Prevalence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and cervical cancer among patients with unsatisfactory colposcopic examination, without visible lesion
Keywords:
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Carcinoma, Colposcopy, Conization, Public HealthAbstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer is a serious public health problem in Brazil. For patients with unsatisfactory colposcopic examinations without visible lesions, but with cervical cytological tests suggesting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), the national recommendation is to repeat cervical cytological tests after three months. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of HSIL and cancer among patients with initial cervical cytological tests suggestive of HSIL but with unsatisfactory colposcopic examinations without visible lesions, in order to contribute towards the discussion regarding a more effective clinical approach that might diminish the likelihood of patient abandonment of follow-up before appropriate diagnosis and treatment. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study in Colposcopy Clinic of IFF/Fiocruz. METHOD: Patients admitted between December 1989 and April 2007 with cytological diagnoses of HSIL but with unsatisfactory colposcopic examinations without visible lesions underwent cervical cone biopsy. RESULTS: Sixty-five such patients were included, comprising 33.8% with HSIL and 4.6% with cancer, confirmed histologically. The other patients presented low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (26.1%), glandular dysplasia (1.5%) and absence of disease (33.8%). CONCLUSION: The observed prevalence of cancer and HSIL does not seem to be enough to justify immediate referral for cone biopsies to investigate the cervical canal in these cases. The findings suggest that the recommendation of repeated cytological tests following an initial one with HSIL, among patients with unsatisfactory colposcopic examinations without visible lesions, is appropriate in our setting. Efforts are needed to ensure adherence to follow-up protocols in order to reduce the chances of losses.
Downloads
References
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância de Câncer. Estimativas 2008: Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro. INCA. Available from: http://www.inca.gov.br/estimativa/2008/versaofinal.pdf. Accessed in 2009 (Oct 20).
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância. Nomenclatura brasileira para laudos cervicais e condutas preconizadas - Recomendações para profissionais de saúde [Brazilian nomen- clature for cervical cytology reports and guidelines]. Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia. 2006;52(3):213-36. Available from: http://www.inca.gov.br/rbc/n_52/v03/pdf/normas_recomendacoes.pdf. Accessed in 2009 (Oct 20).
Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, et al. 2006 consensus guidelines for the manage- ment of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(4):346-55.
Massad LS,Tate N, Cejtin E, Collins YC. Quantifying the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with unsatisfactory colposcopy results. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005;9(1):23-8.
Lapin GA, Derchain SF, Tambascia J. Comparação entre a colpocitologia oncológica de en- caminhamento e a da gravidade das lesões cervicais intra-epiteliais [Oncologic colpocytology collected in the public health and reference services in the diagnostic of the severity of intraepithelial cervical lesion]. Rev Saúde Pública = J Public Health. 2000;34(2):120-5.
Andersen ES, Nielsen K, Pedersen B. The reliability of preconization diagnostic evaluation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;59(1):143-7.
Massad LS, Collins YC, Meyer PM. Biopsy correlates of abnormal cervical cytology classified using the Bethesda system. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;82(3):516-22.
Insinga RP, Glass AG, Rush BB. Diagnoses and outcomes in cervical cancer screening: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):105-13.
Gupta S, Sodhani P, Halder K, Chachra KL, Singh V, Sehgal A. Age trends in pre-cancerous and cancerous lesions of the uterine cervix in a cytology screening programme: what should be the target age group for a major thrust of screening in resource-limited settings? Cytopa- thology. 2008;19(2):106-10.
Melnikow J, Nuovo J, Willan AR, Chan BK, Howell LP. Natural history of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(4 Pt 2):727-35.
