What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the clinical effectiveness of screening and diagnostic tests for cancer?

Authors

  • André Tito Pereira Bueno Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina — Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Vladimir Lisboa Capelasso Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina — Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Rafael Leite Pacheco Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina — Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Carolina de Oliveira Cruz Latorraca Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina — Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Tiago Biachi de Castria Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina — Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Daniela Vianna Pachito Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina — Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Rachel Riera Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina — Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Keywords:

Diagnosis, Early detection of cancer, Treatment outcome, Review [publication type], Evidence-based practice

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of screening tests for cancer is to detect it at an early stage in order to increase the chances of treatment. However, their unrestrained use may lead to unnecessary examinations, overdiagnosis and higher costs. It is thus necessary to evaluate their clinical effects in terms of benefits and harm. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of Cochrane systematic reviews, carried out in the Discipline of Evidence‑Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: Cochrane reviews on the clinical effectiveness of cancer screening procedures were included. Study titles and abstracts were independently assessed by two authors. Conflicts were resolved by another two authors. Findings were summarized and discussed. RESULTS: Seventeen reviews were selected: fifteen on screening for specific cancers (bladder, breast, colorectal, hepatic, lung, nasopharyngeal, esophageal, oral, prostate, testicular and uterine) and two others on cancer in general. The quality of evidence of the findings varied among the reviews. Only two reviews resulted in high-quality evidence: screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for high-risk individuals seems to reduce lung cancer mortality; and screening using flexible sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood tests seems to reduce colorectal cancer mortality. CONCLUSION: The evidence found through Cochrane reviews did not support most of the commonly used screening tests for cancer. It is recommended that patients should be informed of the possibilities of false positives and false negatives before they undergo the tests. Further studies to fully assess the effectiveness of cancer screening tests and adverse outcomes are required.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

André Tito Pereira Bueno, Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina — Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Undergraduate Medical Student, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

Vladimir Lisboa Capelasso, Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina — Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Undergraduate Medical Student, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

Rafael Leite Pacheco, Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina — Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Undergraduate Medical Student, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

Carolina de Oliveira Cruz Latorraca, Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina — Universidade Federal de São Paulo

MSc. Psychologist, Evidence-Based Health Program, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo (SP), Brazil; and Assistant Researcher, Cochrane Brazil, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

Tiago Biachi de Castria, Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina — Universidade Federal de São Paulo

MD, PhD. Clinical Oncologist, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de São Paulo (USP) and Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

Daniela Vianna Pachito, Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina — Universidade Federal de São Paulo

MD, MSc. Neurologist and Postgraduate Student, Evidence-Based Health Program, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo (SP), and Assistant Researcher, Cochrane Brazil, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

Rachel Riera, Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina — Universidade Federal de São Paulo

MD, MSc, PhD. Rheumatologist and Adjunct Professor, Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

References

Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359-86.

Stewart BW, Wild CP. World Cancer Report 2014. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer. World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: http://publications.iarc.fr/Non-Series-Publications/World-Cancer-Reports/World-Cancer-Report-2014 Accessed in 2017 (Jul 17).

Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). Benefits and risks of screening tests. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0072602/ Accessed in 2017 (Jul 17).

World Health Organization. Screening for various cancers. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: http://who.int/cancer/detection/variouscancer/en/ Accessed in 2017 (Jul 17).

Bulliard J-L, Chiolero A. Screening and overdiagnosis: public health implications. Public Health Reviews. 2015;36(1):8.

Thornton H, Pillarisetti RR. 'Breast awareness' and 'breast self-examination' are not the same. What do these terms mean? Why are they confused? What can we do? Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(15):2118-21.

Petticrew MP, Sowden AJ, Lister-Sharp D, Wright K. False-negative results in screening programmes: systematic review of impact and implications. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(5):1-120.

Peregrino AAF, Vianna CMM, Almeida CEV, et al. Análise de Custo-efetividade do rastreamento do câncer de mama com mamografia convencional, digital e ressonância [Analysis of Cost-effectiveness of screening for breast cancer with conventional mammography, digital and magnetic resonance imaging]. Ciên Saúde Coletiva. 2012;17(1):215-22.

Krogsbøll LT, Jørgensen KJ, Grønhøj Larsen C, Gøtzsche PC. General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD009009.

Robertson L, Yeoh SE, Stansby G, Agarwal R. Effect of testing for cancer on cancer- and venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related mortality and morbidity in patients with unprovoked VTE. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(3):CD010837.

Krogsbøll LT, Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC. Screening with urinary dipsticks for reducing morbidity and mortality. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD010007.

Moschetti I, Cinquini M, Lambertini M, Levaggi A, Liberati A. Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(5):CD001768.

Gartlehner G, Thaler K, Chapman A, et al. Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(4):CD009632.

Kösters JP, Gøtzsche PC. Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD003373.

Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen KJ. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(6):CD001877.

Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Irwig L, Towler B, Watson E. Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(1):CD001216.

Holme Ø, Bretthauer M, Fretheim A, Odgaard-Jensen J, Hoff G. Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(9):CD009259.

Aghoram R, Cai P, Dickinson JA. Alpha-foetoprotein and/or liver ultrasonography for screening of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(9):CD:002799.

Manser R, Lethaby A, Irving LB, et al. Screening for lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(6):CD001991.

Yang S, Wu S, Zhou J, Chen XY. Screening for nasopharyngeal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(11):CD008423.

Yang S, Wu S, Huang Y, et al. Screening for oesophageal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD007883.

Brocklehurst P, Kujan O, O'Malley LA, et al. Screening programmes for the early detection and prevention of oral cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(11):CD004150.

Ilic D, Neuberger MM, Djulbegovic M, Dahm P. Screening for prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(1):CD004720.

Ilic D, Misso ML. Screening for testicular cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(2):CD007853.

van der Heijden E, Lopes AD, Bryant A, Bekkers R, Galaal K. Follow-up strategies after treatment (large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) test. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD010757.

Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1490.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-03

How to Cite

1.
Bueno ATP, Capelasso VL, Pacheco RL, Latorraca C de OC, Castria TB de, Pachito DV, Riera R. What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the clinical effectiveness of screening and diagnostic tests for cancer?. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2017 Aug. 3 [cited 2025 Mar. 14];135(4):401-10. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/799

Issue

Section

Cochrane Highlights