Is reiki or prayer effective in relieving pain during hospitalization for cesarean? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Keywords:
Spirituality, Delivery, obstetric, Complementary therapies, Risk factors, ReviewAbstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: This systematic review compared reiki and prayer with drug use for relieving pain during hospitalization for cesarean, given that the popularity of integrative medicine and spiritual healing has been incrasing. It had the aim of evaluating whether reiki or prayer is effective in relieving pain during cesarean section. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review with meta-analysis conducted at Botucatu Medical School, UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil.METHODS: The following databases were searched up to March 2016: MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and CENTRAL. Randomized controlled trials published in English or Portuguese were included in the review. Two reviewers independently screened eligible articles, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. A GRADE table was produced to evaluate the risk of bias. RESULTS: There was evidence with a high risk of bias showing a statistically significant decrease in painscore through use of reiki and prayer, in relation to the protocol group: mean difference = -1.6 8; 95% confidence interval: -1.92 to -1.43; P < 0.00001; I2 = 92%. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in heart rate or systolic or diastolic blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Evidence with a high risk of bias suggested that reiki and prayer meditation might be associated with pain reduction.
Downloads
References
Lee MS, Pittler MH, Ernst E. Effects of reiki in clinical practice: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62(6):947-54.
vanderVaart S, Gijsen VM, de Wildt SN, Koren G. A systematic review of the therapeutic effects of Reiki. J Altern Complement Med. 2009;15(11):1157-69.
Esmail N. Complementary and alternative medicine in Canada: trends in use and public attitudes, 1997-2006. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute; 2007. Available from: https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/ComplementaryAlternativeMedicine.pdf Accessed in 2016 (Dec 13).
Vitale A. An integrative review of Reiki touch therapy research. Holist Nurs Pract. 2007;21(4):167-79; quiz 180-1.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Reiki: in Depth. Available from: https://nccih.nih.gov/health/reiki/introduction.htm Accessed in 2016 (Dec 13).
Sitepu NF. Effect of zikir meditation on post operative pain among muslim patients undergoing abdominal surgery, Medan, Indonesia. Thailand: Prince of Songkla University; 2009. Available from: http://kb.psu.ac.th/psukb/bitstream/2010/5953/1/313829.pdf Accessed in 2016 (Dec 13).
Abdel-Khalek AM, Lester D. Religiosity, health, and psychopathology in two cultures: Kuwait and USA. Mental Health, Religion & Culture. 2007;10(5):537-50.
Syed IB. Spiritual Medicine in the History of Islamic Medicine. Intermational Society for the History of Islamic Medicine. 2003;2(1):45-9. Available from: http://www.ishim.net/ishimj/4/08.pdf Accessed in 2016 (Dec 13).
Vandervaart S, Berger H, Tam C, et al. The effect of distant reiki on pain in women after elective Caesarean section: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2011;1(1):e000021.
Midilli TS, Eser I. Effects of Reiki on Post-caesarean Delivery Pain, Anxiety, and Hemodynamic Parameters: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015;16(3):388-99.
Beiranvand S, Noparast M, Eslamizade N, Saeedikia S. The effects of religion and spirituality on postoperative pain, hemodynamic functioning and anxiety after cesarean section. Acta Med Iran. 2014;52(12):909-15.
Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from http://handbook.cochrane.org/ Accessed in 2016 (Dec 13).
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-6.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):407-15.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1283-93.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294-302.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1303-10.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1277-82.
Cochrane Community. RevMan 5.3 User Guide. Copenhagen: Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from: http://community.cochrane.org/sites/default/files/uploads/inline-files/RevMan_5.3_User_Guide.pdf Accessed in 2016 (Dec 13).
Rao A, Sibbritt D, Phillips JL, Hickman LD. Prayer or spiritual healing as adjuncts to conventional care: a cross sectional analysis of prevalence and characteristics of use among women. BMJ Open. 2015;5(6):e007345.
Bell RA, Suerken C, Quandt SA, et al. Prayer for health among U.S. adults: the 2002 National Health Interview Survey. Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine. 2005;10(3):175-88. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1533210105285445 Accessed in 2016 (Dec 13).
Benor DJ. Spiritual healing: scientific validation of a healing revolution. Southfield: Vision Publications, 2001.
