Comparison of different approaches to small saphenous vein reflux treatment
a retrospective study in two centers
Keywords:
Saphenous vein, Laser therapy, Cyanoacrylates, Radiofrequency ablationAbstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and treatment of small saphenous vein (SSV) insufficiency is of utmost importance for relieving chronic venous insufficiency symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of five different treatment approaches among patients with SSV insufficiency. DESIGN AND SETTING: Two-center retrospective clinical study, conducted at cardiovascular surgery clinics in a local training and research hospital and a state hospital. METHODS: A total of 282 extremities of 268 patients with SSV insufficiency alone who were treated for symptomatic varicose veins between January 2012 and January 2017 were included in the study. All extremities included in the study were divided into five groups as follows: high ligation + stripping; radiof-requency ablation (RFA); cyanoacrylate closure (CAC); and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) at the wave-lengths 980 nm and 1,470 nm. RESULTS: Although the recurrence rate at six months was similar among the treatment groups, we found significant differences in recurrence rates at one year, with lower rates in the CAC, RFA and 1,470 nm EVLA groups, compared with the other treatments (P = 0.005). No sural neuritis was observed in the CAC group. The pigmentation rate was higher in the two EVLA groups (980 nm and 1,470 nm). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results showed that although CAC, RFA and EVLA at 1,470 nm seemed to be effective methods for treating SSV insufficiency alone, CAC and RFA had better aesthetic results than EVLA at 1,470 nm. We consider that endovenous non-thermal techniques for treating SSV insufficiency may be preferable because of relatively low risk of nerve injury.
Downloads
References
Maurins U, Hoffmann BH, Lösch C, et al. Distribution and prevalence of reflux in the superficial and deep venous system in the general population--results from the Bonn Vein Study, Germany. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(3):680-7. PMID: 18586443; doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.029.
Seidel A, Bergamasco N, Miranda F, Previdelli I, Barili E. The importance of small saphenous vein reflux on chronic venous disease clinic. Int Angiol. 2015;34(1):30-5. PMID: 24927019.
Wittens C, Davies AH, Bækgaard N, et al. Editor’s Choice - Management of Chronic Venous Disease: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(6):678-737. PMID: 25920631; doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.02.007.
Uhl JF, Gillot C. Anatomy and embryology of the small saphenous vein: nerve relationships and implications for treatment. Phlebology. 2013;28(1):4-15. PMID: 23256200; doi: 10.1258/phleb.2012.012j08.
O’Donnell TF Jr, Iafrati MD. The small saphenous vein and other ‘neglected’ veins of the popliteal fossa: a review. Phlebology. 2007;22(4):148-55. PMID: 18265528; doi: 10.1258/026835507781477172.
van Rij AM, Jiang P, Solomon C, Christie RA, Hill GB. Recurrence after varicose vein surgery: a prospective long-term clinical study with duplex ultrasound scanning and air plethysmography. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(5):935-43. PMID: 14603197; doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00601-3.
Rashid HI, Ajeel A, Tyrrell MR. Persistent popliteal fossa reflux following saphenopopliteal disconnection. Br J Surg. 2002;89(6):748-51. PMID: 12027985; doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02125.x.
Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:S240-S252. PMID: 22588748; doi: 10.1002/acr.20543.
Woźniak W, Mlosek RK, Ciostek P. Complications and Failure of Endovenous Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation Procedures in Patients With Lower Extremity Varicose Veins in a 5-Year Follow-Up. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016;50(7):475-83. PMID: 27681171: doi: 10.1177/1538574416671247.
Hong KP. Midterm Clinical Outcomes after Modified High Ligation and Segmental Stripping of Incompetent Small Saphenous Veins. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;48(6):398-403. PMID: 26665106; doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.6.398.
Park JY, Galimzahn A, Park HS, Yoo YS, Lee T. Midterm results of radiofrequency ablation for incompetent small saphenous vein in terms of recanalization and sural neuritis. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(4):383-9. PMID: 24826395.
Spreafico G, Piccioli A, Bernardi E, et al. Endovenous laser ablation of great and small saphenous vein incompetence with a 1470-nm laser and radial fiber. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2014;2(4):403-10. PMID: 26993546; doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.04.012.
Vourliotakis G, Sahsamanis G, Evagelidis P, Aivatidi C. Endovascular laser treatment of incompetent saphenous veins using the 1470 nm diode laser and radial fiber. Ann Med Surg. 2017;25:12-6. PMID: 29326812; doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.12.002.
Boersma D, Kornmann VN, van Eekeren RR, et al. Treatment Modalities for Small Saphenous Vein Insufficiency: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23(1):199-211. PMID: 26564912; doi: 10.1177/1526602815616375.
Bissacco D, Stegher S, Calliari FM, Viani MP. Saphenous vein ablation with a new cyanoacrylate glue device: a systematic review on 1000 cases. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019;28(1):6-14. PMID: 29671660; doi: 10.1080/13645706.2018.1464029.
Aurshina A, Alsheekh A, Kibrik P, Hingorani A, Marks N, Ascher E. Recanalization After Endovenous Thermal Ablation. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;52:158-62. PMID: 29777845: doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.03.017.
Van der Velden SK, Lawaetz M, De Maeseneer MG, Hollestein L, Nijsten T, van den Bos RR; Members of the Predictors of Endovenous Thermal Ablation Group. Predictors of Recanalization of the Great Saphenous Vein in Randomized Controlled Trials 1 Year After Endovenous Thermal Ablation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;52(2):234-41. PMID: 26994834: doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.03.017.
Casana R, Tolva VS, Odero A Jr, Malloggi C, Parati G. Three-year follow-up and quality of life of endovenous radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein with the ClosureFast™ procedure: Influence of BMI and CEAP class. Vascular. 2018;26(5):498-508. PMID: 29486654: doi: 10.1177/1708538118762066.
Gibson KD, Ferris BL, Polissar N, Neradilek B, Pepper D. Endovenous laser treatment of the small [corrected] saphenous vein: efficacy and complications. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(4):795-801. PMID: 17306952; doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.11.059.
Park SJ, Yim SB, Cha DW, Kim SC, Lee SH. Endovenous laser treatment of the small saphenous vein with a 980-nm diode laser: early results. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(4):517-24. PMID: 18248488; doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.34097.x.
Aktas AR, Celik O, Ozkan U, et al. Comparing 1470- and 980-nm diode lasers for endovenous ablation treatments. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(5):1583-7. PMID: 25990260; doi: 10.1007/s10103-015-1768-8.
Darwood RJ, Gough MJ. Endovenous laser treatment for uncomplicated varicose veins. Phlebology. 2009;24 Suppl 1:50-61. PMID: 19307441: doi: 10.1258/phleb.2009.09s006.
Samuel N, Carradice D, Wallace T, Mekako A, Hatfield J, Chetter I. Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation versus conventional surgery for small saphenous varicose veins. Ann Surg. 2013;257(3):419-26. PMID: 23160149: doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318275f4e4.
Doganci S, Yildirim V, Demirkilic U. Does puncture site affect the rate of nerve injuries following endovenous laser ablation of the small saphenous veins? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(3):400-5. PMID: 21194988; doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.11.029.
Sanioglu S, Yerebakan H, Ozgen A, et al. Mid-calf level as a puncture site is not safe enough for thermal ablation of the small saphenous vein. SAGE Open Med. 2017;5:2050312117731474. PMID: 28932398; doi: 10.1177/2050312117731474.
