Varíola dos macacos
mapeamento nas principais ferramentas com sistemas metabuscadores e filtrados por evidências
Keywords:
Varíola dos macacos, revisão sistemática, prática clínica baseada em evidências, comportamento de busca de informação, ferramenta de busca, interoperabilidade da informação em saúdeAbstract
Contexto: O aumento de casos de varíola dos macacos fora do continente africano tem causado preocupação às autoridades sanitárias pela maior agressividade, sugerindo a necessidade de maiores cuidados, envolvendo maior risco de evolução desfavorável. Objetivos: Avaliar a efetividade dos mecanismos metabuscadores ao fornecer um mapeamento de evidências com foco em revisões sistemáticas e uma identificação dessas sínteses de evidência para responder questões atreladas à varíola dos macacos para a prática clínica de profissionais de saúde. Métodos: Trata-se de revisão de literatura. Foram pesquisadas cinco ferramentas eletrônicas: Tripdatabase, Epistemonikos, WorldWideScience, Portal Regional BVS e PubMed – Clinical Queries. O foco de busca envolveu apenas as sínteses de evidência em revisões sistemáticas. Foi utilizada a terminologia oficial em língua inglesa nos Descritores em Ciências da Saúde (DeCS) e no Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): Monkeypox. Resultados: Os metabuscadores obtiveram os resultados para a identificação das sínteses: PubMed: 16 revisões sistemáticas; Tripdatabase: 4 revisões sistemáticas, nas quais somente 3, de fato, eram sobre a varíola dos macacos; Epistemonikos: 19 revisões sistemáticas; WorldWideScience: 35 revisões sistemáticas e Portal Regional BVS: 22 revisões sistemáticas. Discussão: A maior sensibilidade das ferramentas metabuscadoras alavancou os resultados, tornando possível um melhor cenário para profissionais de saúde tomarem decisões. Recomenda-se que essas ferramentas sejam utilizadas como rotina nas estratégias de busca. Conclusão: A análise estratégica de busca, a partir da varíola dos macacos, demonstrou que as ferramentas metabuscadoras apresentam excelente abrangência e cobertura no que tange à obtenção das melhores informações científicas, focadas em evidências, recomendando-se sua utilização como fonte inicial para as buscas de evidências e, também, no aprimoramento das perguntas de pesquisa.
References
Farahat RA, Sah R, El-Sakka AA, et al. Human monkeypox disease (MPX). Infez Med. 2022;30(3)372-91. PMID: 36148174; https://doi.org/10.53854/liim-3003-6.
Benites-Zapata VA, Ulloque-Badaracco JR, Alarcon-Braga EA, et al. Clinical features, hospitalisation and deaths associated with monkeypox: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2022;21(1):36. PMID: 35948973; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-022-00527-1.
Rede CIEVS. Centro de Operações em Emergências – COE/ Monkeypox. Disponível em: www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/composicao/. Acessado em 2022 (14 nov).
Dreilinger D, Howe AE. Experiences with selecting search engines using metasearch. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 1997;15(3):195-222. https://doi.org/10.1145/256163.256164.
Pullin A, Frampton G, Jongman R, et al. Selecting appropriate methods of knowledge synthesis to inform biodiversity policy. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2016;25(7):1285-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10531-016-1131-9.
Haddaway N, Pullin AS. Evidence-based conservation and evidence-informed policy: a response to Adams & Sandbrook. Oryx. 2013;47(3):336-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605313000811.
Hartling L, Guise JM, Hempel S, et al. Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):32. PMID: 28212677; https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0425-7.
Shah NB, Wang P, Fraker A, Gastfriend D. Evaluations with impact — Decision-focused impact evaluation as a practical policymaking tool. Working Paper 25. New Delhi: 3ie –International Initiative for Impact Evaluation; 2015. Disponível em: https://www.3ieimpact.org/sites/default/files/2019-01/wp25-evaluations_with_impact.pdf. Acessado em 2022 (24 nov).
Ganann R, Ciliska D, Thomas H. Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. Implement Sci. 2010;5:56. PMID: 20642853; https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-56.
Dobbins, M. Rapid review guidebook. Hamilton: National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools; 2017. Disponível em: https://www.nccmt.ca/tools/rapid-review-guidebook. Acessado em 2022 (24 nov.).
Montori VM, Ebbert JO. TRIP database. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2002;7(4):104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebm.7.4.104.
Meats E, Brassey J, Heneghan C, Glasziou P. Using the Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) database: how do clinicians really search? J Med Libr Assoc. 2007;95(2):156-63. PMID: 17443248; https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.95.2.156.
Warnick W. Federated search as a transformational technology enabling knowledge discovery: the role of WorldWideScience.org. Interlending & document supply. 2010;38(2):82-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/02641611011047150.
Pasha SA, Pasha SA, Kusuma B, Suhasini T. Association between the glycemic variability and mortality in critically ill neurological patients - A hospital based observational study. 2016;3(7):42-49. Disponível em https://www.iaimjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/iaim_2016_0307_07.pdf. Acessado em 2022 (24 nov.).
Lokker C, Haynes RB, Wilczynski NL, McKibbon KA, Walter SD. Retrieval of diagnostic and treatment studies for clinical usethrough PubMed and PubMed’s Clinical Queries filters. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(5):652-9. PMID: 21680559; https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000233.
Pellizzon RF. Pesquisa na área da saúde: 1. Base de dados DeCS (Descritores em Ciências da Saúde). Acta Cir Bras. 2004;19(2):153-63. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502004000200013.
Allan-Blitz LT, Carragher K, Sukhija-Cohen A, et al. Laboratory validation and clinical performance of a saliva-based test for monkeypox virus. J Med Virol. 2022. PMID: 36183189; https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28191.
Almehmadi M, Allahyani M, Alsaiari AA, et al. A glance at the development and patent literature of tecovirimat: the first-in-class therapy for emerging monkeypox outbreak. Viruses. 2022;14(9)1870. PMID: 36146675; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14091870.
Ardila CM, Arrubla-Escobar DE, Vivares-Builes AM. Oral lesions in patients with human monkeypox: A systematic scoping review. J Oral Pathol Med. 2022. PMID: 36263594; https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.13375.
Badenoch JB, Conti I, Rengasamy ER, et al. Neurological and psychiatric presentations associated with human monkeypox virus infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine. 2022;52:101644. PMID: 36246957; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101644.
Beer EM, Rao VB. A systematic review of the epidemiology of human monkeypox outbreaks and implications for outbreak strategy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(10):e0007791. PMID: 31618206; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007791.
Benites-Zapata VA, Ulloque-Badaracco JR, Alarcon-Braga EA, et al. Clinical features, hospitalization and deaths associated with monkeypox: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2022;21(1):36. PMID: 35948973; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-022-00527-1.
Brown K, Leggat PA. Human monkeypox: current state of nowledge and implications for the future. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2016;1(1):8. PMID: 30270859; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed1010008.
Bunge EM, Hoet B, Chen L, et al. The changing epidemiology of human monkeypox-A potential threat? A systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16(2):e0010141. PMID: 35148313; http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010141.
Capobianchi MR, Di Caro A, Piubelli C, et al. Monkeypox 2022 outbreak in non-endemic countries: open questions relevant for public health, nonpharmacological intervention and literature review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:1005955. PMID: 36204640; https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.1005955.
Chauhan RP, Dessie ZG, Noreddin A, El Zowalaty ME. Systematic Review of Important Viral Diseases in Africa in Light of the ‘One Health’ Concept. Pathogens. 2020;9(4):301. PMID: 32325980; http://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040301.
Cho CT, Wenner HA. Monkeypox virus. Bacteriol Rev. 1973;37(1):1-18. PMID: 4349404; https://doi.org/10.1128/br.37.1.1-18.1973.
D’Antonio F, Pagani G, Buca D, Khalil A. Monkeypox infection in pregnancy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;5(1):100747. PMID: 36096413; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100747.
León-Figueroa DA, Barboza JJ, Garcia-Vasquez EA, et al. Epidemiological Situation of Monkeypox Transmission by Possible Sexual Contact: A Systematic Review. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022;7(10):267. PMID: 36288008; http://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7100267.
De Clercq E, Neyts J. Therapeutic potential of nucleoside/nucleotide analogues against poxvirus infections. Rev Med Virol. 2004;14(5):289-300. PMID: 15334537; https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.439.
Di Gennaro F, Veronese N, Marotta C, et al. Human Monkeypox: A Comprehensive Narrative Review and Analysis of the Public Health Implications. Microorganisms. 2022;10(8)1633. PMID: 36014051; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081633.
Hanke T, McMichael AJ, Mwau M, et al. Development of aDNA-MVA/HIVA vaccine for Kenya. Vaccine. 2002;20(15):1995-8. PMID: 11983261; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00085-3.
Jaiswal V, Nain P, Mukherjee D, et al. Symptomatology, prognosis, and clinical findings of Monkeypox infected patients during COVID-19 era: A systematic-review. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2022;10(11):e722. PMID: 36301040; http://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.722.
Kannan S, Shaik Syed Ali P, Sheeza A. Monkeypox: epidemiology, mode of transmission, clinical features, genetic clades and molecular properties. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26(16):5983-90. PMID: 36066176; https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202208_29540.
Kipkorir V, Dhali A, Srichawla B, et al. The re-emerging monkeypox disease. Trop Med Int Health. 2022;27(11):961-9. PMID: 36229989; https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13821.
Kuroda N, Shimizu T, Hirano D, Ishikane M, Kataoka Y. Lack of clinical evidence of antiviral therapy for human monkeypox: A scoping review. J Infect Chemother. 2022;22:S1341-321X(22)00292-6. PMID: 36283609; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2022.10.009.
Essbauer S, Pfeffer M, Meyer H. Zoonotic poxviruses. Vet Microbiol. 2010;140(3-4):229-36. PMID: 19828265; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.08.026.
Pattyn SR. Monkeypoxvirus infections. Rev Sci Tech. 2000;19(1):92-7. PMID: 11189729; https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.19.1.1207.
Pourriyahi H, Aryanian Z, Afshar ZM, Goodarzi A. A systematic review and clinical atlas on mucocutaneous presentations of monkeypox: with a comprehensive approach to all aspects of the new and previous monkeypox outbreaks. J Med Virol. 2022. PMID: 36254380; https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28230.
Reda A, Abdelaal A, Brakat AM, et al. Monkeypox viral detection in semen specimens of confirmed cases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2022;95(1):e28250. PMID: 36271741; https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28250.
Sah R , Abdelaal A , Reda A , et al. Monkeypox viral detection in semen specimens of confirmed cases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2022. Pre-print»ResearchSquare. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1970704/v1.
Sliva K, Schnierle B. From actually toxic to highly specific--novel drugs against poxviruses. Virol J. 2007;4:8. PMID: 17224068; https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422x-4-8.
Silva NIO, de Oliveira JS, Kroon EG, Trindade GS, Drumond BP. Here, There, and Everywhere: The Wide Host Range and Geographic Distribution of Zoonotic Orthopoxviruses. Viruses.2020;13(1):43. PMID: 33396609; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13010043.
Webb E, Rigby I, Michelen M, et al. Availability, scope and quality of monkeypox clinical management guidelines globally: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(8):e009838. PMID: 35973747; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009838.
Yu J, Raj SM. Efficacy of three key antiviral drugs used to treat orthopoxvirus infections: a systematic review. Global Biosecurity. 2019;1(1). http://doi.org/10.31646/gbio.12.
Haynes RB, Wilczynski NL. Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ. 2004;328(7447):1040. PMID: 15073027; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38068.557998.EE.
Wilczynski NL, McKibbon KA, Haynes RB. Sensitive Clinical Queries retrieved relevant systematic reviews as well as primary studies: an analytic survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1341-9. PMID: 21775104; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.007.
Camargo EB, Pereira ACES, Gliardi JM, et al. Judicialização da saúde: onde encontrar respostas e como buscar evidências para melhor instruir processos. Cad Ibero Am Direito Sanit. 2017;6(4):27-40. https://doi.org/10.17566/ciads.v6i4.410.
