Standard versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Keywords:
Urology, Pediatrics, Urolithiasis, Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous, Pediatric Endourology, Miniaturized Surgery, Percutaneous Renal Access, Perioperative Complications, Clavien-Dindo Classification, Renal Stone SurgeryAbstract
BACKGROUND: Although miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) is a less invasive alternative to standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), its comparative outcomes in pediatric patients remain unclear.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of mini-PCNL versus standard PCNL in children with nephrolithiasis.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review and meta-analysis conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective cohort studies of pediatric patients undergoing mini-PCNL or standard PCNL.
METHODS: Major databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Embase) were searched through August 2024. The primary endpoint was the stone-free rate. Secondary endpoints included operative time, postoperative fever, and complications classified by the Clavien–Dindo system.
RESULTS: Five studies (two RCTs and three retrospective cohort studies) involving 490 patients (46% underwent mini-PCNL) were included. Stone-free rates were comparable between the groups (relative risk [RR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.929–1.041; p = 0.56; I² = 0%). Mini-PCNL was associated with longer operative times (mean difference [MD], 7.5 min; 95% CI, 0.2–14.9; p = 0.04; I² = 78%) but a lower risk of Clavien–Dindo grade I complications (RR 0.464; 95% CI 0.442–0.944; p < 0.05; I² = 0%). No significant differences were observed in postoperative fever or Clavien–Dindo grade II–IV complications.
CONCLUSION: Mini-PCNL and standard PCNL achieve comparable stone-free rates in pediatric patients. Mini-PCNL is associated with fewer minor complications, whereas standard PCNL is associated with shorter operative times. Both techniques demonstrate similar safety profiles with respect to major complications.
CLINICAL TRIAL OR SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42024618399; available at: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024567890.
Downloads
References
1. European Association of Urology. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis – INTRODUCTION – Uroweb [Internet]. [cited 2026 Jul 16]. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis.
2. Nouralizadeh A, Sharifiaghdas F, Pakmanesh H, et al. Fluoroscopy-free ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients: a single-center experience. World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):667–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2184-z.
3. Özden E, Mercimek MN, Yakupoǧlu YK, Özkaya O, Sarikaya Ş. Modified Clavien classification in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: assessment of complications in children. J Urol. 2011 Jan;185(1):264–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.023.
4. Özden E, Şahin A, Tan B, Doğan HS, Eren MT, Tekgül S. Percutaneous renal surgery in children with complex stones. J Pediatr Urol. 2008 Aug;4(4):295–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.01.212.
5. Karatag T, Tepeler A, Silay MS, et al. A comparison of 2 percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones of sizes 10-20 mm: microperc vs miniperc. Urology. 2015 May;85(5):1015–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.010.
6. Ruhayel Y, Tepeler A, Dabestani S, et al. Tract sizes in miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a Systematic review from the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):220–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.046.
7. Mykoniatis I, Pietropaolo A, Pyrgidis N, et al. Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of renal stones over 2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Jul;74(4):409–17. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.22.04678-X.
8. Sharma G, Sharma A, Devana SK, Singh SK. Mini versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of renal stone disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Sep;8(5):1376–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.07.014.
9. Riva JJ, Malik KMP, Burnie SJ, Endicott AR, Busse JW. What is your research question? An introduction to the PICOT format for clinicians. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2012 Sep;56(3):167–71.
10. Clavien PA, Barkun J, Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
11. Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1785–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216669183.
12. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
13. Song G, Guo X, Niu G, Wang Y. Advantages of tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of preschool children under 3 years old. J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Apr;50(4):655–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.11.042.
14. Kumar N, Yadav P, Kaushik VN, et al. Mini-versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric population: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Dec;19(6):688–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.08.013.
15. Akdogan N, Deger M, Yilmaz IO, et al. Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy effective and safe in infants younger than 2 Years old? Comparison of mini standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Jun;20(3):402.e1-402.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.12.004.
16. Karkin K, Aydamirov M, Aksay B, et al. Comparison of two percutaneous nephrolithotomy methods for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones: Mini-PCNL and standard PCNL. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2024 May 6. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12369.
17. Mahmood SN, Aziz BO, Tawfeeq HM, Fakhralddin SS. Mini-versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of pediatric renal stones: is smaller enough? J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Dec;15(6):664.e1-664.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.009.
18. Qin P, Zhang D, Huang T, Fang L, Cheng Y. Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones > 2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Aug;48(4):637–48. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2021.0347.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fernanda Santos da Anunciação, João Lucas de Magalhães Leal Moreira, Caio Cezar Ferreira Fraga, Caio Vinicius Suartz, Ricardo Brianezi Tiraboschi, Roberto Iglesias Lopes, José Bessa Júnior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
