Prevalence of uterine synechia after abortion evacuation curettage
Keywords:
Hysteroscopy, Intrauterine diagnosis, Missed abortion, Incomplete abortion, InfertilityAbstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is a possible complication of uterine curettage following abortion. Because IUA is an important cause of infertility, some investigators have been advocating its inclusion in the routine investigational workup after every abortion curettage procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the uterine cavity of patients subjected to abortion curettage, in order to ascertain the prevalence of IUA and its association with social and clinical factors. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a cross-sectional study at the Human Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp). METHODS: A total of 109 women were enrolled. The investigators searched the records of Unicamp’s hospital for patients who had been subjected to uterine curettage following abortion. The hysteroscopy was performed 3 to 12 months after the curettage. The correlations between patients’ characteristics and the prevalence of IUA were assessed by means of chi-squared and Fisher’s exact test calculations. RESULTS: The prevalence of IUA was 37.6%. The number of previous abortions and curettage procedures did not correlate with the presence of IUA. Most of the women (56.1%) presented IUA grade I. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, 37.6% of the women subjected to curettage following abortion had IUA, which was mostly mucous and grade I. None of the demographic and clinic characteristics evaluated were found to be associated with IUA. From this study, there is no fi rm evidence to justify carrying out routine diagnostic hysteroscopy following abortion evacuation.
Downloads
References
Ballagh SA, Harris HA, Demasio K. Is curettage needed for uncomplicated incomplete spontaneous abortion? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(5):1279-82.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Datasus. Informações de Saúde. Procedimentos hospitalares do SUS – por local de residência
– Brasil. AIH pagas segundo Região. Procedimento: 35014016 Curetagem pós aborto. Período: Dez/2005. Available from: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sih/cnv/pruf.def. Accessed in 2007 (Sep 12).
Al-Inany H. Intrauterine adhesions. An update. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(11):986-93.
Westendorp IC, Ankum WM, Mol BW, Vonk J. Prevalence of Asherman’s syndrome after secondary removal of placental remnants or a repeat curettage for incomplete abortion. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(12):3347-50.
Römer T. Post-abortion hysteroscopy--a method for early diag- nosis of congenital and acquired intrauterine causes of abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994;57(3):171-3.
Friedler S, Margalioth EJ, Kafka I, Yaffe H. Incidence of post- abortion intra-uterine adhesions evaluated by hysteroscopy--a prospective study. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(3):442-4.
Golan A, Schneider D, Avrech O, Raziel A, Bukovsky I, Caspi E. Hysteroscopic findings after missed abortion. Fertil Steril. 1992;58(3):508-10.
Lurie S, Appelman Z, Katz Z. Curettage after midtrimester termination of pregnancy. Is it necessary? J Reprod Med. 1991;36(11):786-8.
Adoni A, Palti Z, Milwidsky A, Dolberg M. The incidence of intrauterine adhesions following spontaneous abortion. Int J Fertil. 1982;27(2):117-8.
Schenker JG, Margalioth EJ. Intrauterine adhesions: an updated appraisal. Fertil Steril. 1982;37(5):593-610.
Valle RF. Lysis of intrauterine adhesions (Asherman’s Syndrome). In: Sutton C, Diamond M. Endoscopic surgery for gynaecologists. London: WB Saunders Company Ltd.; 1993. p. 338-44.
Roge P, D’Ercole C, Cravello L, Boubli L, Blanc B. Hysteroscopic management of uterine synechiae: a series of 102 observations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;65(2):189-93.
Wamsteker K, Blok S. Diagnostic hysteroscopy: technique and docu- mentation. In: Sutton C, Diamond M, editors. Endoscopic surgery for gynaecologists. London: WB Saunders; 1993. p. 262-76.
Malik E, Berg C, Sterzik K, Stoz F, Rossmanith WG. Reproductive outcome of 32 patients with primary or secondary infertility and uterine pathology. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2000;264(1):24-6.
Valle RF, Sciarra JJ. Intrauterine adhesions: hysteroscopic diagnosis, classification, treatment, and reproductive outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158(6 Pt 1):1459-70.
