens. 1999;13(4):249-55.

Rubio Guerra AF, Vargas Ayala G, Rodrígues López L, Lozano Nuevo JJ, Trejo Orozco N. Com- paración entre nifedipina sublingual y dosis sucesivas de dinitrato de isosorbide en aerosol para las crises hipertensivas [Sub-lingual nifedipine vs. isosorbide spray in hypertensive crisis]. Rev Fac Med UNAM. 1999;42(4):148-50.

Saragoça MA, Ribeiro AB, Ramos OL. Crise hipertensiva. Tratamento com captopril após insucesso com diurético. Estudo multicêntrico [Hypertensive crisis. Treatment with captopril after failure with diuretic. Multicentric study]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1982;38(5):415-9.

Sulbarán T, Aparicio J, Bermúdez G. Uso del captopril sublingual en crisis hipertensivas [The use of sublingual captopril in hypertensive crises]. Invest Clin. 1994;35(3):143-54.

Toledo Hviid GE, Justiniano Encina J. Captopril sublingual en las crisis Hipertensivas [Sublin- gual captopril in hypertensive crisis]. Rev Méd Cruceña. 1995;(15):40-3.

Wyss F, Ovando A, Loria R. Captopril sublingual en urgencia hipertensiva [Sublingual capto- pril in hypertensive emergencies]. Rev Med Interna. 1999;10(2):16-8.

Franklin C, Nightingale S, Mamdani B. A randomized comparison of nifedipine and sodium nitroprusside in severe hypertension. Chest. 1986;90(4):500-3.

Isles CG, Johnson AO, Milne FJ. Slow release nifedipine and atenolol as initial treatment in blacks with malignant hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;21(4):377-83.

Just VL, Schrader BJ, Paloucek FP, Hoon TJ, Leikin JB, Bauman JL. Evaluation of drug therapy for treatment of hypertensive urgencies in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 1991;9(2):107-11.

Lima SG, Nascimento LS, Santos Filho CN, Albuquerque MFPM, Victor EG. Hipertensão ar- terial sistêmica no setor de emergência: o uso de medicamentos sintomáticos como alter- nativa de tratamento [Systemic hypertension at emergency units: the use of symptomatic drugs as choice for management]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2005;85(2):115-23.

Misra A, Jain P, Reddy RB. Sublingual captopril in hypertensive urgencies. Postgrad Med J. 1993;69(812):498-9.

Sol JB, Gonzáles RR, Planas JT, Riera AC. El tratamiento hipotensor sublingual. ¿Compara grupos homogêneos de hipertensos? Revista Clinica Española. 1987;181(7):403-4.

Bussmann WD, Kenedi P, von Mengden HJ, Nast HP, Rachor N. Comparison of nitroglycerin with nifedipine in patients with hypertensive crisis or severe hypertension. Clin Investig. 1992;70(12):1085-8.

Diker E, Ertürk S, Akgün G. Is sublingual nifedipine administration superior to oral adminis- tration in the active treatment of hypertension? Angiology. 1992;43(6):477-81.

Gökel Y, Satar S, Paydas S. A comparison of the effectiveness of sublingual losartan, sublin- gual captopril and sublingual nifedipine in hypertensive urgency. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 1999;29(6):655-60. Available from: http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/medical/issues/sag-99-29-6/sag-29-6-11-98183.pdf. Accessed in 2009 (Nov 26).

Bussmann WD, Kenedi P, von Mengden HJ, Nast HP, Rachor M. Nitroglycerin im Vergleich zu Nifedipin bei Patienten mit hypertensiver Krise [Nitroglycerin in comparison with nifedipine in patients with hypertensive crisis]. Z Kardiol. 1993;82(1):33-7.

Vázquez Vigoa A, Gundián González-Piñera J, Cordiés Jackson L, Pérez Caballero MD. Captopril versus nifedipina sublingual en el tratamiento de la urgencia hipertensiva [Captopril versus nifedi- pine given sublingually in treating hypertensive emergency]. Rev Cuba Med. 1993;32(1):19-27.

Sechi LA, Tedde R, Cassisa L, et al. Sublingual and intravenous ketanserin versus sublingual nifedi- pine in the treatment of severe hypertension: a randomized study. Clin Ther. 1989;11(6):834-40.

Woisetschläger C, Bur A, Vlcek M, Derhaschnig U, Laggner AN, Hirschl MM. Comparison of intravenous urapidil and oral captopril in patients with hypertensive urgencies. J Hum Hypertens. 2006;20(9):707-9.

Al-Waili NS, Hasan NA. Efficacy of sublingual verapamil in patients with severe essential hypertension: comparison with sublingual nifedipine. Eur J Med Res. 1999;4(5):193-8.

Damasceno A, Sevene E, Patel S, Polónia J. Nifedipine-retard versus nifedipine-capsules for the therapy of hypertensive crisis in black patients. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998;31(1):165-9.

Dessì-Fulgheri P, Bandiera F, Rubattu S, et al. Comparison of sublingual and oral captopril in hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens A. 1987;9(2-3):593-7.

Guazzi MD, De Cesare N, Galli C, Salvioni A, Tamborini G, Tosi E. La nifédipine en tant qu’antihypertenseur vasodilatateur d’effet rapide [Nifedipine as a vasodilator antihyperten- sive with a rapid action]. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1985;78 Spec No:59-65.

Maharaj B, van der Byl K. A comparison of the acute hypotensive effects of two different doses of nifedipine. Am Heart J. 1992;124(3):720-5.

Phillips RA. Hypertensive urgencies. Emergency Medicine 1990;15:91-100.

Sánchez M, Sobrino J, Ribera L, Adrián MJ, Torres M, Coca A. Long-acting lacidipine versus short-acting nifedipine in the treatment of asymptomatic acute blood pressure increase. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999;33(3):479-84.

Saragoça MA, Portela JE, Plavnik F, Ventura RP, Lotaif L, Ramos OL. Isradipine in the treatment of hypertensive crisis in ambulatory patients. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;19 Suppl 3: S76-8.

Savi L, Montebelli MR, D’Alonzo S, Mettimano M, Folli G. Sublingual nicardipine versus nife- dipine to treat hypertensive urgencies. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1992;30(2):41-5.

Schneider E, Jennings AA, Opie LH. Captopril, nifedipine and their combination for the- rapy of hypertensive urgencies. Survey of Anestesiology. 1992;36(4):247. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/surveyanesthesiology/Citation/1992/06000/Captopril,_Nifedi-pine_and_Their_Combination_for.42.aspx. Accessed in 2009 (Nov 26).

Veloz M. Captopril oral versus sublingual en crisis hipertensivas [Oral Captopril versus su- blingual in hypertensive crises]. Quito; s.n; s.f. 16 p. graf, tab.

Zampaglione B, Pascale C, Marchisio M, Santoro A. The use of lacidipine in the management of hypertensive crises: a comparative study with nifedipine. J Cardiovascular Pharmacol. 1994;23 Suppl 5:S116-8.

Downloads

Published

2009-11-11

How to Cite

1.
Souza LM, Riera R, Saconato H, Demathé A, Atallah Álvaro N. Oral drugs for hypertensive urgencies: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2009 Nov. 11 [cited 2025 Mar. 9];127(6):366-72. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1920

Issue

Section

Systematic Review