A randomized and prospective study on the value of antibiotic prophylaxis administration in transurethral resection of the prostate

Authors

  • Paulo Rodrigues Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Hospital Santa Helena and Hospital Santa Paula
  • Flávio Hering Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Hospital Santa Helena and Hospital Santa Paula
  • Alex Meller Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Hospital Santa Helena and Hospital Santa Paula
  • João Carlos Campagnari Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Hospital Santa Helena and Hospital Santa Paula
  • Márcio D’Império Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Hospital Santa Helena and Hospital Santa Paula

Keywords:

Prostatism, Antibiotics, Prostate, Infection

Abstract

CONTEXT: Antibiotic prophylaxis in transurethral resection of the prostate is a regular practice in urology. However, its prophylactic effect can be questioned when the antiseptic surgical technique is used. Nonetheless, urine culture-oriented antibiotic therapy is the gold standard for avoiding improper medication usage and bacterial resistance. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of antibiotic usage in patients with negative urine cultures, who were submitted to transurethral resection of the prostate. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective open labeled study. SETTING: Tertiary care referral hospital PARTICIPANTS: 124 consecutive patients, who were randomly divided into two groups to receive antibiotic prophylaxis or not. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Cultures from meatus, urine, irrigation and antiseptic fluid, and prostate tissue chips, were compared and analyzed for bacterial sensitivity to the antibiotic used, according to the surgeon’s personal criteria. McLennan’s test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference regarding clinical evolution was found between the groups that received or antibiotics or not. Statistical significance was found regarding the occurrence of positive urine cultures during the postoperative period for those not receiving antibiotics, but not in relation to fever, prostate chip culture or bacteremic episodes. Sixty-eight subjects (57.1%) presented positive prostatic tissue culture. There was no specific correlation between the recovered bacteria from the meatus, prostatic tissue chip and urine and the spectrum of the administered antibiotic. Six cases showed the same bacteria in the urine and prostatic tissue chip. Only fifteen cases (25%) in the antibiotic group showed the desired sensitivity directed to the collected bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients whose urine is sterile is debatable in patients who are candidates for transurethral resection of the prostate. Most of the time, the antibiotic agent used is not specific for any of the bacteria recovered from the various sources analyzed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Paulo Rodrigues, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Hospital Santa Helena and Hospital Santa Paula

PhD. Urologist at Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa and Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil.

Flávio Hering, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Hospital Santa Helena and Hospital Santa Paula

PhD. Urologist at Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa and Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil.

Alex Meller, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Hospital Santa Helena and Hospital Santa Paula

PhD. Urologist at Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa and Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil.

João Carlos Campagnari, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Hospital Santa Helena and Hospital Santa Paula

PhD. Urologist at Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa and Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil.

Márcio D’Império, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Hospital Santa Helena and Hospital Santa Paula

MD. Urologist at Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil.

References

Wullt B, Connell H, Rollano P, Mänsson W, Colleen S, Svanborg C. Urodynamic factors influence the duration of Escherichia coli bacteriuria in deliberately colonized cases. J Urol 1998;159(6):2057-62.

Simon HB, Jeremias MT, Greene LF, Geraci JE. Antibiotic prophylaxis in transurethral prostatic resection. A clinical study. J Urol 1955;74(1):123-8.

Merritt WA. Bacterial endocarditis as a complication of transure- thral prostatic resection. J Urol 1951;65(1):100-5.

Robinson MR, Arudpragasam ST, Sahgal SM, et al. Bacterae- mia resulting from prostatic surgery: the source of bacteria. Br J Urol 1982;54(5):542-6.

Sullivan NM, Sutter VL, Mims MM, Marsh VH, Finegold SM. Clinical aspects of bacteremia after manipulation of the genitourinary tract. J Infect Dis 1973;127(1):49-55.

Nielsen OS, Maigaard S, Fridmodt-Moller N, Madsen PO. Pro- phylactic antibiotics in transurethral prostatectomy. J Urol 1981;126(1):60-2.

Prescott S, Hadi MA, Elton RA, Ritchie AW, Foubister GC, Gould JC, Hargreave TB. Antibiotic compared with antiseptic prophylaxis for prostatic surgery. Br J Urol 1990;66(5):509-14.

Charton M, Vallancien G, Veillon B, Brisset JM. Antibiotic prophy- laxis of urinary tract infection after transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized study. J Urol 1987;138(1):87-9.

Kunin CM, McCormack RC. Prevention of catheter-induced urinary-tract infections by sterile closed drainage. N Engl J Med 1966;274(21):1155-61.

Stamey TA, Meares EM Jr, Winningham DG. Chronic bacte- rial prostatitis and the diffusion of drugs into prostatic fluid. J Urol 1970;103(2):187-94.

Morris MJ, Golovsky D, Guinness MD, Maher PO. The value of prophylactic antibiotics in transurethral prostatic resection: a controlled trial, with observations on the origin of postopera- tive infection. Br J Urol 1976;48(6):479-84.

Gibbons RP, Stark RA, Correa RJ Jr, Cummings KB, Mason JT. The prophylactic use - or misuse - of antibiotics in transurethral rostatectomy. J Urol 1978;119(3):381-3.

Ramsey EW, Sheth NK. Antibiotic prophylaxis in patients un- dergoing prostatectomy. Urology 1983;21(4):376-8.

Genster HG, Madsen PO. Urinary tract infection following transurethral prostatectomy: with special reference to the use of antimicrobials. J Urol 1970;104(1):163-8.

Cafferkey MT, Falkiner FR, Gillespie WA, Murphy DM. Anti- biotics for the prevention of septicaemia in urology. J Antimicrob Chemother 1982;9(6):471-7.

Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Dickman ML, Smith CB. Factors pre- disposing to bacteriuria during indwelling urethral catheteriza- tion. N Engl J Med 1974;291(5):215-9.

Holl WH, Rous SN. Is antibiotic prophylaxis worthwhile in patients with transurethral resection of prostate?. Urology 1982; 19 (1): 43-6

Feldstein MS, Benson NA. Early catheter removal and reduced length of hospital stay following transurethral prostatectomy: a retrospec- tive analysis of 100 consecutive patients. J Urol 1988;140(3):532-4.

Downloads

Published

2004-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Rodrigues P, Hering F, Meller A, Campagnari JC, D’Império M. A randomized and prospective study on the value of antibiotic prophylaxis administration in transurethral resection of the prostate. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2004 Jan. 1 [cited 2025 Oct. 16];122(1):4-7. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/2487

Issue

Section

Original Article