Continuing medical education in Brazil

what about obstetricians and gynecologists?

Authors

  • Nelson Sass Cochrane Center of Brazil, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – Escola Paulista de Medicina
  • Maria Regina Torloni Cochrane Center of Brazil, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – Escola Paulista de Medicina
  • Bernardo Garcia de Oliveira Soares Cochrane Center of Brazil, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – Escola Paulista de Medicina
  • Álvaro Nagib Atallah Cochrane Center of Brazil, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – Escola Paulista de Medicina

Keywords:

Continuing medical education, Obstetrics, Gynecology, Evidence-based medicine, Medical education

Abstract

CONTEXT: In Brazil, obstetricians and gynecologists are not required to submit to periodical evaluations to ascertain their professional competence in dealing with new concepts and therapies. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of a group of obstetricians and gynecologists on a written evidence-based obstetrics test and determine their opinions and use of systematic reviews. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Brazilian Obstetrics and Gynecology Congress 2001. METHODS: 230 doctors agreed to participate in the study during a national obstetrics and gynecology congress. Participants took an individual anonymous written multiple-choice test with seven questions on clinical obstetrics, one question on the interpretation of a meta-analysis graph and two questions on their opinions and actual use of systematic reviews. Scores were analyzed and compared after grouping the participants according to year of graduation, residence training, doctoral program and faculty status. RESULTS: The general average score was 49.2 ± 17.4. The scores tended to decline as the years since graduation advanced. Doctors who graduated in the last five years had higher scores than those who graduated over 25 years ago (52.2 versus 42.9). The performance did not vary according to medi- cal residence, postgraduate program or teaching status. While 98.2% considered systematic reviews relevant, only 54.9% said that they routinely used this source of information. DISCUSSION: The participants’ average score was low, even though they were highly qualified and trained. Despite the limitations of the study, the results are worrisome. If motivated physicians participating in a national congress obtained such low scores, we can speculate that the results might be even worse among other doctors that do not attend these events. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that Brazilian obstetricians and gynecologists could benefit from continuing medical education and raise questions about the recycling methods currently available.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nelson Sass, Cochrane Center of Brazil, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – Escola Paulista de Medicina

MD, PhD. Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil.

Maria Regina Torloni, Cochrane Center of Brazil, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – Escola Paulista de Medicina

MD, PhD. Universidade Federal de São Paulo — Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil.

Bernardo Garcia de Oliveira Soares, Cochrane Center of Brazil, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – Escola Paulista de Medicina

MD, PhD. Cochrane Center of Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil.

Álvaro Nagib Atallah, Cochrane Center of Brazil, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – Escola Paulista de Medicina

MD, PhD. Cochrane Center of Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil.

References

Davis D. Does CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1998;28(1):21-39.

Richards T. Continuing medical education. BMJ. 1998;316(7127):246.

Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (INEP). O que é o Exame Nacional de Cursos? Available from URL: http://www.inep.gov.br/superior/provao/default.asp. Accessed in 2004 (Nov 23).

Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1992;268(9):1111-7.

Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continu- ing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274(9):700-5.

Cantillon P, Jones R. Does continuing medical education in gen- eral practice make a difference? BMJ. 1999;318(7193):1276-9.

Allery LA, Owen PA, Robling MR. Why general practitioners and consultants change their clinical practice: a critical incident study. BMJ. 1997;314(7084):870-4.

Atallah AN, Hofmeyr GJ, Duley L. Calcium supplementation during pregnancy for preventing hypertensive disorders and related problems (Cochrane Review). Available from URL: http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane/revabstr/ab001059.htm. Accessed in 2004 (Nov 23).

Bricker L, Neilson JP. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks gestation) (Cochrane Review). Available from URL: http://www.mediscope.ch/cochrane-abstracts/ab001451.htm. Accessed in 2004 (Nov 23).

Crowley P. Prophylactic corticosteroids for preterm birth (Cochrane Review). Available from URL: http://www.update-software.com/Abstracts/ab000065.htm. Accessed in 2004 (Nov 23).

Duley L, Gulmezoglu AM. Magnesium sulphate versus lytic cocktail for eclampsia (Cochrane Review). Available from URL: http://www.update-software.com/Abstracts/ab002960.htm. Accessed in 2004 (Nov 23).

Duley L, Henderson-Smart D. Magnesium sulphate versus phenytoin for eclampsia (Cochrane Review). Available from URL: http://www.update-software.com/Abstracts/ab000128.htm. Accessed in 2004 (Nov 23).

Duley L, Henderson-Smart D. Magnesium sulphate versus diazepam for eclampsia (Cochrane Review). Available from URL: http://www.update-software.com/Abstracts/ab000127.htm. Accessed in 2004 (Nov 23).

Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery (Cochrane Review). Available from URL: http://www.update-software.com/Abstracts/ab000166.htm. Accessed in 2004 (Nov 23).

Knight M, Duley L, Henderson-Smart DJ, King JF. Anti- platelet agents for preventing and treating pre-eclampsia (Cochrane Review). Available from URL: http://www.update-software.com/Abstracts/ab000492.htm. Accessed in 2004 (Nov 23).

Mulrow CD, Chiquette E, Ferrer RL, et al. Management of chronic hypertension during pregnancy. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment no. 14 (Prepared by the San Antonio Evidence-based Practice Center – University of Texas Health Science Center). AHRQ no. 00-E011. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. August 2000. Available from URL: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/preg-sum.htm. Accessed in 2004 (Nov 23).

Neilson JP. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001. Oxford: Update Software. Available from URL: http://www.update-software.com/Abstracts/ab000182.htm. Accessed in 2004 (Nov 23).

Downloads

Published

2005-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Sass N, Torloni MR, Soares BG de O, Atallah Álvaro N. Continuing medical education in Brazil: what about obstetricians and gynecologists?. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2005 Jan. 1 [cited 2026 Apr. 18];123(1):5-10. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/2300

Issue

Section

Original Article