Characteristics of fetuses evaluated due to suspected anencephaly

a population-based cohort study in southern Brazil

Authors

  • Emanuele Pelizzari Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV)
  • Carolina Melendez Valdez
  • Jamile dos Santos Picetti Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV)
  • André Campos da Cunha Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV)
  • Cristine Dietrich Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV)
  • Paulo Renato Krahl Fell Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV)
  • Luciano Vieira Targa Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV)
  • Paulo Ricardo Gazzola Zen Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA)
  • Rafael Fabiano Machado Rosa Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA)

Keywords:

Anencephaly, Neural tube, Amniotic band syndrome, Ultrasonics, Genetic counseling

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Anencephaly is considered to be the most common type of neural tube defect. Our aim was to assess the clinical and gestational features of a cohort of fetuses with suspected anencephaly. DESIGN AND SETTING: Population-based retrospective cohort study in a referral hospital in southern Brazil. METHODS: The sample consisted of fetuses referred due to suspected anencephaly, to the Fetal Medicine Service of Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas, between January 2005 and September 2013. Clini-cal, radiological, pathological and survival data were gathered. RESULTS: Our sample was composed of 29 fetuses. The diagnosis of suspected anencephaly was made on average at 21.3 weeks of gestation. Seven fetuses had malformations that affected other organs, and these included oral clefts (n = 4) and congenital heart defects (n = 2). In 16 cases, there was termination of pregnancy (n = 12) or intrauterine death (n = 4). Regarding those who were born alive (n = 13), all of them died in the first week of life. After postnatal evaluation, the diagnosis of anencephaly was confirmed in 22 cases (75.9%). Other conditions included amniotic band disruption complex (6.9%), microhydranen-cephaly (6.9%), merocrania (3.4%) and holoprosencephaly (3.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Different conditions involving the cranial vault may be confused with anencephaly, as seen in our sample. However, these conditions also seem to have a poor prognosis. It seems that folic acid supplementation is not being properly performed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Emanuele Pelizzari, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV)

MD. Physician, Residency Program in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Carolina Melendez Valdez

MD. Physician, Residency Program in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Jamile dos Santos Picetti, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV)

MD. Physician, Residency Program in Fetal Medicine, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

André Campos da Cunha, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV)

MD. Obstetrician, Fetal Medicine, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Cristine Dietrich, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV)

MD. Obstetrician, Fetal Medicine, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Paulo Renato Krahl Fell, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV)

MD. Obstetrician, Fetal Medicine, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Luciano Vieira Targa, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV)

MD. Pediatric Radiologist, Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Paulo Ricardo Gazzola Zen, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA)

PhD. Adjunct Professor of Clinical Genetics and of the Postgraduate Program on Pathology, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), and Clinical Geneticist, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA) and Complexo Hospitalar Santa Casa de Porto Alegre (CHSCPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Rafael Fabiano Machado Rosa, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA)

PhD. Clinical Geneticist, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Complexo Hospitalar Santa Casa de Porto Alegre (CHSCPA) and Hospital Materno Infantil Presidente Vargas (HMIPV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

References

Botto LD, Moore CA, Khoury MJ, Erickson JD. Neural-tube defects. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(20):1509-19.

Dolk H. EUROCAT: 25 years of European surveillance of congenital anomalies. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90(5):F355-8.

Gorgal R, Ramalho C, Brandão O, Matias A, Montenegro N. Revisiting acrania: same phenotype, different aetiologies. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;29(2):166-70.

Johnson SP, Sebire NJ, Snijders RJ, Tunkel S, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasound screening for anencephaly at 10-14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9(1):14-6.

Harrington BJ, Horger EO, Edwards JG. A counseling dilemma involving anencephaly, acrania and amniotic bands. Genet Couns. 1992;3(4):183-6.

Keeling JW, Kjaer I. Diagnostic distinction between anencephaly and amnion rupture sequence based on skeletal analysis. J Med Genet. 1994;31(11):823-9.

Calzolari F, Gambi B, Garani G, Tamisari L. Anencephaly: MRI findings and pathogenetic theories. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34(12):1012-6.

Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Transvaginal fetal neurosonography: standardization of the planes and sections by anatomic landmarks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;8(1):42-7.

Becker R, Mende B, Stiemer B, Entezami M. Sonographic markers of exencephaly at 9 + 3 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16(6):582-4.

Sepulveda W, Sebire NJ, Fung TY, Pipi E, Nicolaides KH. Crown-chin length in normal and anencephalic fetuses at 10 to 14 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(4):852-5.

Cafici D, Sepulveda W. First-trimester echogenic amniotic fluid in the acrania-anencephaly sequence. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22(10):1075-9; quiz 1080-1.

Downey DB, Fenster A, Williams JC. Clinical utility of three-dimensional US. Radiographics. 2000;20(2):559-71.

Ertl-Wagner B, Lienemann A, Strauss A, Reiser MF. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: indications, technique, anatomical considerations and a review of fetal abnormalities. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(8):1931-40.

Ceylaner S, Ceylaner G, Günyeli I, et al. Postmortem evaluation of 220 prenatally diagnosed fetuses with neural tube defects: detection of associated anomalies in a Turkish population. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26(2):147-53.

Källén B, Cocchi G, Knudsen LB, et al. International study of sex ratio and twinning of neural tube defects. Teratology. 1994;50(5):322-31.

Rosa RF, Trevisan P, Rosa RC, et al. Trisomy 18 and neural tube defects. Pediatr Neurol. 2013;49(3):203-4.

Jaquier M, Klein A, Boltshauser E. Spontaneous pregnancy outcome after prenatal diagnosis of anencephaly. BJOG. 2006;113(8):951-3.

Levy PA. Amniotic bands. Pediatr Rev. 1998;19(7):249.

Werler MM, Louik C, Mitchell AA. Epidemiologic analysis of maternal factors and amniotic band defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2003;67(1):68-72.

Liu Y, Zhou C, Wang H, Tang Z, Ding H. 3D ultrasound in assessment of growth and development of frontal lobes in children with perinatal brain injury. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009:483-6.

Hunter AG, Seaver LH, Stevenson RE. Limb-body wall defect. Is there a defensible hypothesis and can it explain all the associated anomalies? Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A(9):2045-59.

Corona-Rivera JR, Corona-Rivera E, Romero-Velarde E, et al. Report and review of the fetal brain disruption sequence. Eur J Pediatr. 2001;160(11):664-7.

Guven A, Gunduz A, Bozoglu TM, Yalcinkaya C, Tolun A. Novel NDE1 homozygous mutation resulting in microhydranencephaly and not microlyssencephaly. Neurogenetics. 2012;13(3):189-94.

Weissman A, Diukman R, Auslender R. Fetal acrania: five new cases and review of the literature. J Clin Ultrasound. 1997;25(9):511-4.

Kauvar EF, Muenke M. Holoprosencephaly: recommendations for diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010;22(6):687-95.

Rosa RF, Rosa RC, Zen PR, Graziadio C, Paskulin GA. Trisomy 18: review of the clinical, etiologic, prognostic, and ethical aspects. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2013;31(1):111-20.

Bianca S, Ingegnosi C, Auditore S, et al. Prenatal and postnatal findings of acrania. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;271(3):256-8.

Cook RJ, Erdman JN, Hevia M, Dickens BM. Prenatal management of anencephaly. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;102(3):304-8.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-03

How to Cite

1.
Pelizzari E, Valdez CM, Picetti J dos S, Cunha AC da, Dietrich C, Fell PRK, Targa LV, Zen PRG, Rosa RFM. Characteristics of fetuses evaluated due to suspected anencephaly: a population-based cohort study in southern Brazil. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2015 Mar. 3 [cited 2025 Oct. 15];133(2):101-8. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1045

Issue

Section

Original Article