Testicular sperm results in elevated miscarriage rates compared to epididymal sperm in azoospermic patients

Authors

  • Edson Borges Júnior “Fertility” Centro de Fertilização Assistida
  • Lia Mara Rossi-Ferragut “Fertility” - Centro de Fertilização Assistida
  • Fábio Firmbach Pasqualotto “Fertility” - Centro de Fertilização Assistida
  • Daniela Regina dos Santos “Fertility” Centro de Fertilização Assistida
  • Cláudia Chagas Rocha “Fertility” Centro de Fertilização Assistida
  • Assumpto Iaconelli Júnior “Fertility” Centro de Fertilização Assistida

Keywords:

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Azoospermia, Spermatozoa retrieval

Abstract

CONTEXT: Several sperm retrieval techniques are available for use on azoospermic men. Comparisons between spermatozoa retrieved from the testicles and epididymis in relation to pregnancy and miscarriage rates are not well established. OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy and miscarriage rates using sperm retrieved from the testes and epididymis using intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Furthermore, we evaluated the fertilization and pregnancy rates according to the status of the spermatozoa retrieved (motile or immotile). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: A private center for assisted fertilization. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and eight consecutive patients who presented with azoospermia were included in our study, on whom a total of 144 retrieval procedures were performed. PROCEDURES: Of the 144 retrieval procedures, 104 were testicular sperm aspirations (TESA) and 40 were epididymal sperm aspirations (PESA). PESA was the first approach in obstructive patients (n = 68), whereas TESA was used when the former failed. For non-obstructive patients (n = 40), TESA was the method of retrieval. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Pregnancy and miscarriage rates according to spermatozoa characteristics (motile or immotile). RESULTS: The number of cycles performed using spermatozoa retrieved from the testicles and epididymis was 81 and 30, respectively. Motile spermatozoa had higher fertilization (2PN) and pregnancy rates compared to immotile spermatozoa (p < 0.05). Also, motile spermatozoa had lower miscarriage rates compared to immotile spermatozoa (p < 0.0001). No differences were seen in pregnancy rates with testicular spermatozoa (n = 28) compared to epididymal spermatozoa (n = 13) (p = 0.1). However, the miscarriages rates were higher in spermatozoa retrieved from the testicles (n = 12) compared to epididymis retrievals (n = 1) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although pregnancy rates were similar when the intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed with spermatozoa retrieved from the testicles and epididymis, the use of testicular spermatozoa yields a significantly higher miscarriage rate. It is possible that the higher miscarriage rate seen in patients using spermatozoa retrieved from the testicles is linked to high genetic sperm abnormalities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Edson Borges Júnior, “Fertility” Centro de Fertilização Assistida

MD. Director of the “Fertility” Centro de Fertilização Assistida; President of the Comitê de Reprodução Humana da Associação Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil.

Lia Mara Rossi-Ferragut, “Fertility” - Centro de Fertilização Assistida

BSc, MSc. Embryologist; Scientific Department of “Fertility” - Centro de Fertilização Assistida, São Paulo; Teacher in College of Medicine, Jundiaí, São Paulo, Brazil.

Fábio Firmbach Pasqualotto, “Fertility” - Centro de Fertilização Assistida

MD, MSc. Doctor in Departamento de Urologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Daniela Regina dos Santos, “Fertility” Centro de Fertilização Assistida

Embryologist in the IVF Laboratory, “Fertility” Centro de Fertilização Assistida, São Paulo, Brazil.

Cláudia Chagas Rocha, “Fertility” Centro de Fertilização Assistida

BSc. Embryologist in the IVF Laboratory, “Fertility” Centro de Fertilização Assistida, São Paulo, Brazil.

Assumpto Iaconelli Júnior, “Fertility” Centro de Fertilização Assistida

MD. Director of the “Fertility” Centro de Fertilização Assistida, São Paulo, Brazil.

References

Ezeh UI. Beyond the clinical classification of azoospermia: opinion. Hum Reprod 2000;15(11):2356-9.

Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem, AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992;340:17-8.

Van Steirteghem AC, Nagy ZP, Joris H, et al. High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1061-6.

Sallam HN, Farrag A, Agameya AF, et al. Factors affecting the success of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in cases of non- obstructive azoospermia. Reproductive Technologies 2001;10(5):261-7.

Jow WW, Steckel J, Schlegel P, et al. Motile sperm in human testis biopsy specimens. J Andrology 1993;14(3):194-8.

Moraes LAM, Clarizia A, Marinho RM, Caetano JPJ. Factors of failed fertilization after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Jornal Brasileiro de Reprodução Assistida 2000;4(1):40-4.

Nagy ZP, Joris H, Verheyen G, et al. Correlation between motility of testicular spermatozoa, testicular histology and the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998;13(4):890-5.

Shulman A, Feldman B, Madgar I, et al. In vitro fertilization treatment for severe male factor: the fertilization potential of immotile spermatozoa obtained by testicular extraction. Hum Reprod 1999;14:749-52.

Eliasson R, Mossberg B, Cammer P, Afzelius BA. The immotile- cilia syndrome: a congenital ciliary abnormality as an etiologic factor in chronic airway infections and male sterility. N Engl J Med 1977;297:1-6.

Asch R, Simerly C, Ord T, et al. The stages at which human fertilization arrests: microtubule and chromosome configurations in inseminated oocytes that failed to complete fertilization and development in humans. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1897-906.

Hewitson LC, Simerly CR, Tengowski MW, et al. Microtubule and chromatin configurations during rhesus intracytoplasmic sperm injection: successes and failures. Biol Reprod 1996;55:271-80.

Hewitson LC, Simerly CR, Schatten G. Cytoplasmic endowment of organelles other than mitochondria. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D. Towards reproductive certainty: fertility and genetics beyond 1999. New York: Parthenon Publishing Group.

Sallam HN, Farrag A, Agameya AF, et al. The use of a modified hypo-osmotic swelling test for the selection of viable ejaculated and testicular immotile spermatozoa in ICSI. Hum Reprod 2000;16(2):272-6.

Davis RO, Overstreet JW, et al. Movement characteristics of human epididymal sperm used for fertilization of human oocytes in vitro. Fertil Steril 1991;56:1128-35.

Ron-El R, Herman A, Golan A, et al. Gonadotrophins and combined gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist – gonadotrophin protocols in a randomized prospective study. Fertil Steril 1999;55:574-8.

Thanki KH, Gagliardi CL, Schmidt CL. Poor in vitro fertilization outcome with semen yielding low sperm density “swim-ups” is not because of altered sperm motion parameters. Fertil. Steril 1992;58:770-5.

Janny I, Menezo YVO. Development and blastocyst formation. Mol Rep Dev 1994;38:36-42.

Strassburger D, Friedler S, Raziel A, et al. Very low sperm count affects the result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Gen 2000;17(8):431-6.

Plachot M. Genetic risks associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Contracept Fertil Sex 1996;24:577-80.

Ariel M, Cedar H, McCarrey J. Developmental changes in methylation of spermatogenesis-specific genes includes reprogramming in the epididymis. Nature Genet 1994;7:59-63. Cited in: Tsai MC, Takeuchi T, Bedford JM, et al. Alternative sources of gametes: reality or science fiction? Hum Reprod 2000;15(5):988-98.

Yamasaki R, Farah LMS, Fragoso JB, Carrara RCV. Genética e Infertilidade Masculina. I Consenso Brasileiro da Infertilidade Masculina, SBU, Campos de Jordão, São Paulo, 1999.

Almodin CG, Pereira LAC, Câmara-Minguetti VC. Chromosome evaluation of infertile men prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Jornal Brasileiro de Reprodução Assistida 2000; 4(2):60-3.

Tesarik J, Mendoza C. Spermatid injection into human oocytes. I. Laboratory techniques and special features of zygote development. Hum Reprod 1996;11:772-9.

Palermo GD, Schlegel PN, Hariprashad JJ, et al. Fertilization and pregnancy outcome with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for azoospermic men. Hum Reprod 1999;14:741-8.

Moomjy M, Sills ES, Rosenwaks Z, et al. Implication of complete fertilization failure after intracytoplasmic sperm injection for subsequent fertilization and reproductive outcome. Hum Reprod 1998;13:2212-6.

Downloads

Published

2002-07-07

How to Cite

1.
Borges Júnior E, Rossi-Ferragut LM, Pasqualotto FF, Santos DR dos, Rocha CC, Iaconelli Júnior A. Testicular sperm results in elevated miscarriage rates compared to epididymal sperm in azoospermic patients. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2002 Jul. 7 [cited 2025 Oct. 16];120(4):122-6. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/2716

Issue

Section

Original Article