Searching for randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews on exercise
a descriptive study
Keywords:
Motor activity, Health information management, Health communication, Research, Biomedical researchAbstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The current paradigm of science is to accumulate as much research data as possible, with less thought given to navigation or synthesis of the resulting mass, which hampers locating and using the research. The aim here was to describe the number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews (SRs) focusing on exercise, and their journal sources, that have been indexed in PubMed over time. DESIGN AND SETTING: Descriptive study conducted at Bond University, Australia. METHOD: To find RCTs, a search was conducted in PubMed Clinical Queries, using the category “Therapy” and the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) term “Exercise”. To find SRs, a search was conducted in PubMed Clinical Queries, using the category “Therapy”, the MeSH term “Exercise” and various methodological filters. RESULTS: Up until 2011, 9,354 RCTs about exercise were published in 1,250 journals and 1,262 SRs in 513 journals. Journals in the area of Sports Science published the greatest number of RCTs and journals cat-egorized as belonging to “Other health professions” area (for example nursing or psychology) published the greatest number of SRs. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was the principal source for SRs, with 9.8% of the total, while the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research and Medicine & Sci-ence in Sports & Exercise published 4.4% and 5.0% of the RCTs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid growth and resulting scatter of RCTs and SRs on exercise presents challenges for locating and using this research. Solutions for this issue need to be considered.
Downloads
References
Tolle K, Tansley S, Hey A. The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2011;99(8):1334-7. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5958175. Accessed in 2014 (Jun 11).
Tsay MY, Yang YH. Bibliometric analysis of the literature of randomized controlled trials. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005;93(4):450-8.
Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994;309(6954):597-9.
Pronovost P, Wachter R. Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(3):152-3.
Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed in 2014 (May 15).
Silva V, Grande AJ, Martimbianco AL, Riera R, Carvalho AP. Overview of systematic reviews - a new type of study: part I: why and for whom? Sao Paulo Med J. 2012;130(6):398-404.
Baker PR, Francis DP, Soares J, Weightman AL, Foster C. Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(4):CD008366.
Hallal PC, Bauman AE, Heath GW, et al. Physical activity: more of the same is not enough. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):190-91.
Heath GW, Parra DC, Sarmiento OL, et al. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):272-81.
Seghers J, Van Hoecke AS, Schotte A, Opdenacker J, Boen F. The added value of a brief self-efficacy coaching on the effectiveness of a 12-week physical activity program. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11(1):18-29.
Kohl HW 3rd, Craig CL, Lambert EV, et al. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):294-305.
Hoffmann T, Erueti C, Thorning S, Glasziou P. The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties. BMJ. 2012;344:e3223.
Komaroff E, DeLisa JA. Best research evidence for physical medicine and rehabilitation. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32(1):3-5.
Mamdani M, Sykora K, Li P, et al. Reader’s guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding. BMJ. 2005;330(7497):960-2.
Normand SL, Sykora K, Li P, et al. Readers guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 3. Analytical strategies to reduce confounding. BMJ. 2005;330(7498):1021-3.
Rochon PA, Gurwitz JH, Sykora K, et al. Reader’s guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 1. Role and design. BMJ. 2005;330(7496):895-7.
Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. 2010;7(9):e1000326.
Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126-31.
Glasziou PP, Del Mar C, Salisbury J. Evidence-based practice workbook. London: Blackwood Publishing; 2007.
Hoffmann T, Bennett S, Del Mar C. Evidence-based practice across the health professions. Sydney: Elsevier Australia; 2013.
Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1575-81.
Bird L, Arthur A, Cox K. “Did the trial kill the intervention?” experiences from the development, implementation and evaluation of a complex intervention. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:24.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med. 2010;7(3):e1000251.
