Methylene blue for clinical anaphylaxis treatment

a case report

Authors

  • Janine Moreira Rodrigues Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo
  • Antonio Pazin Filho Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo
  • Alfredo José Rodrigues Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo
  • Walter Vilella de Andrade Vicente Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo
  • Paulo Roberto Barbosa Evora Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo

Keywords:

Anaphylaxis, Nitric oxide, Methylene blue, Guanylate cyclase, Cyclic GMP

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Nitric oxide has a pathophysiological role in modulating systemic changes associated with anaphylaxis. Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors may exacerbate bronchospasm in anaphylaxis and worsen clinical conditions, with limited roles in anaphylactic shock treatment. The aim here was to report an anaphylaxis case (not anaphylactic shock), reversed by methylene blue (MB), a guanylyl cyclase inhibitor. CASE REPORT: A 23-year-old female suddenly presented urticaria and pruritus, initially on her face and arms, then over her whole body. Oral antihistamine was administered initially, but without improvement in symptoms and signs until intravenous methylprednisolone 500 mg. Recurrence occurred after two hours, plus vomiting. Associated upper respiratory distress, pulmonary sibilance, laryngeal stridor and facial angioedema (including erythema and lip edema) marked the evolution. At sites with severe pruritus, petechial lesions were observed. The clinical situation worsened, with dyspnea, tachypnea, peroral cyanosis, laryngeal edema with severe expiratory dyspnea and deepening unconsciousness. Conventional treatment was ineffective. Intubation and ventilatory support were then considered, because of severe hypoventilation. But, before doing that, based on our previous experience, 1.5 mg/kg (120 mg) bolus of 4% MB was infused, followed by one hour of continuous infusion of another 120 mg diluted in dextrose 5% in water. Following the initial intravenous MB dose, the clinical situation reversed completely in less than 20 minutes, thereby avoiding tracheal intubation. CONCLUSION: Although the nitric oxide hypothesis for MB effectiveness discussed here remains unproven, our intention was to share our accumulated cohort experience, which strongly suggests MB is a lifesaving treatment for anaphylactic shock and/or anaphylaxis and other vasoplegic conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Janine Moreira Rodrigues, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo

MD. Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

Antonio Pazin Filho, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo

MD, PhD. Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

Alfredo José Rodrigues, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo

MD, PhD. Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

Walter Vilella de Andrade Vicente, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo

MD, PhD. Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Paulo Roberto Barbosa Evora, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo

MD, PhD. Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

References

Mitsuhata H, Shimizu R, Yokoyama MM. Role of nitric oxide in anaphylactic shock. J Clin Immunol. 1995;15(6):277-83.

Evora PR, Roselino CH, Schiavetto PM. Methylene blue in anaphylactic shock. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;30(2):240.

Oliveira Neto AM, Duarte NM, Vicente WV, Viaro F, Evora PR. Methylene blue: an effective treatment for contrast medium- induced anaphylaxis. Med Sci Monit. 2003;9(11):CS102-6.

Buzato MA, Viaro F, Piccinato CE, Evora PR. The use of methylene blue in the treatment of anaphylactic shock induced by compound 48/80: experimental studies in rabbits. Shock. 2005;23(6):582-7.

Menardi AC. Azul de metileno na prevenção e tratamento do choque anafilático induzido pelo composto 48/80, em porcas: estudo clínico, hemodinâmico, bioquímico e da reatividade vascular in vitro. [Methylene blue in the prevention and treat- ment of anaphylactic shock induced by Compound 48/80 in pigs: Clinical hemodynamic, biochemical and in vitro vascular reactivity]. [Thesis]. Ribeirão Preto: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo; 2005.

Downloads

Published

2007-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Rodrigues JM, Pazin Filho A, Rodrigues AJ, Vicente WV de A, Evora PRB. Methylene blue for clinical anaphylaxis treatment: a case report. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2007 Jan. 1 [cited 2025 Oct. 15];125(1):60-2. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/2046

Issue

Section

Case Report