The technological invention of disease and the decline of autopsies

Authors

  • Carlos Eduardo Pompilio
  • Joaquim Edson Vieira

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carlos Eduardo Pompilio

MD, PhD. Clinical director of the Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Joaquim Edson Vieira

MD, PhD. Secretary of the “Prof. Eduardo Marcondes” Center for Development of Medical Education (CEDEM), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.

References

Chariot P, Witt K, Pautot V, et al. Declining autopsy rate in a French hospital: physician’s attitudes to the autopsy and use of autopsy material in research publications. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124(5):739-45.

Lindström P, Janzon L, Sternby NH. Declining autopsy rate in Sweden: a study of causes and consequences in Malmö, Sweden. J Intern Med. 1997;242(2):157-65.

Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, Bettmann M, Weisberg M. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med. 1983;308(17):1000-5.

Autopsy Committee of the College of American Pathologists. The autopsy, medicine, and mortality statistics. Vital Health Stat 3. 2001;3(32):1-42.

González Bombardieri S. Reflexiones sobre la práctica actual de la anatomía patológica en Chile. [Reflections on the cur- rent state of anatomic pathology in Chile]. Rev Méd Chile. 2000;128(5):533-8.

Martínez Hernández A. La crisis de la autopsia. [The autopsy in crisis]. Rev Méd Chile. 2000;128(5):457-9.

Segura MEA, Rocha EM, Lourenço AA, Veloso MGP, Moraes WC. Comparação entre os diagnósticos clínicos e os achados de necropsia: análise retrospectiva de 680 pacientes. [Correlation between clinical and autopsy diagnoses: a retrospective analysis of 680 patients]. J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2006;42(6):461-7.

Rozman MA, Eluf-Neto J. Necropsia e mortalidade por causa mal definida no Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. [Autopsy and ill-defined cause of death in the state of São Paulo, Brazil]. Rev Panam Salud Pública = Pan Am J Public Health. 2006;20(5):307-13.

Burton JL, Underwood J. Clinical, educational, and epidemio- logical value of autopsy. Lancet. 2007;369(9571):1471-80.

Serviço de Verificação de Óbitos da Capital — USP. Estatística em número de autópsias realizadas. Available from: http://www. svoc.usp.br/estatistica.htm. Accessed in 2008 (Mar 4).

Byass P. Who needs cause-of-death data? PLoS Med. 2007;4(11):e333.

Foucault M. Open up a few corpses. In: Foucault M, editor. The birth of the clinic: an archaeology of medical perception. New York: Vintage Books; 1994. p. 124-48.

Hofmann B. The technological invention of disease. Med Humanit. 2001;27(1):10-9.

Habermas J. Técnica e ciência como “ideologia”. 1a ed. Lisboa: Edições 70; 2006.

Guttmann GD, Drake RL, Trelease RB. To what extent is cadaver dissection necessary to learn medical gross anatomy? A debate forum. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2004;281(1):2-3.

McLachlan JC, Patten D. Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future. Med Educ. 2006;40(3):243-53.

Pawlina W, Lachman N. Dissection in learning and teaching gross anatomy: rebuttal to McLachlan. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2004;281(1):9-11.

McLachlan JC. New path for teaching anatomy: living anatomy and medical imaging vs. dissection. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2004;281(1):4-5.

Hodgkin P. Medicine, postmodernism, and the end of certainty. BMJ. 1996;313(7072):1568-9.

Downloads

Published

2008-03-03

How to Cite

1.
Pompilio CE, Vieira JE. The technological invention of disease and the decline of autopsies. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2008 Mar. 3 [cited 2025 Mar. 9];126(2):71-2. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1960

Issue

Section

Editorial