Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of health and self-management in diabetes questionnaire (HASMID-10) into Brazilian Portuguese
Keywords:
Quality of life, Diabetes complications, Self care, Surveys and questionnaires, Measurement properties, Psychometric properties, COSMIN toolsAbstract
BACKGROUND: Considering the ability of the health and self-management in diabetes questionnaire (HASMID-10) to verify the impact of self-management on diabetes, we highlight its relevance to scientific research and clinical applicability. However, to date, no study has been conducted to scientifically support its use in other languages.
OBJECTIVE: To translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the HASMID-10 into the Brazilian Portuguese.
DESIGN AND SETTING: A translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation study conducted at Ceuma University.
METHODS: Study was conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures and Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments. We included participants of both sexes diagnosed with diabetes, aged between 18 and 64 years, and without cognitive deficits or any other limitations that would prevent them from answering the questionnaire. We assessed participants using the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) scale and HASMID-10. We assessed reliability using a test-retest model with a 7-day interval between assessments. We used intraclass
correlation coefficient (ICC), 95% confidence interval (CI), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable difference (MDD), Spearman correlation coefficient, and floor and ceiling effects.
RESULTS: Sample comprised 116 participants, most of whom were women, overweight, non-practitioners of physical activity, and nonsmokers. We observed significant correlations (P = 0.006; rho = -0.256) between the HASMID-10 and PAID, adequate reliability (ICC = 0.780) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.796). No ceiling or floor effects were observed.
CONCLUSION: HASMID-10 has adequate measurement properties and may be used for Brazilians.
Downloads
References
Khan MAB, Hashim MJ, King JK, et al. Epidemiology of Type 2 Diabetes – Global Burden of Disease and Forecasted Trends. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020;10(1):107-11. PMID: 32175717; https://doi.org/10.2991/jegh.k.191028.001.
Kharroubi AT, Darwish HM. Diabetes mellitus: The epidemic of the century. World J Diabetes. 2015;6(6):850-67. PMID: 26131326; https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v6.i6.850.
Telo GH, Cureau FV, de Souza MS, et al. Prevalence of diabetes in Brazil over time: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2016;8(1):65. PMID: 27610204; https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-016-0181-1.
Pereda P, Boarati V, Guidetti B, Duran AC. Direct and indirect costs of diabetes in Brazil in 2016. Ann Glob Health. 2022;88(1):1-14. PMID: 35340368; https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3000.
Spanakis EG, Chiarugi F, Kouroubali A, et al. Diabetes management using modern information and communication technologies and new care models. Interact J Med Res. 2012;1(2):e8. PMID: 23612026; https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.2193.
Winocour PH. Effective diabetes care: a need for realistic targets. BMJ. 2002;324(7353):1577-80. PMID: 12089099; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7353.1577.
Adu MD, Malabu UH, Malau-Aduli AEO, Malau-Aduli BS. Enablers and barriers to effective diabetes self-management: A multi-national investigation. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0217771. PMID: 31166971; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217771.
Davies MJ, Heller S, Skinner TC, et al. Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;336(7642):491-5. PMID: 18276664; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39474.922025.be.
Schmitt A, Gahr A, Hermanns N, et al. The Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ): development and evaluation of an instrument to assess diabetes self-care activities associated with glycaemic control. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11(1):138. PMID: 23937988; https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-138.
Carlton J, Elliott J, Rowen D, et al. Developing a questionnaire to determine the impact of self-management in diabetes: giving people with diabetes a voice. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):146. PMID: 28720133; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0719-4.
Carlton J, Rowen D, Elliott J. Assessment of the psychometric properties and refinement of the Health and Self-Management in Diabetes Questionnaire (HASMID). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):59. PMID: 32138742; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01305-3.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91. PMID: 11124735; https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147-57. PMID: 29435801; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3.
Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, et al. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes development of the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(3):626-31. PMID: 15735199; https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.3.626.
Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651-7. PMID: 21732199; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1.
Enderlein G. Fleiss, J. L.: The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York – Chichester – Brislane – Toronto – Singapore 1986, 432 S., £38.35. Biometrical J. 1988;30(3):304. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.4710300308.
Tan MKH, Goodall R, Hughes W, et al. A Methodological Assessment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome Clinical Practice Guidelines. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;60(2):274-81. PMID: 32636064; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.04.028.
Azimi N, Ebadi A, Majd HA, Rajab A, Ozgoli G. Assessing sexual and reproductive health dimensions tools in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus with regard to Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments checklist. J Educ Health Promot. 2020;9:310. PMID: 33426114; https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_391_20.
Kristensen SL, Rørth R, Jhund PS, et al. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(10):776-85. PMID: 31422062; https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30249-9.
Mauri-Obradors E, Estrugo-Devesa A, Jané-Salas E, Viñas M, López-López J. Oral manifestations of Diabetes Mellitus. A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017;22(5):e586-e594. PMID: 28809366; https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21655.
Karagiannis T, Avgerinos I, Liakos A, et al. Management of type 2 diabetes with the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2022;65(8):1251-61. PMID: 35579691; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05715-4.
Roy T, Lloyd CE. Epidemiology of depression and diabetes: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2012;142(Suppl):S8-S21. PMID: 23062861; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0327(12)70004-6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 São Paulo Medical Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.