Mid-arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratio in term newborns
Keywords:
Cephalometry, Anthropometry, Fetal growth restriction, NewbornAbstract
CONTEXT: Mid-arm circumference of the newborn is strongly associated with birth weight and is a very good indicator of low and insufficient birth weight. However, there are few Brazilian studies on the relationship between mid-arm and head circumferences and, thus, this does not form part of the routine evaluation for newborns. OBJECTIVES: To establish the mid-arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratio in a population of term newborns. TYPE OF STUDY: Cross-sectional study carried out between June 1997 and August 1999. SETTING: Hospital Maternidade Leonor Mendes de Barros, São Paulo. PARTICIPANTS: Term newborns (66 males and 65 females) of appropriate growth for gestational age, whose mothers were healthy, were included in the study. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Arm circumference, arm circumference/head circumference ratio, birth weight and gestational age were measured within 48 hours of birth. Data were considered significant when p < 0.01. RESULTS: The mean values for the mid-arm circumference were 10.76 cm (standard deviation, SD = 0.68) for females and 10.76 (SD = 0.81) for males. The mean value for the mid-arm/head circumference ratio was 0.31 (SD = 0.02) for both sexes. Mid-arm circumference values were significantly related to birth weight and gestational age, whereas mid-arm/head circumference ratio was related only to birth weight. CONCLUSIONS: Mid-arm circumference and midarm/head circumference ratio values were established for the studied population. It was possible to obtain curves for both mid-arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratio in relation to birth weight. However, for mid-arm circumference, it was only possible to obtain curves in relation to gestational age. The use of the regression curves did not seem powerful enough to predict the mid-arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratio in this population of term newborns. There were no gender differences for either of the measurements studied.
Downloads
References
Georgieff MK, Sasanow SR, Chockalingam UM, Pereira GR. A comparison of the mid-arm circumference/head circumfer- ence ratio and ponderal index for the evaluation of newborn infants after abnormal intrauterine growth. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1988;77(2):214-9.
Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Boyd E. Intrauterine growth in length and head circumference as estimated from live births at gestational ages from 26 to 42 weeks. Pediatrics. 1966;37(3):403-8.
Battaglia FC, Lubchenco LO. A practical classification of new- born infants by weight gestational age. J Pediatr. 1967; 71(2):159-63.
Patterson RM, Pouliot MR. Neonatal morphometrics and peri- natal outcome: who is growth retarded? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157(3):691-3.
Patterson RM, Prihoda TJ, Gibbs CE, Wood RC. Analysis of birth weight percentile as a predictor of perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68(4):459-63.
Sharma JN, Sharma BS, Gupta ML, Saxena S, Sharma U. Mid- arm circumference at birth as a predictor of low birth weight babies and early neonatal mortality. Indian Pediatr. 1986;23(11):915-9.
Fay RA, Dey PL, Saadie CM, Buhl JA, Gebski VJ. Ponderal index: a better definition of the “at risk” group with intrauter- ine growth problems than birth-weight for gestational age in term infants. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;31(1):17-9.
Leichtig A, Ibarra A, Gupta M, Klein R. Indicadores de riesgo de morir durante el primer año de vida en areas rurales de Gua- temala. [Indicators of the risk of death during the first year of life in rural areas of Guatemala]. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 1980;30(4):677-81.
De Vaquera MV, Townsend JW, Arroyo JJ, Lechtig A. The rela- tionship between arm circumference at birth and early mortal- ity. J Trop Pediatr. 1983;29(3):167-74.
Wales JK, Carney S, Gibson AT. The measurement of neonates. Horm Res. 1997;48(Suppl 1):2-10.
Kanawati AA, McLaren DS. Assessment of marginal malnutrition. Nature. 1970;228(271):573-5.
Sasanow SR, Georgieff MK, Pereira GR. Mid-arm circumfer- ence and mid-arm/head circumference ratios: standard curves for anthropometric assessment of neonatal nutritional status. J Pediatr. 1986;109(2):311-5.
Dias MLCM. Perímetros do braço da coxa e da panturrilha do recém nascido como indicadores do baixo peso e do peso insatisfatório ao nascer [thesis]. Recife: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; 1986.
Alves JG, Lima GM, Acevedo GN, Cabral VB, Moggi RS, Nunes R. Avaliação do perímetro braquial em recém-nascidos como método de verificação de baixo peso ao nascer. [Determination of the arm circumference in newborn infants as a method of verifying low birth weight]. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1991;111(3):215-7.
Capurro H, Konichezky S, Fonseca D, Caldeyro-Barcia R. A simplified method for diagnosis of gestational age in the new- born infant. J Pediatr. 1978;93(1):120-2.
World Health Organization (WHO). Cid 10. Organização Mundial da Saúde trad Centro Colaborador da OMS para Classificação de doenças em português. São Paulo: EDUSP; 1994.
Roselli CAM, Segre CAM. Avaliação da idade gestacional. Classificação do RN. In: Segre CAM, editor. Perinatologia: fundamentos e prática. São Paulo: Sarvier; 2002. p.374-84.
World Health Organization (WHO). Physical Status. The use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Ex- pert Committee. Technical Report Series 854. Available from URL: www.who.int/bookorders/anglais/detart1.jsp?sesslan=1& codlan=1&codcol=10&codcch=854. Accessed in 2004 (Jan 24).
Kanawati AA, McLaren DS, Abu-Jawdeh I. Failure to thrive in Lebanon. I. Experience with some simple somatic measurements. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1971;60(3):309-16.
Sharma JN, Saxena S, Sharma U. Standard curves for mid arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratio in newborns. Indian J Pediatr. 1990;57(3):389-93.
Jiménez Garcia R, Gallestey J, Garcia JRM, Rubi MCM, Rivero MA. Perfiles somatometricos de las circunferencias y los pliegues de grasa en el recién nacido. Rev Latinoam Perinatol. 1992;12:9-14.
Ziegler EE, O’Donnell AM, Nelson SE, Fomon SJ. Body com- position of the reference fetus. Growth. 1976;40(4):329-41.
Pereira-da-Silva L, Veiga Gomes J, Clington A, Videira-Amaral JM, Bustamante SA. Upper arm measurements of healthy neonates comparing ultrasonography and anthropometric meth- ods. Early Hum Dev. 1999;54(2):117-28.
Sánchez D, Ignacio CSMF, Tapia IJL, Juez GG. Relación entre perímetro braquial y algunos indicadores de crecimiento intrauterino. [Mid-arm circumference and intrauterine growth]. Rev Chil Pediatr. 1988;59(5):295-8.
Yau KI, Chang MH. Weight to length ratio - a good parameter for determining nutritional status in preterm and full-term newborns. Acta Paediatr. 1993;82(5):427-9.
Golebiowska M, Ligenza I, Kobierska I, et al. Zastosowanie wskaznika ramienno-glowowego dla oceny wieku ciazowego i stanu odzywienia noworodka. [Use of mid-arm and head cir- cumference to estimate gestational age and nutritional status of the newborns]. Ginekol Pol. 1992; 63(5): 221-6.
Balcazar H, Keefer L, Chard T. Use of anthropometric indica- tors and maternal risk factors to evaluate intrauterine growth retardation in infants weighing more than 2500 grams at birth. Early Hum Dev. 1994;36(3):147-55.
Ramos JLA. Avaliação do crescimento intra-uterino por medidas antropométricas do recém-nascido. [Thesis]. São Paulo (SP): Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo; 1983.
Meadows NJ, Till J, Leaf A, Hughes E, Jani B, Larcher V. Screen- ing for intrauterine growth retardation using ratio of mid-arm circumference to occipitofrontal circumference. Br Med J. 1986;292(6527):1039-40.
Gueri M, Justum P, Knight P, Hinds V. The arm circumference at birth and its relations to other anthropometric parameters. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 1977;27(3):403-10.
