Reactions of physicians in the state of São Paulo to the use of telemedicine during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
cross-sectional study
Keywords:
Telemedicine, Delivery of health care, Professional practice, COVID-19Abstract
BACKGROUND: Telemedicine can be a component of integrated healthcare practices and its use is not a recent phenomenon around the world. In Brazil, its more widespread use began during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, through extraordinary authorization from the Brazilian Ministry of Health. OBJECTIVES: To describe some aspects of use of teleconsultation among a sample of physicians in the state of São Paulo during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study based on a survey conducted by the São Paulo Medical Association (Associação Paulista de Medicina, APM) on medical practice during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic between December 18, 2020, and January 18, 2021. RESULTS: This survey generated responses from 2,052 physicians. Of these, 981 (47.8%) reported not practicing any form of telemedicine. Among those who reported practicing telemedicine, 274 (28.4%) reported not receiving remuneration directly for the attendance provided and 225 (23.3%) reported receiving remuneration equal to what they would have received from face-to-face consultations. Regarding the professional linkage of the physicians who undertook telemedicine attendance, the majority (499; 51.8%) only attended private patients. Regarding the resources used to provide telemedicine attendance, most of the respondents used specialized digital platforms (594; 61.6%), electronic health records (592; 61.4%) and electronic prescriptions (700; 72.6%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that important issues such as professional remuneration, use of electronic platforms and medical records, ensuring data protection and relationships between physicians and other stakeholders still need to be better defined, in order to achieve the desired scale and reach the outcomes defined.
Downloads
References
Skochelak SE, Hawkins RE. Health Systems Science. 1st ed. St Louis, MI: Elsevier; 2016.
Wen CL. Telemedicina do Presente para o Ecossistema de Saúde Conectada 5.0. São Paulo: Instituto de Estudos em Saúde Suplementar; 2020.
Schimitz CAA, Gonçalves MR, Umpierre RN, et al. Consulta remota: fundamentos e prática. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2021.
Sabatini RME. A Telemedicina no Brasil, Evolução e Perspectivas. Informática em Saúde. São Bernardo do Campo: Editora Yendis; 2012.
Kaiser Permanente. Annual Report 2018. Available from: https://healthy.kaiserpermanente.org/static/health/annual_reports/kp_annualreport_2018/?kp_shortcut_referrer=kp.org/annualreport#/numbers Accessed in 2021 (Nov 8).
Global Med. The Rules Are Changing: The Truth About Telemedicine Revenue and Reimbursement. Available from: https://www.globalmed.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/GlobalMed_WhitePaper_v2_FINAL_Apr2020.pdf Accessed in 2021 (Nov 8).
De la Torre-Díez I, López-Coronado M, Vaca C, Aguado JS, de Castro C. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21(2):81-5. PMID: 25474190; https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2014.0053.
Malik AM, Viana FM. Telessaúde, eficiência e sustentabilidade. Harvard Business Review. 2015:54-8. Available from: http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/bitstream/handle/10438/14980/Telessa%C3%BAde%2C%20efici%C3%AAncia%20e%20sustentabilidade.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed in 2021 (Nov 8).
Harzheim E, Cheiri PS, Umpierre RN, et al. Telessaúde como eixo organizacional dos sistemas universais de saúde do século XXI. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade, 2019:14(41)1881-90. https://doi.org.org/10.5712/rbmfc14(41)1881.
World Medical Association. WMA Statement on the Ethics of Telemedicine - Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-statement-on-the-ethics-of-telemedicine/ Accessed in 2021 (Nov 8).
Conselho Federal de Medicina. Resolução 2227/2018. Available from: https://sistemas.cfm.org.br/normas/visualizar/resolucoes/BR/2018/2227 Accessed in 2021 (Nov 8).
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria No 467 de 20 de março de 2020. Available from: https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/portaria-n-467-de-20-de-marco-de-2020-24931299 Accessed in 2021 (Nov 8).
Brasil. Presidência da República. Lei 1398/2020. Available from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2020/lei/L13989.htm Accessed in 2021 (Nov 8).
Brasil. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados. Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Available from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/L13709.htm Accessed in 2021 (Nov 8).
Wahezi SE, Kohan LR, Spektor B, et al. Telemedicine and current clinical practice trends in the COVID-19 pandemic. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2021;35(3):307-19. PMID: 34511221; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.005.
Luo J, Tong L, Crotty BH, et al. Telemedicine Adoption during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Gaps and Inequalities. Appl Clin Inform. 2021;12(4):836-44. PMID: 34496419; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1733848.
Rangachari P, Mushiana SS, Herbert K. A Narrative Review of Factors Historically Influencing Telehealth Use across Six Medical Specialties in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9):4995. PMID: 34066829; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094995.
Brunet F, Malas K, Desrosiers ME. Will telemedicine survive after COVID-19? Healthc Manage Forum. 2021;34(5):256-9. PMID: 34340570; https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704211031264.
