The use of the computerized version of quality of life and health status questionnaires in a community sample in southern Brazil

Authors

  • Carlos Zubaran Universidade de Caxias do Sul
  • Ivanor Tres Universidade de Caxias do Sul

Keywords:

Quality of life, Health status, Medical informatics applications, Questionnaires, Brazil

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Computerized data collection is an efficient process and well accepted by patients with different disorders. Although computer-based systems have been used to assess health status and quality of life in various areas of healthcare, there is a lack of studies to investigate the effectiveness of these instruments in Brazil. The aims here were to assess the usability of the Portuguese-language versions of the Personal Health Scale (PHS) and the Multicultural Quality of Life Index (MQLI) in southern Brazil and to determine the correlation between these two questionnaires. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a cross-sectional community-based survey in which participants completed computerized versions of these two questionnaires. METHODS: In a survey conducted in 16 different locations, 458 volunteers completed both questionnaires. Pearson correlation coefficients were generated between the scores of the two questionnaires. The inclusion criteria allowed all volunteers who were able to understand the questions in both questionnaires to participate in the study. RESULTS: The percentage of proper data collection via the computerized versions of the two questionnaires combined was 97.45%. A significant correlation (P < 0.01) between the PHS and the MQLI was observed. CONCLUSION: The computerized versions of the PHS and MQLI demonstrated efficient data collection patterns during the field survey trials. Healthrelated issues were significantly correlated with the overall experience of wellbeing and quality of life. The computerized versions of the PHS and MQLI are valid tools for research and clinical use in Brazil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carlos Zubaran, Universidade de Caxias do Sul

MD, PhD. Conjoint associate professor, Department of Psychiatry, Blacktown Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Australia.

Ivanor Tres, Universidade de Caxias do Sul

Researcher, School of Physical Education, Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS), Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

References

Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(3):193-205.

von Engelhardt D. Patient vs. disease in medicine: Historical perspectives and contemporary concerns. J Nephrol. 2004;17(4):611-8.

Mezzich JE, Ruipérez MA, Pérez C, et al. The Spanish version of the quality of life index: presentation and validation. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2000;188(5):301-5.

Thompson DR, Roebuck A. The measurement of health-related quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2001;16(1):28-33

Treasure T. The measurement of health related quality of life. Heart. 1999;81(4):331-2

Guyatt GH. A taxonomy of health status instruments. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(6):1188-90.

Le PP, Kohane IS, Weeks JC. Using a pen-based computer to collect health-related quality of life and utilities information. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:839-43.

Kvien TK, Mowinckel P, Heiberg T, et al. Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(10):1480-4.

Kvien TK, Uhlig T. Quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2005;34(5):333-41.

Bush N, Donaldson G, Moinpour C, et al. Development, feasibility and compliance of a web-based system for very frequent QOL and symptom home self-assessment after hema- topoietic stem cell transplantation. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(1):77-93.

Gaertner J, Elsner F, Pollmann-Dahmen K, Radbruch L, Sabatowski R. Electronic pain diary: a randomized crossover study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004;28(3):259-67.

Wilson AS, Kitas GD, Carruthers DM, et al. Computerized information-gathering in specialist rheumatology clinics: an initial evaluation of an electronic version of the Short Form 36. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002;41(3):268-73.

Drummond HE, Ghosh S, Ferguson A, Brackenridge D, Tiplady B. Electronic quality of life questionnaires: a comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study. Qual Life Res. 1995;4(1):21-6.

Lane SJ, Heddle NM, Arnold E, Walker I. A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:23.

Walker I, Sigouin C, Sek J, et al. Comparing hand-held computers and paper diaries for haemophilia home therapy: a randomized trial. Haemophilia. 2004;10(6):698-704.

Vieweg BW, DiFranco B. The use of automated assessment with seriously mentally ill clients. Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1995;4(1):37-41.

VanDenKerkhof EG, Goldstein DH, Blaine WC, Rimmer MJ. A comparison of paper with electronic patient-completed questionnaires in a preoperative clinic. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(4):1075-80.

DeVore PA. A computerized geriatric assessment designed for use in primary care physi- cians’ offices. Md Med J. 1994;43(3):257-64.

Carlson LE, Speca M, Hagen N, Taenzer P. Computerized quality-of-life screening in a cancer pain clinic. J Palliat Care. 2001;17(1):46-52.

Taenzer PA, Speca M, Atkinson MJ, et al. Computerized quality-of-life screening in an onco- logy clinic. Cancer Pract. 1997;5(3):168-75.

Taenzer P, Bultz BD, Carlson LE, et al. Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psychooncology. 2000;9(3):203-13.

Zubaran C, Persch K, Tarso D, Ioppi AE, Mezzich J. The Portuguese version of the personal health scale: a validation study in southern Brazil. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2007;62(4):419-26.

Zubaran C, Persch KN, Tarso D, Ioppi AEE, Mezzich JE. Estudo inicial para o desenvolvimento da versão em português do índice multicultural de qualidade de vida [Initial study for the development of the portuguese version of the multicultural quality of life index]. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psiquiatria, Neurologia e Medicina Legal. 2004;98(3). Available from: http:// www.aperjrio.org.br/publicacoes/revista/2004/estudo.asp. Accessed in 2010 (Nov 4).

Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417-32.

Zubaran C, Persch K, Tarso D, Ioppi AE, Mezzich J. The correlation between health status and quality of life in southern Brazil [A correlação entre estado de saúde e qualidade de vida no sul do Brasil]. Sao Paulo Med J. 2008;126(5):257-61.

Terreehorst I, Duivenvoorden HJ, Tempels-Pavlica Z, et al. Comparison of a generic and a rhinitis-specific quality-of-life (QOL) instrument in patients with house dust mite al- lergy: relationship between the SF-36 and Rhinitis QOL Questionnaire. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34(11):1673-7.

Lutner RE, Roizen MF, Stocking CB, et al. The automated interview versus the personal interview. Do patient responses to preoperative health questions differ? Anesthesiology. 1991;75(3):394-400.

Downloads

Published

2011-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Zubaran C, Tres I. The use of the computerized version of quality of life and health status questionnaires in a community sample in southern Brazil. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2011 Jan. 1 [cited 2025 Mar. 12];129(1):36-40. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1543

Issue

Section

Original Article