Perceptions about penis size among supposedly healthy 40 to 60-year-old Brazilian men
a cross-sectional pilot study
Keywords:
Erectile dysfunction, Sexuality, Body dysmorphic disorders, Penis, PrevalenceAbstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Many men seek medical treatments complaining that their penises are too small (short) when in fact they are not (they are not cases of micropenis). The objective of the present study was to evaluate men’s satisfaction with their own bodies and sex life and the prevalence of erectile dysfunction, among men who were not seeking medical or psychological advice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study in a private, philanthropic hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: In this study, 300 male blood donors aged between 40 and 60 years old answered a question-naire, in privacy, about their sex life and their satisfaction with their own bodies. They were also screened for erectile dysfunction by means of the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire. RESULTS: Seven men (2.3%) reported that they were dissatisfied with their penis size (they thought that it was small), and among these, one was found to have mild erectile dysfunction. However, none of them had sought medical attention. Among these seven, only two had normal body mass index; the other five were overweight (three) or obese (two). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of dissatisfaction with penis size was low. Among the seven dissatisfied men, only one had erectile dysfunction, of mild type, and all of them felt potent.
Downloads
References
Wylie KR, Eardley I. Penile size and the ‘small penis syndrome’. BJU Int. 2007;99(6):1449-55.
Shaeer O, Shaeer K. Impact of penile size on male sexual function and role of penile augmentation surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2012;13(4):285-9.
Gontero P, Di Marco M, Giubilei G, et al. A pilot phase-II prospective study to test the ‘efficacy’ and tolerability of a penile-extender device in the treatment of ‘short penis’. BJU Int. 2009;103(6):793-7.
Wessells H, Lue TF, McAninch JW. Penile length in the flaccid and erect states: guidelines for penile augmentation. J Urol. 1996;156(3):995-7.
Gabrich PN, Vasconcelos JSP, Damião R, Silva EA. Avaliação das medidas do comprimento peniano de crianças e adolescentes [Penile anthropometry in Brazilian child and adolescent]. J Pediatr (Rio J.). 2007;83(5):441-6.
Ghanem H, Glina S, Assalian P, Buvat J. Position paper: Management of men complaining of a small penis despite an actually normal size. J Sex Med. 2013;10(1):294-303.
Mondaini N, Ponchietti R, Gontero P, et al. Penile length is normal in most men seeking penile lengthening procedures. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14(4):283-6.
Shamloul R. Treatment of men complaining of short penis. Urology. 2005;65(6):1183-5.
Vardi Y, Har-Shai Y, Gil T, Gruenwald I. A critical analysis of penile enhancement procedures for patients with normal penile size: surgical techniques, success, and complications. Eur Urol. 2008;54(5):1042-50.
Reis MM, Abdo CH. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction as defined by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and self-reported erectile dysfunction in a sample of Brazilian men who consider themselves healthy. J Sex Marital Ther. 2010;36(1):87-100.
Ferraz MB, Ciconelli JRM. Tradução e adaptação cultural do índice internacional de função erétil para a língua portuguesa [International index of erectile function: cultural adjust and translation of portuguese]. Revista Brasileira de Medicina. 1998;55:35-40. Available from: http://www.moreirajr.com.br/revistas.asp?id_ materia=1669&fase=imprime. Accessed in 2014 (Jan 30).
Söylemez H, Atar M, Sancaktutar AA, et al. Relationship between penile size and somatometric parameters in 2276 healthy young men. Int J Impot Res. 2012;24(3):126-9.
Awwad Z, Abu-Hijleh M, Basri S, et al. Penile measurements in normal adult Jordanians and in patients with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17(2):191-5.
Spyropoulos E, Borousas D, Mavrikos S, et al. Size of external genital organs and somatometric parameters among physically normal men younger than 40 years old. Urology. 2002;60(3):485-9; discussion 490-1.
Lever J, Frederick DA, Peplau LA. Does size matter? Men’s and women’s views on penis size across the lifespan. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2006;7(3):129-43. Available from: http://psycnet.apa. org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=2006-09081-001. Accessed in 2014 (Jan 28).
Zilbergeld B. The new male sexuality. New York: Bantam; 1999.
