Infant mortality due to perinatal causes in Brazil

trends, regional patterns and possible interventions

Authors

  • Cesar Gomes Victora Universidade Federal de Pelotas and PAHO/WHO Latin American Center for Perinatology
  • Fernando Celso Barros Universidade Federal de Pelotas and PAHO/WHO Latin American Center for Perinatology

Keywords:

Infant mortality, Perinatal causes, Ante-natal care, Delivery care, Preventive care

Abstract

CONTEXT: Brazilian infant and child mortality levels are not compatible with the country’s economic potential. In this paper, we provide a description of levels and trends in infant mortality due to perinatal causes and malformations and assess the likely impact of changing intermediate-level determinants, many of which are amenable to direct interventions through the health or related sectors. TYPE OF STUDY: Review paper. METHODS: Two main sources of mortality data were used: indirect mortality estimates based on censuses and surveys, and rates based on registered deaths. The latter were corrected for under-registration. Combination of the two sources of data allowed the estimation of cause-specific mortality rates. Data on current coverage of preventive and curative interventions were mostly obtained from the 1996 Demographic and Health Survey. Other national house-hold surveys and Ministry of Health Statistics were also used. A thorough review of the Brazilian literature on levels, trends and determinants of infant mortality led to the identification of a large number of papers and books. These provided the background for the analyses of risk factors and potential interventions. RESULTS: The indirect infant mortality rate estimate for 1995-97 is of 37.5 deaths per thousand live births, about six times higher than in the lowest mortality countries in the world. Perinatal causes account for 57% of all infant deaths, and congenital malformations are responsible for 11.2% of these deaths. Mortality levels are highest in the Northeast and North, and lowest in the South and Southeast; the Center-West falls in between. Since surveys of the North region do not cover rural areas, mortality for this region may be underestimated. CONCLUSIONS: A first priority for the further reduction in infant mortality in Brazil is to improve equality among regions, since the North and Northeast, and particularly rural areas, still show very high death rates. Further reductions in infant mortality will largely depend on decreasing deaths due to perinatal causes. Improvements in the coverage and particularly in the quality of antenatal and delivery care are urgently needed. Another intervention with a potential important impact on infant mortality is the promotion of family planning. Improving birth weight might lead to an 8% reduction in infant mortality but the efficacy of available interventions is low.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cesar Gomes Victora, Universidade Federal de Pelotas and PAHO/WHO Latin American Center for Perinatology

MD, PhD. Professor of the PostGraduate Course in Epidemiology, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Fernando Celso Barros, Universidade Federal de Pelotas and PAHO/WHO Latin American Center for Perinatology

MD, PhD. PAHO/WHO Consultant for the Latin American Center for Perinatology, Montevideo, Uruguay

References

UNICEF. State of the world’s children 2000. New York: UNICEF; 1999.

Mosley WH, Chen LC. An analytical framework for the study of child survival in developing countries. In: Mosley WH, Chen LC. Child survival: strategies for research. Pop Devel Rev 1984:10(suppl):25-48.

UNICEF. Strategy for improved nutrition of children and women in developing countries. A UNICEF Policy Review. New York: UNICEF; 1990.

Trussel J. A re-estimation of the multiplying factors of the Brass technique for determining childhood survivorship rates. Pop Stud 1975;19:3.

Simões CC. Estimativas da mortalidade infantil por microrregiões e municípios. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde (SPS); 1999.

BEMFAM/DHS. Pesquisa Nacional sobre Demografia e Saúde 1996. Rio: BEMFAM/DHS; 1997.

Ministerio da Saúde. Informações de Saúde. DATASUS (http:// www.datasus.gov.br)

BEMFAM/DHS. Pesquisa Nacional sobre Saúde Materno- Infantil e Planejamento Familiar, Brazil - 1986. Rio: BEMFAM/ DHS; 1987.

Pan American Health Organization. Health in the Americas 1998 Edition. Washington: PAHO; 1999 (vol. 1).

Ministério da Saúde/UNICEF. A mortalidade perinatal e neonatal no Brasil. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, UNICEF; 1998.

Tanaka ACA, Siqueira AA, Bafile PN. Situação de saúde ma- terna e perinatal no estado de São Paulo. Rev Saude Publica 1989;23:67-75.

Halpern R, Barros FC, Victora CG, Tomasi E. Atenção pré-natal em Pelotas, RS, 1993. Cad Saude Publica 1998;14:487-92.

Bailey P, Tsui AO, Janowitz B, Dominik R, Araújo L. A study of infant mortality and causes of death in a rural Northeast Brazilian community. J Biosoc Sci 1990;22:349-63.

Gray RH, Ferraz EM, Amorim MS, Melo LF. Levels and determi- nants of early neonatal mortality n Natal, Northeastern Brazil: results of a surveillance and case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 1991;20:467-73.

Menezes AMB, Barros FC, Victora CG, Tomasi E, Halpern R, Oliveira ALB. Fatores de risco para mortalidade perinatal em Pelotas, RS, 1993. Rev Saude Publica 1998;32:209-16.

Barros FC, Victora CG, Vaughan JP, Estanislau HJ. Perinatal mor- tality in Southern Brazil: a population-based study of 7,392 births. Bull World Health Organ 1987;65:95-104.

Rumel D, Costa Filho DC, Aiello S, Koyama SM, Rosenbaum W. Acurácia dos indicadores de risco do Programa de Defesa de Vidas dos Lactentes em região do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Rev Saude Publica 1992;26:6-11.

Barros FC, Vaughan JP, Victora CG, Huttly SRA. An epidemic of cesarean sections in Brazil? The influence of tubal ligations and socioeconomic status. Lancet 1991;338:167-9.

Barros FC, Vaughan JP, Victora CG. Why so many cesarean sec- tions? The need for a further policy change in Brazil. Health Policy Plan 1986;1:19-29.

World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2:436-7.

Belizán JM, Althabe F, Barros FC, Alexander S. Rates and impli- cations of cesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study. Brit Med J 1999; 319:1397-402.

Béhague DP, Victora CG, Barros FC. Consumer demand for cesarean section deliveries in Brazil: informed decision-making,patient choice or social inequality? (Submitted for publication).

Souza RKT, Gotlieb SLD. Probabilidade de morrer no primeiro ano de vida em área urbana da região sul, Brasil. Rev Saude Pub- lica 1993;27:445-54.

Horta BL, Barros FC, Halpern R, Victora CG. Baixo peso ao nascer em duas coortes de base populacional no sul do Brasil. Cad Saude Publica 1996;12 (Suppl. 1):27-31.

Victora CG, Grassi PR, Schmidt AM. Situação de saúde da criança gaúcha, 1980-92: tendências temporais e distribuição espacial. Rev Saude Publica 1994; 28:423-32.

Barros FC, Victora CG, Vaughan JP. Causas de mortes perinatais em Pelotas, RS. Utilização de uma classificação simplificada. Rev Saude Publica 1987;21:310-6.

Leite AJML, Marcopito LF, Diniz RL et al. Mortes perinatais no município de Fortaleza, Ceará: o quanto é possível evitar? Jornal Pediatria 1997;73:388-94.

Araujo G, Araujo L, Janowitz B, Wallace S, Potts M. Improving obstetric care in Northeast Brazil. Bull Pan Am Health Organ 1983;17:233-42.

Janowitz B, Wallace S, Araujo G, Araujo L. Referrals by tradi- tional birth attendants in Northeast Brazil. Am J Public Health 1985;75:745-8.

Barros FC, Huttly SRA, Victora CG et al. Comparison of the causes and consequences of prematurity and intrauterine growth retardation: a longitudinal study in Southern Brazil. Pediatrics 1992;90:238-44.

Kramer MS, Victora CG. Low birth weight and perinatal mortal- ity. In: Semba RS. Maternal and child health in developing coun- tries (in press).

Victora CG, Barros FC, Martines JC, Beria JU, Vaughan JP. As mães lembram o peso ao nascer de seus filhos? Rev Saude Publica 1985;19(3):195-200.

Souza ACT, Cufino E, Peterson KE, Gardner J, Amaral MIV, Ascherio A. Variations in infant mortality rates among munici- palities in the state of Ceará, Northeast Brazil: an ecological analysis. Int J Epidemiol 1999;28:267-75.

Barros FC, Victora CG, Vaughan JP, Teixeira AMB, Ashworth A. Infant mortality in Southern Brazil: a population-based study of causes of death. Arch Dis Child 1987;62:487-90.

Menezes AMB, Victora CG, Barros FC, Albernaz E, Menezes FS, Jannke HA, Alves C, Rocha C. Mortalidade infantil em duas coortes de base populacional no sul do Brasil: tendências e diferenciais. Cad Saude Publica 1996;12 (Suppl. 1):73-78.

Smaill F. Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteruria in pregnancy (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.

World Health Organization. Expert Committee on Nutrition. Physical status: uses and interpretation of anthropometry. Geneva: WHO; 1995. (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 854).

Ferraz EM, Gray RH, Cunha TM. Determinants of preterm de- livery and intrauterine growth retardation in northeast Brazil. Int J Epidemiol 1990;19:101-8.

Rondo PH, Abbott R, Rodrigues LC, Tomkins AM. The influence of maternal nutritional factors on intrauterine growth retar- dation in Brazil. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1997;11:152-66.

Monteiro CA, Benicio MH, Gouveia N da C. Secular growth trends in Brazil over three decades. Ann Hum Biol 1994;21:381-90.

Kramer MS, Haas J, Kelly A. Maternal anthropometry-based screening and pregnancy outcome: a decision analysis. Trop Med Intl Health 1998;3:447-53.

World Health Organization. Maternal anthropometry and preg- nancy outcomes: WHO Collaborative Study. Bull World Health Organ 1995;73(Suppl):1-98.

Kramer MS. The effects of energy and protein intake on preg- nancy outcome: an overview of the research evidence from con- trolled clinical trials. Am J Clin Nutr 1993;58:627-35.

Monteiro CA, Conde WL. A tendência secular da obesidade segundo estratos sociais: Nordeste e Sudeste do Brasil, 1975-1989- 1997. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab 1999;43:186-94.

Menezes AMB, Victora CG. Effects of Tobacco on Children and Adolescents: Brazil and other South American countries. Geneva: WHO Tobacco Free Initiative; 1999 (unpublished report).

Lumley J, Oliver S, Waters E. Interventions for promoting smok- ing cessation during pregnancy (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library. Oxford: Update Software, 1999 (Issue 4).

Curtis SL, Diamond I, McDonald JW. Birth interval and family effect on post-neonatal mortality in Brazil. Demography 1993:30:33-43.

Wegman ME. Infant mortality: some international comparisons. Pediatrics 1996 Dec;98(6 Pt 1):1020-7.

Santos TF, Moura FA. Os determinantes da mortalidade infantil no Nordeste: aplicação de modelos hierárquicos. X Congresso Nacional da Associação Brasileira de Estudos Populacionais, 1998. (www.abep.org.br/port/publi/anais).

Huttly S, Victora CG, Barros FC, Vaughan JP. Birth spacing and child health in urban Brazilian children. Pediatrics 1992;89:1049-54.

Oliveira LAP, Simões CCS. O novo padrão demográfico e as políticas públicas. Cadernos de Políticas Sociais no. 7. Brasília: UNICEF; 1997.

Mauldin WP, Ross JA. Prospects and programs for fertility reduction, 1990-2015. Studies in Family Planning. 1994;25:77-95.

Locksmith GJ, Duff P. Preventing neural tube defects: the impor- tance of periconceptional folic acid supplements. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:1027-34.

Oakley GP Jr, Adams MJ, Dickinson CM. More folic acid for everyone, now. J Nutr 1996;126:751S-755S.

Downloads

Published

2001-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Victora CG, Barros FC. Infant mortality due to perinatal causes in Brazil: trends, regional patterns and possible interventions. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2001 Jan. 1 [cited 2025 Mar. 12];119(1):33-42. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/2741

Issue

Section

Review Article