Colposcopic triage methods for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 after cytopathological diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

a systematic review on diagnostic tests

Authors

  • Flávia de Miranda Corrêa Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, Criança e Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
  • Fábio Bastos Russomano Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, Criança e Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
  • Caroline Alves de Oliveira Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, Criança e Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

Keywords:

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Triage, Colposcopy, Vaginal smears, DNA probes, HPV, Sensitivity and specificity

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The age-stratified performance of the oncogenic HPV-DNA (human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid) test for triage of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) requires investigation. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the age-stratified performance (cutoff point: 35 years) of oncogenic HPV-DNA testing and repeated cytological tests, for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3), in order to triage for LSIL. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review. Studies were identified in nine electronic databases and in the reference lists of the articles retrieved. METHODS: The eligibility criteria consisted of initial cytological findings of LSIL; subsequent oncogenic HPV-DNA testing and repeated cytological tests; and CIN3 detection. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) guidelines were used for quality assessment. Qualitative information synthesis was performed. RESULTS: Out of 7,776 studies, 284 were identified as pertinent and three fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The CIN3 prevalence ranged from 6% to 12%. The HPV-DNA positivity rate ranged from 64% to 83%; sensitivity for CIN3 detection ranged from 95.2% to 100%; and specificity was available in two studies (27% and 52%). The sensitivity of repeated cytological tests, in relation to the threshold for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), was available in two studies (33% and 90.8%); and specificity was available in one study (53%). CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is no scientific evidence available that would prove that colposcopic triage using oncogenic HPV-DNA testing to detect CIN3 performs better than repeated cytological tests, among women with LSIL aged 35 years and over.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Flávia de Miranda Corrêa, Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, Criança e Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

MD, MSc. Senior Analyst, Cancer Control Program, Divisão de Apoio à Rede de Atenção Oncológica (DARAO), Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Fábio Bastos Russomano, Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, Criança e Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

MD, MSc. Gynecologist and Obstetrician, Hospital Geral de Bonsucesso, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Caroline Alves de Oliveira, Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, Criança e Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

MD, MSc, PhD. Head of Cervical Pathology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, Criança e Adolescente Fernandes Figueira (IFF), Fundação Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

References

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. SISCOLO/SISMAMA. Sistema de Informação do câncer do colo do útero e Sistema de Informação do câncer de mama. Informações estatísticas. Available from: http://w3.datasus.gov.br/siscam/index.php?area=0401. Accessed in 2011 (Aug 9).

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância. Nomenclatura brasileira para laudos cervicais e condutas preconizadas: recomendações para profissionais de saúde. 2a ed. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2006. Available from: http://www1.inca.gov.br/inca/Arquivos/Titulos/Nomenclatura_colo_do_utero.pdf. Accessed in 2011 (Aug 9).

World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Volume 90. Human papillomaviruses. Lyon: IARC Library Cataloguing in Publication Data; 2007.

Cuzick J, Arbyn M, Sankaranarayanan R, et al. Overview of human papillomavirus-based and other novel options for cervical cancer screening in developed and developing countries. Vaccine. 2008;26 Suppl 10:K29-41.

Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;337:a1284.

Solomon D. Chapter 14: Role of triage testing in cervical cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2003;(31):97-101.

ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group. A randomized trial on the management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology interpretations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(6):1393-400.

Arbyn M, Paraskevaidis E, Martin-Hirsch P, Prendiville W, Dillner J. Clinical utility of HPV-DNA detection: triage of minor cervical lesions, follow-up of women treated for high-grade CIN: an update of pooled evidence. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99(3 Suppl 1):S7-11.

Arbyn M, Sasieni P, Meijer CJ, et al. Chapter 9: Clinical applications of HPV testing: a summary of meta-analyses. Vaccine. 2006;24 Suppl 3:S3/78-89.

Cuzick J, Szarewski A, Cubie H, et al. Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: the HART study. Lancet. 2003;362(9399):1871-6.

Kitchener HC, Almonte M, Wheeler P, et al. HPV testing in routine cervical screening: cross sectional data from the ARTISTIC trial. Br J Cancer. 2006;95(1):56-61.

Ronco G, Cuzick J, Segnan N, et al. HPV triage for low grade (L-SIL) cytology is appropriate for women over 35 in mass cervical cancer screening using liquid based cytology. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43(3):476-80.

Schiffman M, Rodríguez AC. Heterogeneity in CIN3 diagnosis. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(5):404-6.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, et al. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(9):944-52.

Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25.

Lytwyn A, Sellors JW, Mahony JB, et al. Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA testing and repeat Papanicolaou test in women with low-grade cervical cytologic abnormalities: a randomized trial. HPV Effectiveness in Lowgrade Paps (HELP) Study No. 1 Group. CMAJ. 2000;163(6):701-7.

Andersson S, Dillner L, Elfgren K, et al. A comparison of the human papillomavirus test and Papanicolaou smear as a second screening method for women with minor cytological abnormalities. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(10):996-1000.

Luff RD. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: report of the 1991 Bethesda workshop. The Bethesda System Editorial Committee. Hum Pathol. 1992;23(7):719-21.

Guide to the graphs in a Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy review. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/mrw_content/cochrane/homepages/guidetographs.pdf?v=1&t=gk5qhyo0&s=6e226d8c64962552738489869354fe3f31f4cae8. Accessed in 2011 (Aug 9).

Schiffman M, Adrianza ME. ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. Design, methods and characteristics of trial participants. Acta Cytol. 2000;44(5):726-42.

Cox JT. History of the use of HPV testing in cervical screening and in the management of abnormal cervical screening results. J Clin Virol. 2009;45 Suppl 1:S3-S12.

Downloads

Published

2012-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Corrêa F de M, Russomano FB, Oliveira CA de. Colposcopic triage methods for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 after cytopathological diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a systematic review on diagnostic tests. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2012 Jan. 1 [cited 2025 Mar. 12];130(1):44-52. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1404

Issue

Section

Systematic Review