Thoracic sympathetic block reduces respiratory system compliance

Authors

  • Fábio Ely Martins Benseñor Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Joaquim Edson Vieira Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Jose Otávio Costa Auler Júnior Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Keywords:

Epidural anesthesia, Autonomic nerve block, Respiratory mechanics, physiology, Lung compliance, Airway resistance

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) following thoracic surgery presents known analgesic and respiratory benefi ts. However, intraoperative thoracic sympathetic block may trigger airway hyperreactivity. This study weighed up these benefi cial and undesirable effects on intraoperative respiratory mechanics. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, doubleblind clinical study at a tertiary public hospital. METHODS: Nineteen patients scheduled for partial lung resection were distributed using a random number table into groups receiving active TEA (15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine, n = 9) or placebo (15 ml 0.9% saline, n = 10) solutions that also contained 1:200,000 epinephrine and 2 mg morphine. Under general anesthesia, fl ows and airway and esophageal pressures were recorded. Pressure-volume curves, lower infl ection points (LIP), resistance and compliance at 10 ml/kg tidal volume were established for respiratory system, chest wall and lungs. Student’s t test was performed, including confi - dence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Bupivacaine rose 5 ± 1 dermatomes upwards and 6 ± 1 downwards. LIP was higher in the bupivacaine group (6.2 ± 2.3 versus 3.6 ± 0.6 cmH2O, p = 0.016, CI = -3.4 to -1.8). Respiratory system and lung compliance were higher in the placebo group (respectively 73.3 ± 10.6 versus 51.9 ± 15.5, p = 0.003, CI = 19.1 to 23.7; 127.2 ± 31.7 versus 70.2 ± 23.1 ml/cmH2O, p < 0.001, CI = 61 to 53). Resistance and chest wall compliance showed no difference. CONCLUSION: TEA decreased respiratory system compliance by reducing its lung component. Resistance was unaffected. Under TEA, positive end-expiratory pressure and recruitment maneuvers are advisable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Fábio Ely Martins Benseñor, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

MD, PhD. Attending physician, Anesthesia Department, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Joaquim Edson Vieira, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

MD, PhD. Attending physician, Anesthesia Department, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Jose Otávio Costa Auler Júnior, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

MD, PhD. Full professor, Anesthesia Department, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

References

Zwissler B. Editorial: Thoracic anesthesia. In: Barash PG, Van Aken H, editors. Current opinion in anaesthesiology. Philadel- phia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 47-9.

Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, et al. Reduction of post- operative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000;321(7275):1493.

Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, deFerranti S, et al. The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(3):598-612.

Wang CY, Ong GS. Severe bronchospasm during epidural anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1993;48(6):514-5.

McGough EK, Cohen JA. Unexpected bronchospasm during spinal anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 1990;2(1):35-6.

Groeben H, Schwalen A, Irsfeld S, Tarnow J, Lipfert P, Hopf HB. High thoracic epidural anesthesia does not alter airway resistance and attenuates the response to an inhalational provocation test in patients with bronchial hyperreactivity. Anesthesiology. 1994;81(4):868-74.

Groeben H. Effects of high thoracic epidural anesthesia and local anesthetics on bronchial hyperreactivity. J Clin Monit Comput. 2000;16(5-6):457-63.

Rodriguez L, Marquer B, Mardrus P, et al. A new simple method to perform pressure-volume curves obtained under quasi-static conditions during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25(2):173-9.

Lu Q, Vieira SR, Richecoeur J, et al. A simple automated method for measuring pressure-volume curves during mechanical venti- lation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159(1):275-82.

Benseñor FE, Vieira JE, Auler JO Jr. Guidelines for inspiratory flow setting when measuring the pressure-volume relationship. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(1):145-50.

D’Angelo E, Robatto FM, Calderini E, et al. Pulmonary and chest wall mechanics in anesthetized paralyzed humans. J Appl Physiol. 1991;70(6):2602-10.

Reta GS, Riva JA, Piriz H, Medeiros AS, Rocco PR, Zin WA. Effects of halothane on respiratory mechanics and lung histo- pathology in normal rats. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84(3):372-7.

Auler JO Jr, Miyoshi E, Fernandes CR, Benseñor FE, Elias L, Bonassa J. The effects of abdominal opening on respira- tory mechanics during general anesthesia in normal and morbidly obese patients: a comparative study. Anesth Analg. 2002;94(3):741-8.

Baydur A, Behrakis PK, Zin WA, Jaeger M, Milic-Emily J. A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal bal- loon technique. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982;126(5):788-91.

Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Avalli L, Rossi F, Bombino M. Pressure- volume curve of total respiratory system in acute respiratory failure. Computed tomographic scan study. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;136(3):730-6.

Neder JA, Andreoni S, Castelo-Filho A, Nery LE. Reference values for lung function tests. I. Static volumes. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1999;32(6):703-17.

Hedenstierna G, Rothen HU. Atelectasis formation during anesthesia: causes and measures to prevent it. J Clin Monit Comput. 2000;16(5-6):329-35.

Oczenski W, Schwarz S, Fitzgerald RD. Vital capacity manoeu- vre in general anaesthesia: useful or useless? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21(4):253-9

Hedenstierna G. Alveolar collapse and closure of airways: regular effects of anaesthesia. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2003;23(3):123-9.

Magnusson L, Spahn DR. New concepts of atelectasis during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91(1):61-72.

Tokics L, Hedenstierna G, Strandberg A, Brismar B, Lundquist H. Lung collapse and gas exchange during general anesthesia: effects of spontaneous breathing, muscle paralysis, and positive end-expiratory pressure. Anesthesiology. 1987;66(2):157-67.

Hachenberg T, Holst D, Ebel C, et al. Effect of thoracic epidural anaesthesia on ventilation-perfusion distribution and intrathoracic blood volume before and after induction of general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;41(9):1142-8.

D’Angelo E, Prandi E, Tavola M, Calderini E, Milic-Emily J. Chest wall interrupter resistance in anesthetized paralyzed humans. J Appl Physiol. 1994;77(2):883-7.

Dolhnikoff M, Morin J, Ludwig MS. Human lung parenchyma responds to contractile stimulation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(5 Pt 1):1607-12.

Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, Wegenius G, Hedenstierna G. Airway closure, atelectasis and gas exchange during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81(5):681-6.

Downloads

Published

2007-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Benseñor FEM, Vieira JE, Auler Júnior JOC. Thoracic sympathetic block reduces respiratory system compliance. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2007 Jan. 1 [cited 2025 Oct. 15];125(1):9-14. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/2057

Issue

Section

Original Article