Portuguese Advance Directives-a twist against futility? A cross sectional study

Autores

Palavras-chave:

Advance Directives, Medical Futility, Palliative Care, Legislation as topic, Health Literacy, End-of-life, Last Will, Public Law, Portugal Legislation, Decision-making

Resumo

BACKGROUND: Advance Directive documents allow citizens to choose the treatments they want for end-of-life care without considering therapeutic futility.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze patients’ and caregivers’ answers to Advance Directives and understand their expectations regarding their decisions.
DESIGN AND SETTING: This study analyzed participants’ answers to a previously published trial, conceived to test the document’s efficacy as a communication tool.
METHODS: Sixty palliative patients and 60 caregivers (n = 120) registered their preferences in the Advance Directive document and expressed their expectations regarding whether to receive the chosen treatments.
RESULTS: In the patient and caregiver groups, 30% and 23.3% wanted to receive cardiorespiratory resuscitation; 23.3% and 25% wanted to receive artificial organ support; and 40% and 35% chose to receive artificial feeding and hydration, respectively. The participants ignored the concept of therapeutic futility and expected to receive invasive treatments. The concept of therapeutic futility should be addressed and discussed with both the patients and caregivers. Legal Advanced Directive documents should be made
clear to reduce misinterpretations and potential legal conflicts.
CONCLUSION: The authors suggest that all citizens should be clarified regarding the futility concept before filling out the Advance Directives and propose a grammatical change in the document, replacing the phrase “Health Care to Receive / Not to Receive” with the sentence “Health Care to Accept / Refuse” so that patients cannot demand treatments, but instead accept or refuse the proposed therapeutic plans.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05090072
URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05090072.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Catarina Sampaio Martins, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

MD, MSc. Physician, Serviço de Medicina Paliativa do Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal; PhD student, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Rui Nunes, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

PhD. Cathedratic Professor, Departamento de Medicina da Comunidade, Informação e Decisão em Saúde Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Referências

Johnson SB, Butow PN, Kerridge I, Tattersall MHN. Patient autonomy and advance care planning: a qualitative study of oncologist and palliative care physicians’ perspectives. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(2):565-574. PMID: 28849351; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3867-5.

Pérez MV, Macchi MJ, Agranatti AF. Advance directives in the context of end-of-life palliative care. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2013;7(4):40610. PMID: 24152977; https://doi.org/10.1097/spc.0000000000000007.

Portugal. Law 25/2012 – Republic Diary n. 136/2012, Série I from July 16th, 2012. Available from: https://data.dre.pt/eli/lei/25/2012/07/16/p/ dre/pt/html. Accessed in 2023 (March 17).

Portugal. Serviços Partilhados Ministério Saúde - SPMS. RENTEV Testamento Vital. Diretiva Antecipada de Vontade (DAV). Available from: http://spms.min-saude.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Rentev_ form_v0.5.pdf. Accessed in 2023 (Mach 17).

Nunes R. Diretivas Antecipadas de Vontade. Brasília, DF: Conselho Federal de Medicina; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto; 2016.

Portugal. RENTEV – Registo Nacional Testamento Vital. Available from: https:// www.spms.min-saude.pt/2016/06/rentev/. Accessed in 2023 (March 17).

Arriaga M, Francisco R, Nogueira P, et al. Health Literacy in Portugal: Results of the Health Literacy Population Survey Project 2019-2021. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7):4225. PMID: 35409905; https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074225.

Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine’s Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(5):887-91. PMID: 9187612; https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246199705000-00028.

DeLisser HM. Medical futility. In: Ravitsky V, Fiester A, Caplan AL, editors. The Penn Center Guide To Bioethics. New York: Springer Publishing Company LLC; 2009. p. 762-7.

Santonocito C, Ristagno G, Gullo A, Weil MH. Do-not-resuscitate order: a view throughout the world. J Crit Care. 2013;28(1):14-21. PMID: 22981534; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.07.005.

Angelucci PA. What is medical futility? Nurs Crit Care. 2007;2(1):20-1. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/nursingcriticalcare/Fulltext/2007/01000/ What_is_medical_futility_.4.aspx. Accessed in 2023 (March 17).

Morata L. An evolutionary concept analysis of futility in health care. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(6):1289-1300. PMID: 29350780; https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13526.

Cardonna-Morrel M, Kim JCH, Turner RM, et al. Non-beneficial treatments in hospital at the end of life: a systematic review on extent of the problem. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(4):456-69. PMID: 27353273; https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw060.

Kobewka D, Lalani Y, Shaffer V, et al. “To Be or Not to Be”- cardiopulmonary resuscitation for hospitalized people who have a low probability of benefit: qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews. MDM Policy Pract. 2023;8(1):23814683231168589. PMID: 37122969; https://doi. org/10.1177/23814683231168589.

Rinehart A. Beyond the futility argument: the fair process approach and time-limited trials for managing dialysis conflict. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(11):2000-6. PMID: 23868900; https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.12191212.

Šarić L, Prkić I, Jukić M. Futile treatment – a review. J Bioeth Inq. 2017;14(3):329-37. PMID: 28634768; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9793-x.

Burlá C, Rego G, Nunes R. Alzheimer, dementia, and the living will: a proposal. Med Health Care Philos. 2014;17(3):389-95. PMID: 24737537; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9559-8.

Beauchamp TL. The idea of a “standard view” of informed consent. Am J Bioeth. 2017;17(12):1-2. PMID: 29148935; https://doi.org/10.1080/15 265161.2017.1400334.

Ordem dos Médicos. Carta Direitos e Deveres Utentes. Portugal. Available at: https://ordemdosmedicos.pt/carta-dos-direitos-e-deveres-dosutentes/. Accessed in 2023 (March 17).

Rodado EP, Sanchez DP, Grifo MG. Advance Directives. Comparison of current legislation within the European Union. Spanish J Legal Med. 2021.47(2):66-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.remle.2020.05.011.

LawDepot. Free Personal Directive. Canada. Available from: https://www. lawdepot.ca/ca/estate/living-will-personal-directive/#.YxM5GS_5RQI. Accessed in: 2023 (March 17).

LawDepot. Free Advance Decision. United Kingdom. Available from: https://www.lawdepot.co.uk/contracts/living-will-advance-directive /?loc=GB&pid=googleppc-71034191723-535272338357_sl-ggkey_ advance%20directive%20template&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIlqv2urb4QIVCZBoCR049gVZEAAYASAAEgJuBPD_BwE#.YxM12S_5RQI. Accessed in 2023 (March 17).

LawDepot. Free Health Care Directive. United States. Available from: https://www.lawdepot.com/us/estate/living-will-medical-power-ofattorney/#.YxM4IC_5RQI. Accessed in 2023 (March 17).

Spain. Consejería de Sanidad. Documento de Instrucciones Previas. Madrid: Dirección General de Humanización y Atención al Paciente. Available at: https://www.comunidad.madrid/sites/default/files/doc/ sanidad/chas/anexo_i_doc_iipp.pdf. Accessed in 2023 (March 20).

Germany. Rechtsdokumente. Patientenverfugung. Available at: https:// www.rechtsdokumente.de/vertraege/Patientenverfuegung/?webuser_ data_id=147310718. Accessed in 2023 (March 20).

Lawdepot. Free Living Will. Australia. Available at: https:// www.lawdepot.com/contracts/living-will-medical-power-ofattorney/?loc=AU&webuser_data_id=147311259#.YxSWLi_5RQI. Accessed in (March 20).

Netherlands. Nederlandse Vereniging voor een Vrijwillig Levenseinde. Schriftelijke Wilsverklaring. Available at: https://www.nvve.nl/informatie/ schriftelijke-wilsverklaringen. Accessed in 2023 (March 20).

Finland. Advance Decision. Finish Institute for Health and Welfare. Available at: https://thl.fi/en/web/ageing/end-of-life-care/advancedecision. Accessed in 2023 (March 20).

Fédération des Médecins Suisses. Directives anticipées de la FMH. Switzerland: FMH; 2013. Available at: https://www.fmh.ch/files/pdf25/fmhdirectives-anticipees-version-detaillee.pdf. Accessed in 2023 (March 20).

France. Le site officiel de l’Administration Française. Directives anticipées: dernières volontés sur les soins en fin de vie. Available at: https://www.

service-public.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/F32010. Accessed in 2023 (March 20).

Karnik S, Kanekar A. Ethical issues surrounding end-of-life care: a narrative review. Healthcare (Basel). 2016;4(2):24. PMID: 27417612; https://doi. org/10.3390/healthcare4020024.

Harris I, Murray SA. Can palliative care reduce futile treatment? A systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2013;3(4):389-98. PMID: 24950518; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000343.

Lo JJ, Graves N, Chee JH, Hildon ZJ. A systematic review defining non-beneficial and inappropriate end-of-life treatment in patients with non-cancer diagnoses: theoretical development for multistakeholder intervention design in acute care settings. BMC Palliat Care. 2022;21(1):195. PMID: 36352403; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904022-01071-7.

Downloads

Publicado

2025-03-27

Como Citar

1.
Martins CS, Nunes R. Portuguese Advance Directives-a twist against futility? A cross sectional study. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 27º de março de 2025 [citado 15º de outubro de 2025];142(3):1-7. Disponível em: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/3030

Edição

Seção

Artigo Original