Epidural versus intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia following orthopedic surgery
randomized controlled trial
Keywords:
Analgesia, Analgesia, epidural, Fentanyl, Pharmacology, OrthopedicsAbstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Controversy exists regarding the site of action of fentanyl after epidural injection. The objective of this investigation was to compare the efficacy of epidural and intravenous fentanyl for orthopedic surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomized double-blind study was performed in Hospital São Paulo. METHODS: During the postoperative period, in the presence of pain, 29 patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 14) received 100 µg of fentanyl epidurally and 2 ml of saline intravenously; group 2 (n = 15) received 5 ml of saline epidurally and 100 µg of fentanyl intravenously. The analgesic supplementation consisted of 40 mg of tenoxicam intravenously and, if necessary, 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine epidurally. Pain intensity was evaluated on a numerical scale and plasma concentrations of fentanyl were measured simultaneously. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who required supplementary analgesia with tenoxicam was lower in group 1 (71.4%) than in group 2 (100%): 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.001-0.4360 (P = 0.001, Fisher’s exact test; relative risk, RR = 0.07). Epidural bupivacaine supplementation was also lower in group 1 (14.3%) than in group 2 (53.3%): 95% CI = 0.06-1.05 (P = 0.03, Fisher’s exact test; RR = 0.26). There was no difference in pain intensity on the numerical scale. Mean fentanyl plasma concentrations were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Intravenous and epidural fentanyl appear to have similar efficacy for reducing pain according to the numerical scale, but supplementary analgesia was needed less frequently when epidural fentanyl was used. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00635986
Downloads
References
Wang JK, Nauss LA, Thomas JE. Pain relief by intrathecally applied morphine in man. Anes- thesiology. 1979;50(2):149-51.
Coda BA, Brown MC, Schaffer R, et al. Pharmacology of epidural fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil in volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1994;81(5):1149-61.
Sandler AN, Stringer D, Panos L, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of lumbar epidural and intravenous fentanyl infusions for postthoracotomy pain relief. Analgesic, phar- macokinetic, and respiratory effects. Anesthesiology. 1992;77(4):626-34.
Thomson CA, Becker DR, Messick JM Jr, et al. Analgesia after thoracotomy: effects of epidu- ral fentanyl concentration/infusion rate. Anesth Analg. 1995;81(5):973-81.
Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27(1):117-26.
Mularski RA, White-Chu F, Overbay D, Miller L, Asch SM, Ganzini L. Measuring pain as the 5th vital sign does not improve quality of pain management. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21(6):607-12.
Justins DM, Francis D, Houlton PG, Reynolds F. A controlled trial of extradural fentanyl in labor. Br J Anaesth. 1982;54(4):409-14.
Reynolds F, O’Sullivan G. Epidural fentanyl and perineal pain in labour. Anaesthesia. 1989;44(4):341-4.
Renaud B, Brichant JF, Clergue F, Chauvin M, Levron JC, Viars P. Ventilatory effects of conti- nuous epidural infusion of fentanyl. Anesth Analg. 1988;67(10):971-5.
Ellis DJ, Millar WL, Reisner LS. A randomized double-blind comparison of epidural ver- sus intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia after cesarean section. Anesthesiology. 1990;72(6):981-6.
Loper KA, Ready LB, Downey M, et al. Epidural and intravenous fentanyl infusions are clini- cally equivalent after knee surgery. Anesth Analg. 1990;70(1):72-5.
Salomäki TE, Laitinen JO, Nuutinen LS. A randomized double-blind comparison of epidu- ral versus intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia after thoracotomy. Anesthesiology. 1991;75(5):790-5.
Welchew EA, Breen DP. Patient-controlled on-demand epidural fentanyl. A comparison of patient-controlled on-demand fentanyl delivered epidurally or intravenously. Anaesthesia. 1991;46(6):438-41.
Guinard JP, Mavrocordatos P, Chiolero R, Carpenter RL. A randomized comparison of in- travenous versus lumbar and thoracic epidural fentanyl for analgesia after thoracotomy. Anesthesiology. 1992;77(6):1108-15.
Glass PS, Estok P, Ginsberg B, Goldberg JS, Sladen RN. Use of patient-controlled analgesia to compare the efficacy of epidural to intravenous fentanyl administration. Anesth Analg. 1992;74(3):345-51.
Grant RP, Dolman JF, Harper JA, et al. Patient-controlled lumbar epidural fentanyl compa- red with patient-controlled intravenous fentanyl for post-thoracotomy pain. Can J Anaesth. 1992;39(3):214-9.
Baxter AD, Laganière S, Samson B, Stewart J, Hull K, Goernert L. A comparison of lumbar epidural and intravenous fentanyl infusions for post-thoracotomy analgesia. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41(3):184-91.
Cooper DW, Ryall DM, Desira WR. Extradural fentanyl for postoperative analgesia: predomi- nant spinal or systemic action? Br J Anaesth. 1995;74(2):184-7.
Liu SS, Gerancher JC, Bainton BG, Kopacz DJ, Carpenter RL. The effects of electrical stimu- lation at different frequencies on perception and pain in human volunteers: epidural versus intravenous administration of fentanyl. Anesth Analg. 1996;82(1):98-102.
D’Angelo R, Gerancher JC, Eisenach JC, Raphael BL. Epidural fentanyl produces labor anal- gesia by a spinal mechanism. Anesthesiology. 1998;88(6):1519-23.
Panos L, Sandler AN, Stringer DG, Badner N, Lawson S, Koren G. Continuous infusions of lumbar epidural fentanyl and intravenous fentanyl for post-thoracotomy pain relief. I: Anal- gesic and pharmacokinetic effects. Can J Anaesth. 1990;37(4 Pt 2):S66.
Austin KL, Stapleton JV, Mather LE. Relationship between blood meperidine concentrations and analgesic response: a preliminary report. Anesthesiology. 1980;53(6):460-6.
Tamsen A, Hartvig P, Fagerlund C, Dahlström B. Patient-controlled analgesic therapy, Part II: Individual analgesic demand and analgesic plasma concentrations of pethidine in postope- rative pain. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1982;7(2):164-75.
Dahlström B, Tamsen A, Paalzow L, Hartvig P. Patient-controlled analgesic therapy, Part IV: pharmacokinetics and analgesic plasma concentrations of morphine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1982;7(3):266-79.
