Impact of treatment for bacterial vaginosis on prematurity among Brazilian pregnant women

a retrospective cohort study

Authors

  • Rodrigo Pauperio Soares de Camargo Universidade Estadual de Campinas
  • José Antonio Simões Universidade Estadual de Campinas
  • José Guilherme Cecatti Universidade Estadual de Campinas
  • Valéria Moraes Nader Alves Universidade Estadual de Campinas
  • Sebastian Faro Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Keywords:

Bacterial vaginosis, Pregnancy, Premature infant, Perinatal care, Pregnancy complications

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Bacterial vaginosis has been associated with prematurity and other perinatal complications. However, the efficacy of the treatment for preventing such complications has not yet been well established. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of treatment for bacterial vaginosis on a low-risk population of Brazilian pregnant women, in order to prevent prematurity and other perinatal complications. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational retrospec- tive cohort study, at the Obstetric and Gynecology Department, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp). METHODS: Vaginal bacterioscopy results from 785 low-risk pregnant women were studied. Three different groups of women were identified: 580 without bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy, 134 with bacterial vaginosis treated using imidazoles (metronidazole, tinidazole, or secnidazole) during pregnancy, and 71 with bacterial vaginosis not treated during pregnancy. The diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis was based on Nugent’s criteria, from the vaginal bacterioscopy performed during the first prenatal care visit. RESULTS: The frequency of prematurity was 5.5% among the women without bacterial vaginosis, 22.5% among those with untreated bacterial vaginosis and 3.7% among those with treated bacterial vaginosis. The risk ratios for perinatal complications were significantly higher in the group with untreated bacterial vaginosis: premature rupture of membranes, 7.5 (95% CI: 1.9-34.9); preterm labor, 3.4 (95% CI: 1.4-8.1); preterm birth, 6.0 (95% CI: 1.9-19.7); and low birth weight, 4.2 (95% CI: 1.2-14.3). CONCLUSION: The treatment of bacterial vagino- sis significantly reduced the rates of prematurity and other perinatal complications among these low-risk Brazilian pregnant women, regardless of the history of previous preterm delivery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rodrigo Pauperio Soares de Camargo, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

MD. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

José Antonio Simões, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

MD, PhD. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

José Guilherme Cecatti, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

MD, PhD. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Valéria Moraes Nader Alves, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Sebastian Faro, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

MD, PhD. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas – Houston Health Science Center; The Woman’s Hospital of Texas, Houston, Texas, United States.

References

Martius J, Eschenbach DA. The role of bacterial vaginosis as a cause of amniotic fluid infection, chorioamnionitis and prema- turity - a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1990;247(1):1-13.

Bicalho-Mariotoni GG, Barros Filho AA. Nascer em Campinas: análise de dados do Sisnac, 1995. [Liveborn in Campinas: SISNAC, 1995]. Rev Paul Pediatr. 1997;15(1):24-30.

McGregor JA, French JI, Parker R, et al. Prevention of premature birth by screening and treatment for common genital tract infections: results of a prospective controlled evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(1):157-67.

Meis PJ, Goldenberg RL, Mercer BM, et al. The preterm prediction study: risk factors for indicated preterm births. Ma- ternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(3):562-7.

Goldenberg RL, Iams JD, Miodovnik M, et al. The preterm prediction study: risk factors in twin gestations. National Insti- tute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(4 Pt 1):1047-53.

Peaceman AM, Andrews WW, Thorp JM, et al. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of preterm birth in patients with symptoms: a multicenter trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(1):13-8.

Wennerholm UB, Holm B, Mattsby-Baltzer I, et al. Interleu- kin-1 alpha, interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 in cervico/vaginal secretion for screening of preterm birth in twin gestation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77(5):508-14.

Hillier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA, et al. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of low-birth- weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(26):1737-42.

Meis PJ, Goldenberg RL, Mercer B, et al. The preterm prediction study: significance of vaginal infections. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(4):1231-5.

Stray-Pedersen B. Is screening for genital infections in pregnancy necessary? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1997;164:116-20.

Brocklehurst P, Hannah M, McDonald H. Intervention for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. In: The Cochrane Library, update software. Oxford; 1999. Issue 2.

Simoes JA, Giraldo PC, Cecatti JG, Camargo RPS, Faundes A. Association between perinatal complications and bacterial vaginosis in Brazilian pregnant women. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1999;67(suppl 1):S43-4.

Carey JC, Klebanoff MA, Hauth JC, et al. Metronidazole to prevent preterm delivery in pregnant women with asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis. National Institute of Child Health and Hu- man Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(8):534-40.

1998 guidelines for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1998;47(RR-1):1-111.

Morales WJ, Schorr S, Albritton J. Effect of metronidazole in patients with preterm birth in preceding pregnancy and bacterial vaginosis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(2):345-9; discussion 348-9.

Hauth JC, Goldenberg RL, Andrews WW, DuBard MB, Cooper RL. Reduced incidence of preterm delivery with metronidazole and erythromycin in women with bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(26):1732-6.

McDonald HM, O’Loughlin JA, Vigneswaran R, et al. Impact of metronidazole therapy on preterm birth in women with bacterial vaginosis flora (Gardnerella vaginalis): a randomized, placebo controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(12):1391-7.

McClean H. Impact of metronidazole therapy on preterm birth in women with bacterial vaginosis flora. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(11):1239-40.

Simoes JA, Giraldo PC, Faúndes A. Prevalence of cervicovaginal infections during gestation and accuracy of clinical diagnosis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1998;6(3):129-33.

Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diag- nosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(2):297-301.

Capurro H, Konichezky S, Fonseca D, Caldeyro-Barcia R. A simplified method for diagnosis of gestational age in the newborn infant. J Pediatr. 1978;93(1):120-2.

Korn AP, Hessol NA, Padian NS, et al. Risk factors for plasma cell endometritis among women with cervical Neisseria gonor- rhoeae, cervical Chlamydia trachomatis, or bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(5):987-90.

Gravett MG, Nelson HP, DeRouen T, Critchlow C, Eschenbach DA, Holmes KK. Independent associations of bacterial vaginosis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection with adverse pregnancy outcome. JAMA. 1986;256(14):1899-1903.

Gratácos E, Figueras F, Barranco M, et al. Spontaneous recovery of bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy is not associated with an improved perinatal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998,77(1):37-40.

Hay PE, Lamont RF, Taylor-Robinson D, Morgan DJ, Ison C, Pearson J. Abnormal bacterial colonisation of the genital tract and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage. BMJ. 1994;308(6924):295-8.

Watts DH, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Eschenbach DA. Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for post-cesarean endometritis. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75(1):52-8.

Müller E, Berger K, Dennemark N, Oleen-Burkey M. Cost of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Decision analysis and cost evaluation of a clinical study in Germany. J Reprod Med. 1999;44(9):807-14.

Downloads

Published

2005-05-05

How to Cite

1.
Camargo RPS de, Simões JA, Cecatti JG, Alves VMN, Faro S. Impact of treatment for bacterial vaginosis on prematurity among Brazilian pregnant women: a retrospective cohort study. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2005 May 5 [cited 2025 Mar. 12];123(3):108-12. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/2325

Issue

Section

Original Article