Fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast lesions

a comparison between two devices for obtaining cytological samples

Authors

  • Ruffo Freitas Júnior Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás and Breast Unit of Hospital Araújo Jorge, Goiás Anticancer Association
  • Marise Amaral Rebouças Moreira Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás and Breast Unit of Hospital Araújo Jorge, Goiás Anticancer Association
  • Gustavo Antônio de Souza Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás and Breast Unit of Hospital Araújo Jorge, Goiás Anticancer Association
  • Ellen Hardy Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás and Breast Unit of Hospital Araújo Jorge, Goiás Anticancer Association
  • Regis Resende Paulinelli Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás and Breast Unit of Hospital Araújo Jorge, Goiás Anticancer Association

Keywords:

Breast neoplasms, Diagnosis, Cytology, Techniques, Biopsy

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Fine-needle aspira- tion biopsy has been accepted worldwide for breast lesions. However, some questions remain, including the appropriateness of the puncture method. The objective of this work was to compare aspirates obtained by the auto-vacuum device and by the syringe pistol holder. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized trial for validation of diagnostic method, at Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás and Hospital Araújo Jorge, Goiânia. METHODS: 351 patients presenting breast lumps underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy, either with the auto-vacuum device or the syringe pistol holder. A single cytopathologist analyzed all of the cytology slides. The rates of insufficient mate- rial, cellularity, cell distortion and background hemorrhage were evaluated. RESULTS: The percentages of insufficient mate- rial were 16% and 22% (p = 0.18), for the auto-vacuum and pistol aspirates, respectively. Good cellularity was seen in 34% of auto- vacuum and 29% of pistol samples (p = 0.4). Cell distortion was seen in 31 and 26 cases, respectively (p = 0.7). Background hemor- rhage occurred in 63 (35%) and 54 cases (31%) (p = 0.2), for auto-vacuum and pistol. The sensitivity was 88% and 86%; specificity 99% and 100%, positive predictive value 96% and 100%, negative predictive value 96% and 95% and total accuracy 76% and 75% for the auto-vacuum and pistol, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results obtained from the two fine-needle aspiration biopsy methods were equivalent. Therefore, the auto-vacuum device is a good option for obtaining aspirates for cytology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ruffo Freitas Júnior, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás and Breast Unit of Hospital Araújo Jorge, Goiás Anticancer Association

MD, PhD. Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Goiás; and Breast Unit of Hospital Araújo Jorge, Associação Anticâncer de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.

Marise Amaral Rebouças Moreira, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás and Breast Unit of Hospital Araújo Jorge, Goiás Anticancer Association

MD, PhD. Pathology Department, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.

Gustavo Antônio de Souza, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás and Breast Unit of Hospital Araújo Jorge, Goiás Anticancer Association

MD, PhD. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Ellen Hardy, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás and Breast Unit of Hospital Araújo Jorge, Goiás Anticancer Association

BA, MA, PhD. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Regis Resende Paulinelli, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás and Breast Unit of Hospital Araújo Jorge, Goiás Anticancer Association

MD. Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.

References

Catania S, Ciatto S. Breast cytology: instruments and technique. In: Ciatto S, editor. Breast cytology in clinical practice. London: Martin Dunitz; 1992. p. 11-60.

De Freitas R Jr, Hamed H, Fentiman I. Fine needle aspira- tion cytology of palpable breast lesions. Br J Clin Pract. 1992;46(3):187-90.

Franzen S, Zajicek J. Aspiration biopsy in diagnosis of palpable lesions of the breast. Critical review of 3479 consecutive biopsies. Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol. 1968;7(4):241-62.

Souza JA, Freitas Jr. R, Moreira MAR, Philocreon GR. Acurácia da sensação tátil da PAAF no diagnóstico de lesões mamárias. Rev Bras Mastologia. 1995;5(3):7-10.

Freitas Júnior R, Hamed H, Millis RR, Tomaz NMA, Fentiman IS. Punção aspirativa por agulha fina de lesões mamárias usando dispositivo de auto-vácuo. [Fine needle aspiration of breast lesions using auto-vacuum dispositive]. Rev Bras Mastologia. 1996;6(3):126-8.

de Freitas Júnior R, Giraldo PC, Rettori O, Vieira-Matos AN, Tambascia JK. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of solid tumours by auto-vacuum system: a study in rats. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1992;18(6):605-7.

Boccato P. How to treat the aspirated material. In: Ciatto S, editor. Breast cytology in clinical practice. London: Martin Dunitz; 1992. p. 61-4.

UICC. International Union Against Cancer. TNM classification of malignant tumors. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1987.

The World Health Organization Histological Typing of Breast Tumors - Second Edition. The World Organization. Am J Clin Pathol. 1982;78(6):806-16.

Gelabert HA, Hsiu JG, Mullen JT, Jaffe AH, D’Amato NA. Prospective evaluation of the role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and management of patients with palpable solid breast lesions. Am Surg. 1990;56(4):263-7.

Rouquayrol MZ. Epidemiologia e saúde. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi - Editora Científica; 1988.

Roberts JC, Rainsbury RM. ‘Tactile sensation’: a new clinical sign during fine needle aspiration of breast lumps. Ann R Coll Surg Eng. 1994;76(2):136-8.

Henderson MA, McCready DR. A simple technique for fine needle aspiration cytology. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;179(4):471-3.

Sasaki J, Izu K. Automatic fine needle aspiration pistol specially designed for small tumors. Acta Cytol. 1998;42(3):829-30.

Tao LC, Smith JW. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy using a newly-developed pencil-grip syringe holder. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999;20(2):99-104.

Patel JJ, Gartell PC, Smallwood JA, et al. Fine needle aspira- tion cytology of breast masses: an evaluation of its accu- racy and reasons for diagnostic failure. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987;69(4):156-9.

Abele J, Stanley MW, Rollins SD, Miller TR. What constitutes an adequate smear in fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast? Cancer. 1998;84(1):57-61.

Zajdela A, Ghossein NA, Pilleron JP, Ennuyer A. The value of aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast cancer: experience at the Fondation Curie. Cancer. 1975;35(2):499-506.

Layfield LJ, Dodd LG. Cytologically low grade malignancies: an important interpretative pitfall responsible for false negative diagnoses in fine-needle aspiration of the breast. Diagn Cytopa- thol. 1996;15(3):250-9.

Feichter GE, Haberthür F, Gobat S, Dalquen P. Breast cytology. Statistical analysis and cytohistologic correlations. Acta Cytol. 1997;41(2):327-32.

Arisio R, Cuccorese C, Accinelli G, Mano MP, Bordon R, Fessia

L. Role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in breast lesions: analysis of a series of 4,110 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 1998;18(6):462-7.

Ariga R, Bloom K, Reddy VB, et al. Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation. Am J Surg. 2002;184(5):410-3.

Downloads

Published

2005-11-11

How to Cite

1.
Freitas Júnior R, Moreira MAR, Souza GA de, Hardy E, Paulinelli RR. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast lesions: a comparison between two devices for obtaining cytological samples. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2005 Nov. 11 [cited 2025 Oct. 16];123(6):271-6. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/2378

Issue

Section

Original Article