Computerized videodefecography versus defecography
do we need radiographs?
Keywords:
Defecography, Physiology, Anus, Radiation, Colorectal surgeryAbstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Defecography has been recognized as a valuable method for evaluating patients with evacuation disorders. It consists of the use of static radiography and fluoroscopy to record different situations within anorectal dynamics. Conventionally, rectal pa- rameters are measured using radiograms. It is rare for fluoroscopy alone to be used. Computer software has been developed with the specific aim of calculating these measurements from digitized videotaped images obtained during fluoroscopy, without the need for radiographic film, thereby developing a computerized videodefecography method. The objective was thus to compare measurements obtained via computerized videodefecography with conventional measurements and to discuss the advantages of the new method. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study at the radiology service of Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo. METHOD: Ten consecutive normal subjects underwent videodefecography. The anorectal angle, anorectal junction, puborectalis muscle length, anal canal length and degree of anal relaxation were obtained via the conventional method (using radiography film) and via computerized videodefecography using the ANGDIST software. Measurement and analysis of these parameters was performed by two independent physicians. RESULTS: Statistical analysis confirmed that the measurements obtained through direct radiog- raphy film assessment and using digital image analysis (computerized videodefecography) were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized videodefecography is equivalent to the traditional defecography examination. It has the advantage of offering reduced radiation exposure through saving on the use of radiography.
Downloads
References
Walldén L. Defecation block in cases of deep rectogenital pouch; a surgical roentgenological and embryological study with special reference to morphological conditions.. Acta Chir Scand. 1952;165:1-122.
Sobrado Junior CW. Contribuição da videodefecografia di- nâmica computadorizada no estudo de doentes submetidos à graciloplastia. [thesis] São Paulo (SP): Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; 1999.
Goei R. Defecography: principles of technique and interpreta- tion. Radiologe. 1993;33(6):356-60.
Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography: I. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol. 1984;9(3):247-51.
Wiersma TG, Mulder CJ, Reeders JW, Tytgat GN, Van Waes PF. Dynamic rectal examination (defecography). Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1994;8(4)729-41.
Jorge JM, Habr-Gama A, Wexner SD. Clinical applications and techniques of cinedefecography. Am J Surg. 2001;182(1):93-101.
Curi LA, Maurizi M. Valor diagnóstico de la defecografia. [Di- agnostic value of defecography]. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoamer. 2001;31(4):313-7.
Karlbom U, Nilsson S, Pahlman L, Graf W. Defecographic study of rectal evacuation in constipated patients and control subjects. Radiology. 1999;210(1):103-8.
Goei R, Kemerink G. Radiation dose in defecography. Radiol- ogy. 1990;176(1):137-9.
Parry RA, Glaze SA, Archer BR. The AAPM/RSNA physics tuto- rial for residents. Typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiology. Radiographics. 1999;19(5):1289-302.
Zonca G, De Thomatis A, Marchesini R, et al. Dose assorbita dalle gonadi dei pazienti adulti sottoposti a studio defeco- grafico con acquisizione radiografica digitale o tradizionale [The absorbed dose to the gonads in adult patients undergoing defecographic study by digital or traditional radiographic imag- ing]. Radiol Med (Torino). 1997;94(5):520-3.
