Follow-up evaluation of children with birth weight less than or equal to 2,000 g
Keywords:
Anthropometry, Newborn infant, Low birth weight infant, Very low birth weight infant, Fetal growth retardationAbstract
CONTEXT: During the first year of life, the growth process is highly vulnerable to several impairing factors that need to be understood. OBJECTIVE: To perform follow-up evaluation on newborns weighing less than or equal to 2,000 g in a population of low socioeconomic level. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective. SETTING: Hospital Maternidade Escola de Vila Nova Cachoeirinha, São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: The study included 60 children born between March 1996 and January 1998, weighing less than or equal to 2,000 g. They were divided into three subgroups, according to birth weight and adequacy for gestational age. The factors studied were maternal variables, illnesses among the newborns, hospital admissions subsequent to discharge from the nursery, and the evolution of weight from birth until 12 months of life. Statistical analyses were performed through application of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) V.9.0 and Curve Expert 1.3 programs. RESULTS: Previous maternal diseases occurred in 38.6% of the pregnant women and intercurrent events occurred in 100%. The prevailing neonatal diseases were sepsis (30%) and hyaline membrane disease (25%). There were 404 visits on an outpatient basis: the most frequently diagnosed complaints related to respiratory diseases (26%). Among visits to specialists, 81.7% were to the neuropediatrician. A diagnosis of normality was made for 80% of all visits, for all specialties. For each of these groups, a growth curve was established. These were shown to be below the reference curve standards, with such differences least evident with regard to the children’s corrected age. DISCUSSION: The severity of the newborns’conditions may be related to the high incidence of maternal diseases prior to pregnancy as well as intercurrent events during pregnancy. The differences in growth in relation to NCHS charts show that corrected age should be used as a parameter. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic conditions, clinical/ obstetric events and newborn diseases during the hospital stay had repercussions on these children’s progress during their first year of life. Their growth profile was found to be very far from the reference standard, thus indicating a need for constant, differentiated assessment.
Downloads
References
Moron AF, Cha SC. Organização de um serviço de medicina fetal. In: Moron AF, Cha SC, Isfer EV. Abordagem multiprofissional em medicina fetal. São Paulo: SOBRAMEF. Escritório Editorial; 1996. p. 1-4.
Segre CAM, Lippi UG. Medicina fetal. Aspectos diagnósticos, terapêuticos e preventivos. In: Segre CAM, editor. Perinatologia: fundamentos e prática. São Paulo: Sarvier; 2002. p.15-22.
Bernbaum JC. Medical care after discharge. In: Avery GB, Fletcher MA, MacDonald MG, editors. Neonatology: Pathophysiology and Management of the Newborn. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lip- pincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers; 1999. p.1463-77.
Cuminisky M.. Manual de crecimiento y desarrollo del niño. Washington: OPS/OMS; 1986.
National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Clinical Growth Charts. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/ growthcharts/clinical_charts.htm. Accessed in 2004 (Jul 15).
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) StatSoft [computer program]. Version 9.0. Tulsa: Statistics/Mac; 2000.
OMS. Necesidades de salud de los adolescentes. Informe de un Comité de Expertos de la OMS. Serie de Informes Técnicos no 609. Geneva: OMS; 1977.
World Health Organization. Risk approach for maternal and child health care: a managerial strategy to improve the coverage and quality of maternal and child health/family planning services based on the measurement of individual and community risk. Geneva; 1978.
Vitalle MSS, Nóbrega FJ. Gravidez na adolescência. [Adoles- cence pregnancy]. Rev Paul Pediatr. 1996;14(4):183-6.
Tomasi E, Barros FC, Victora CG. . Situação socioeconômica e condições de vida: comparação de duas coortes de base popu- lacional no sul do Brasil. [Socioeconomic situation and living conditions: comparison of two population-based cohorts from southern Brazil]. Cad Saúde Pública. 1996;12(Supl 1):15-9.
Gross SJ, Mettelman BB, Dye TD, Slagle TA. Impact of family structure and stability on academic outcome in preterm children at 10 years of age. J Pediatr. 2001;138(2):169-75.
Comitê Central de Mortalidade Materna. Sub-Programa de Preven- ção à Mortalidade Materna no Município de São Paulo. Relatório do ano de 1996. São Paulo: Secretaria Municipal de Saúde; 1999.
Furman L, Baley J, Borawski-Clark E, Aucott S, Hack M. Hospitalization as a measure of morbidity among very low birth weight infants with chronic lung disease. J Pediatric. 1996;128(4):447-52.
Dallman PR. Nutritional anemia. In: Rudolph AM, editor. Pediatrics. Norwalk: Appleton and Lange; 1981. p. 1091-6.
Silber M. Distúrbios hematológicos. Anemias. In: Segre CAM, editor. Perinatologia: fundamentos e prática. São Paulo: Sarvier; 2002. p. 566-73.
Halpern R, Giugliani ERJ, Victora CG, Barros FC, Horta BL. Fatores de risco para suspeita de atraso no desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor aos 12 meses de vida. [Risk factors for suspi- cion of developmental delays at 12 months of age]. J Pediatr. 2000;76(6):421-8.
Kashyap S, Heird WC. Protein requirements of low birth weight, very low birth weight, and small for gestation age infants. In: Raiha NCR, editor. Protein metabolism during infancy. New York: Raven Press; 1994. p. 133-46.
Ehrenkranz RA, Younes N, Lemons J, et al. Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 1999;104(2 Pt 1):280-9.
Lemons JA, Bauer CR, Oh W, et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child health and human development neonatal research network, January 1995 through December 1996. NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediat- rics. 2001;107(1):E1.
Bustos LG, Medina López C, Pállas Alonso CR, et al. Evolución del peso, la longitud--talla y el perímetro craneal en los prema- turos de menos de 1.500 gramos al nacimiento.[Changes in weight, length and head circumference in premature newborn babies weighing less than 1,500 grams at birth]. An Esp Pediatr. 1998;48(3):283-7.
Jaruratanasirikul S, Chanvitan P, Janjindamai W, Ritsmitchai S. Growth patterns of low-birth-weight infants: 2-year longitudinal study. J Med Assoc Thai. 1999;82(4):325-31.
Monset-Couchard MM, de Bethmann O. Catch-up growth in 166 small-for-gestational age premature infants weighing less than 1,000 g at birth. Biol Neonate. 2000;78(3):161-7.
Hack M, Fanaroff AA. Outcomes of extremely-low-birth- weight infants between 1982 and 1988. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(24):1642-7.
