How reproducible is self-reported information on exposure to smoking, drinking, and dietary patterns? Evidence among Brazilian adults in the Pró-Saúde Study

Authors

  • Dóra Chor Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Eduardo Faerstein Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Márcia Guimarães Mello Alves Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Márcia Guimarães Mello Alves Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Claudia de Souza Lopes Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Keywords:

Brazil, Smoking, Alcohol, Drinking, Diet

Abstract

CONTEXT: Epidemiological studies of the validity and reliability of self-reported information on important risk factors for non-communicable chronic diseases are scarce in Brazil. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the test-retest reliability of information – overall and stratified by gender, age and education – on active and passive smoking, alcohol intake and aspects of dietary habits. TYPE OF STUDY: Test-retest reliability. SETTING: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: 192 University employees. PROCEDURES: Self-administered questionnaires were completed on two occasions, two weeks apart. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Kappa Statistics; Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. RESULTS: Information on smoking status and pack-years smoked had almost perfect levels of agreement, respectively, kappa = 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92-1.00), and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93 (CI 95%, 0.89-0.96). Characteristics of alcohol intake yielded substantial levels of agreement (kappa ranging from 0.62 to 0.69). The reproducibility of the information on dietary habits varied from 0.67 to 0.79 (kappa). No clear-cut patterns could be identified comparing information by age or gender. There was a slight tendency towards greater reliability among people with higher levels of education. CONCLUSION: The reproducibility of information on smoking, drinking, and dietary patterns ranged from substantial to excellent, as investigated in the Pró-Saúde Study, a longitudinal investigation recently launched in Rio de Janeiro.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dóra Chor, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

MD, PhD. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Eduardo Faerstein, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

MD, PhD. Institute of Social Medicine, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Márcia Guimarães Mello Alves, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

MD, MPh. Doctoral student, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Márcia Guimarães Mello Alves, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

MD, MPh. Doctoral student, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Claudia de Souza Lopes, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

MD, PhD. Institute of Social Medicine, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

References

Sichieri R. Epidemiologia da obesidade. Rio de Janeiro: Eduerj; 1998.p.25-35.

Brownson RC, Eyler AA, King AC, Shyu Y-L, Brown DR, Homan SM. Reliability of information on physical activity and other chronic disease risk factors among US women aged 40 years or older. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149(4):379-91.

Stein AD, Courval JM, Lederman RI, Shea S. Reproducibility of responses to telephone interviews: demographic predictors of discordance in risk factor status. Am J Epidemiol 1995;141(11):1097-105.

Colditz GA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, et al. The influence of age, relative weight, smoking, and alcohol intake on the reproducibility of a dietary questionnaire. Int J Epidem iol 1987;16(3):392-8.

Castellsagué X, Muñoz N, De Stefani E, et al. Independent and joint effects of tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking on the risk of esophageal cancer in men and women. Int J Cancer 1999;82(5):657-64.

Aday LA. Designing and conducting health surveys: a compre- hensive guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub; 1991.p.165

Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a prac- tical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity; 1989.p.55.

Szklo M, Javier Nieto F. Epidemiology: beyond the basics. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers Inc; 2000.p.330.

Fleiss JL, Cohen J. Equivalence of weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas 1973;33:613-9.

Bartko JJ, Carpenter WT. On the methods and theory of reli- ability. J Nerv Ment Dis 1976;163(5):307-17

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agree- ment between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307-10.

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159-74.

Bowlin SJ, Morrill BD, Nafziger AN, Lewis C, Pearson TA. Reliability and changes in validity of self-reported cardiovascu- lar disease risk factor using dual response: the behavioral risk factor survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49(5):511-7.

Brownson RC, Jackson-Thompson J, Wilkerson JC, Kiani F. Reliability of information on chronic disease risk factors col- lected in the Missouri Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Sys- tem. Epidemiology 1994;5(5):545-9.

Stein AD, Lederman RI, Shea S. Reproducibility of the wom- en’s module of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol 1996;6(1):47-52.

The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility. Addic- tion 2002;97(9):1183-94.

Downloads

Published

2003-03-03

How to Cite

1.
Chor D, Faerstein E, Alves MGM, Alves MGM, Lopes C de S. How reproducible is self-reported information on exposure to smoking, drinking, and dietary patterns? Evidence among Brazilian adults in the Pró-Saúde Study. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2003 Mar. 3 [cited 2025 Mar. 9];121(2):63-6. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/2586

Issue

Section

Original Article