Clinical formulas, mother’s opinion and ultrasound in predicting birth weight
Keywords:
Fetal weight, Ultrasonography, prenatal, Birth weight, Uterus, Organ sizeAbstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Accurate fetal weight estimation is important for labor and delivery management. So far, there has not been any conclusive evidence to indicate that any technique for fetal weight estimation is superior to any other. Clinical formulas for fetal weight estimation are easy to use but have not been extensively studied in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of clinical formulas for fetal weight estimation compared to maternal and ultrasound estimates. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study involving 100 full-term, cephalic, singleton pregnancies delivered within three days of fetal weight estimation. The setting was a tertiary public teaching hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: Upon admission, the mother’s opinion about fetal weight was recorded. Symphyseal-fundal height and abdominal girth were measured and two formulas were used to calculate fetal weight. An ultrasound scan was then performed by a specialist to estimate fetal weight. The four estimates were compared with the birth weight. The accuracy of the estimates was assessed by calculating the percentage that was within 10% of actual birth weight for each method. The chi-squared test was used for comparisons and p < 0.05 was considered signifi cant. RESULTS: The birth weight was correctly estimated (± 10%) in 59%, 57%, 61%, and 65% of the cases using the mother’s estimate, two clinical formulas, and ultrasound estimate, respectively. The accuracy of the four methods did not differ signifi cantly. CONCLUSION: Clinical formulas for fetal weight prediction are as accurate as maternal and ultrasound estimates.
Downloads
References
Chauhan SP, Lutton PM, Bailey KJ, Guerrieri JP, Morrison JC. Intrapartum clinical, sonographic, and parous patients’ estimates of newborn birth weight. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79(6):956-8.
Raman S, Urquhart R, Yusof M. Clinical versus ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;32(3):196-9.
Herrero RL, Fitzsimmons J. Estimated fetal weight. Maternal vs. physician estimate. J Reprod Med. 1999;44(8):674-8.
Baum JD, Gussman D, Wirth JC 3rd. Clinical and patient estimation of fetal weight vs. ultrasound estimation. J Reprod Med. 2002;47(3):194-8.
Johnson RW, Toshach CE. Estimation of fetal weight using longi- tudinal mensuration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1954;68(3):891-6.
Dare FO, Ademowore AS, Ifaturoti OO, Nganwuchu A. The value of symphysio-fundal height/abdominal girth measure- ments in predicting fetal weight. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990;31(3):243-8.
Cury AF, Garcia SAL. Estimativa do peso fetal: comparação entre um método clínico e a ultra-sonografia. [Estimation of fetal weight: comparison between a clinical method and ultra- sonography]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 1998;20(10):551-5.
Banerjee K, Mittal S, Kumar S. Clinical vs. ultrasound evaluation of fetal weight. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;86(1):41-3.
Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(3):333-7.
Sauceda González LF, Ramírez Sordo J, Riviera Flores S, Falcón Martínez JC, Zarain Llaguno F. Estudio multicéntrico de predic- ción clínica del peso fetal en embarazos de término. [Multicenter study of fetal weight estimation in term pregnancies]. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2003;71:174-80.
Diase K, Monga M. Maternal estimates of neonatal birth weight in diabetic patients. South Med J. 2002;95(1):92-4.
Azziz R, Smith S, Fabro S. The development and use of a stan- dard symphysial-fundal height growth curve in the prediction of small for gestational age neonates. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1988;26(1):81-7.
Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, Morrison JC, Kenney SP, Devoe LD. Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: experience with 1034 parturients. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91(1):72-7.
Hernández Moreno MJ, Vargas García C, Vera Gaspar D, Casanova Alvarez N, Manzanilla Sevilla R. [Evaluation of the clinical method of Johnson and Toshach for calculating fetal weight]. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1985;53(335):63-7.
Hernández-Castro F, Laredo-Rodríguez A, Hernández-Herrera
R. [Sensitivity and predictive value of the Johnson and Toshach method to estimate fetal weight]. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2006;44(4):309-12.
Valenzuela Tinoco E, Puente González H, de Dios Maldonado Alvarado J. Predicción del peso fetal mediante la técnica de Johnson y Toshach. [Prediction of fetal weight by the Johnson- Toshach method]. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1998;66:420-2.
Noumi G, Collado-Khoury F, Bombard A, Julliard K, Weiner
Z. Clinical and sonographic estimation of fetal weight per- formed during labor by residents. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1407-9.
Nahum GG, Stanislaw H. Ultrasonographic prediction of term birth weight: how accurate is it? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(2):566-74.
Chauhan SP, Sullivan CA, Lutton TC, Magann EF, Morrison JC. Parous patients’ estimate of birth weight in postterm pregnancy. J Perinatol. 1995;15(3):192-4.
Farrell T, Holmes R, Stone P. The effect of body mass index on three methods of fetal weight estimation. BJOG. 2002;109(6):651-7.
Hendrix NW, Grady CS, Chauhan SP. Clinical vs. sonographic estimate of birth weight in term parturients. A randomized clinical trial. J Reprod Med. 2000;45(4):317-22.
Barnhard Y, Bar-Hava I, Divon MY. Accuracy of intrapartum estimates of fetal weight. Effect of oligohydramnios. J Reprod Med. 1996;41(12):907-10.
Ben-Aroya Z, Segal D, Hadar A, et al. Effect of OB/GYN resi- dents’ fatigue and training level on the accuracy of fetal weight estimation. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2002;17(3):177-81.
Humphries J, Reynolds D, Bell-Scarbrough L, Lynn N, Scardo JA, Chauhan SP. Sonographic estimate of birth weight: relative accuracy of sonographers versus maternal-fetal medicine special- ists. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;11(2):108-12.
Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(1):80-9.
