Divergences in antihypertensive therapy in special situations in nephrology

Authors

  • Marcelo Montebello Lemos Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Alessandra Coelho Pedrosa Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Alze Pereira Tavares Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Miguel Ângelo Góes Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Sérgio Antônio Draibe Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Ricardo Sesso Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Keywords:

Hypertension, Antihypertensive agents, Kidney diseases, Guidelines, Evidencebased medicine

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The choice of an antihypertensive drug is based on several criteria and specific situations give rise to doubt and controversy. The aim here was to evaluate physicians’ approaches towards treatment with antihypertensive agents in specific situations. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study, at Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo. METHODS: A questionnaire was applied during a nephrology meeting to evaluate individual approaches towards each hypothetical clinical situation. The questionnaire consisted of five multiple-choice questions (clinical cases) concerning controversial aspects of antihypertensive therapy. RESULTS: A total of 165 questionnaires were analyzed. Most participants were nephrologists (93.2%). There was a preference for angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in at least two of the cases. Only 57.2% of the physicians were correct in choosing beta-blockers as the first-line drugs for patients with ischemic coronary disease. Moreover, 66.2% chose ACE inhibitors as the first-line drugs for patients with chronic kidney disease and proteinuria. About 5% of the physicians did not follow the current recommendations for the use of ACE inhibitors in diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. The most controversial question concerned the firstline drug for advanced chronic kidney disease. Most physicians were correct in choosing calcium channel blockers and avoiding ACE inhibitors in renovascular hypertension in the case of a patient with a single functioning kidney. CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians adopted the correct approach, but some had an alternative strategy for the same situations that was not based on evidence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marcelo Montebello Lemos, Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Postgraduate student, Discipline of Nephrology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

Alessandra Coelho Pedrosa, Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Postgraduate student, Discipline of Nephrology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

Alze Pereira Tavares, Universidade Federal de São Paulo

MD. Nephrologist, Uremia Outpatient Clinic, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

Miguel Ângelo Góes, Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Postgraduate student, Discipline of Nephrology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

Sérgio Antônio Draibe, Universidade Federal de São Paulo

MD, PhD. Associate professor, Discipline of Nephrology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

Ricardo Sesso, Universidade Federal de São Paulo

MD, PhD. Associate professor, Discipline of Nephrology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

References

Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560-72.

Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI). K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines on hypertension and antihypertensive agents in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43(5 Suppl 1):S1-290.

Sociedade Brasileira de Hipertensão; Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia; Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia. IV Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial. [IV Brazilian Guidelines on Hypertension]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2004;82 (Suppl 4):7-22.

Gibbons RJ, Chatterjee K, Daley J, et al. ACC/AHA/ACP- ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(7):2092-197.

Timolol-induced reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1981;304(14):801-7.

Hjalmarson A, Herlitz J, Holmberg S, et al. The Göteborg metoprolol trial. Effects on mortality and morbidity in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1983;67(6 Pt 2):I26-32.

Waagstein F, Bristow MR, Swedberg K, et al. Beneficial effects of metoprolol in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy (MDC) Trial Study Group. Lancet. 1993;342(8885):1441-6.

Hjalmarson A, Goldstein S, Fagerberg B, et al. Effects of controlled- release metoprolol on total mortality, hospitalizations, and well-be- ing in patients with heart failure: the Metoprolol CR/XL Random- ized Intervention Trial in congestive heart failure (MERIT-HF). MERIT-HF Study Group. JAMA. 2000;283(10):1295-302.

Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, et al. The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. U.S. Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(21):1349-55.

Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart AssociationTask Forceon Practice Guidelines (Writing Commit- tee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2005;112(12):e154-235.

van den Heuvel AF, Dunselman PH, Kingma T, et al. Reduc- tion of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia during add-on treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in patients with normal left ventricular function and optimal beta blockade. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(2):470-4.

Pepine CJ, Rouleau JL, Annis K, et al. Effects of angiotensin-con- verting enzyme inhibition on transient ischemia: the Quinapril Anti-Ischemia and Symptoms of Angina Reduction (QUASAR) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(12):2049-59.

Krikler DM. Calcium antagonists for chronic stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59(3):95B-100B.

Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation. 2004;110(5):588-636.

Remuzzi G, Bertani T. Is glomerulosclerosis a consequence of altered glomerular permeability to macromolecules? Kidney Int. 1990;38(3):384-94.

Williams PS, Fass G, Bone JM. Renal pathology and proteinuria determine progression in untreated mild/moderate chronic renal failure. Q J Med. 1988;67(252):343-54.

Peterson JC, Adler S, Burkart JM, et al. Blood pressure con- trol, proteinuria, and the progression of renal disease. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123(10):754-62.

Apperloo AJ, de Zeeuw D, de Jong PE. Short-term antiprotein- uric response to antihypertensive treatment predicts long-term GFR decline in patients with non-diabetic renal disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 1994;45:S174-8.

Randomised placebo-controlled trial of effect of ramipril on decline in glomerular filtration rate and risk of terminal renal failure in proteinuric, non-diabetic nephropathy. The GISEN Group (Gruppo Italiano di Studi Epidemiologici in Nefrologia). Lancet. 1997;349(9069):1857-63.

Maschio G, Alberti D, Janin G, et al. Effect of the angioten- sin-converting-enzyme inhibitor benazepril on the progres- sion of chronic renal insufficiency. The Angiotensin-Convert- ing-Enzyme Inhibition in Progressive Renal Insufficiency Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(15):939-45.

Nakao N, Yoshimura A, Morita H, Takada M, Kayano T, Ideura T. Combination treatment of angiotensin-II receptor blocker and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor in non-diabetic renal disease (COOPERATE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9352):117-24.

Gross JL, de Azevedo MJ, Silveiro SP, Canani LH, Caramori ML, Zelmanovitz T. Diabetic nephropathy: diagnosis, preven- tion, and treatment. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(1):164-76.

Eknoyan G, Hostetter T, Bakris GL, et al. Proteinuria and other markers of chronic kidney disease: a position statement of the national kidney foundation (NKF) and the national institute of diabetes and digestive and kidney diseases (NIDDK). Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(4):617-22.

Hovind P, Tarnow L, Rossing P, et al. Predictors for the development of microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria in patients with type 1 diabetes: inception cohort study. BMJ. 2004;328(7448):1105.

Captopril reduces the risk of nephropathy in IDDM patients with microalbuminuria. The Microalbuminuria Captopril Study Group. Diabetologia. 1996;39(5):587-93.

Viberti G, Mogensen CE, Groop LC, Pauls JF. Effect of cap- topril on progression to clinical proteinuria in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria. European Microalbuminuria Captopril Study Group. JAMA. 1994;271(4):275-9.

Randomised placebo-controlled trial of lisinopril in normo- tensive patients with insulin-dependent diabetes and normoal- buminuria or microalbuminuria. The EUCLID Study Group. Lancet. 1997;349(9068):1787-92.

Jerums G, Allen TJ, Campbell DJ, et al. Long-term comparison between perindopril and nifedipine in normotensive patients with type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;37(5):890-9.

Perkins BA, Ficociello LH, Silva KH, Finkelstein DM, Warram JH, Krolewski AS. Regression of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(23):2285-93.

Jacobsen P, Andersen S, Rossing K, Jensen BR, Parving HH. Dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system versus maximal recommended dose of ACE inhibition in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2003;63(5):1874-80.

Jacobsen P, Andersen S, Jensen BR, Parving HH. Additive effect of ACE inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockade in type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(4):992-9.

Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(12):861-9.

Remuzzi G, Ruggenenti P, Perna A, et al. Continuum of renoprotection with losartan at all stages of type 2 diabetic nephropathy: a post hoc analysis of the RENAAL trial results. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(12):3117-25.

ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2002;288(23):2981-97.

Palmer BF. Renal dysfunction complicating the treatment of hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1256-61.

Hou FF, Zhang X, Zhang GH, et al. Efficacy and safety of benazepril for advanced chronic renal insufficiency. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(2):131-40.

Hebert LA. Optimizing ACE-inhibitor therapy for chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(2):189-91.

Garovic VD, Textor SC. Renovascular hypertension and isch- emic nephropathy. Circulation. 2005;112(9):1362-74.

Losito A, Gaburri M, Errico R, Parente B, Cao PG. Survival of patients with renovascular disease and ACE inhibition. Clin Nephrol. 1999;52(6):339-43.

Hricik DE, Browning PJ, Kopelman R, Goorno WE, Madias NE, Dzau VJ. Captopril-induced functional renal insufficiency in patients with bilateral renal-artery stenoses or renal-artery stenosis in a solitary kidney. N Engl J Med. 1983;308(7):373-6.

Véniant M, Heudes D, Clozel JP, Bruneval P, Ménard J. Cal- cium blockade versus ACE inhibition in clipped and unclipped kidneys of 2K-1C rats. Kidney Int. 1994;46(2):421-9.

Schoolwerth AC, Sica DA, Ballermann BJ, Wilcox CS; Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease and the Council for High Blood Pressure Research of the American Hearth Associa- tion. Renal considerations in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease and the Council for High Blood Pressure Research of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2001;104(16):1985-91.

Jackson B, Matthews PG, McGrath BP, Johnston CI. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in renovascular hypertension: frequency of reversible renal failure. Lancet. 1984;1(8370):225-6.

Alcazar JM, Rodicio JL; European Society of Hypertension. How to handle renovascular hypertension. J Hypertens. 2001;19(11):2109-11.

Downloads

Published

2008-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Lemos MM, Pedrosa AC, Alze Pereira Tavares, Góes M Ângelo, Draibe SA, Sesso R. Divergences in antihypertensive therapy in special situations in nephrology. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2008 Jan. 1 [cited 2026 Oct. 29];126(1):34-40. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1934

Issue

Section

Original Article