Sociodemographic, behavioral, obstetric, and healthcare factors associated with low weight at birth: a case-control study

Authors

Keywords:

Birth weight, Pregnancy, Prenatal care, Infant, Public policy, Infant care, Maternal-child health, Low weight at birth, Health in pregnancy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding social determinants is crucial for implementing preventive strategies, especially for low birth weight (LBW)—a public health issue that severely increases the risk of morbimortality in children.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the factors associated with LBW among newborns, assisted by the Brazilian Unified Health System.
DESIGN AND SETTING: It analyzed data from newborns and their mothers. The sample was selected by convenience from users of the public health system in Francisco Beltrão (Paraná, Brazil).
METHODS: Cases (n = 26) were babies weighing ≤ 2,500 g and controls (n = 52) > 2,500 g. All babies were assessed and paired by sex and date of birth in a 1:2 proportion. Statistical power was computed a posteriori, revealing a power of 87% (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: Strong and significant differences were found in the bivariate analysis, in which the number of current smokers or those who quit during pregnancy was higher among mothers of babies with LBW. Moreover, the gestational weeks were lower among these cases. Logistic regression models indicated that the gestational week (odds ratio [OR] = 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.05–0.54) and fathers’ educational level (high school or above; OR = 0.22, 95% CI:0.06–0.99) were related to lower chances of low birth weight.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm previous investigations on LBW’s multi-causality, showing that the gestational week could reduce up to 82% chances of a baby being born with ≤ 2,500 g. Its association with paternal education underlines the importance of comprehensive policies to protect newborns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Viviane Tazinasso Cluzeni, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil

MSc. Nutritionist and Student, Postgraduate Program of Applied Health Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE), Francisco Beltrão (PR), Brazil.

Guilherme Welter Wendt, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil

PhD. Psychologist and Adjunct Professor, Health Sciences Center, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE), Francisco Beltrão (PR), Brazil.

Lirane Elize Defante Ferreto, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil

PhD. Pharmacist, Associate Professor, Health Sciences Center, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE), Francisco Beltrão (PR), Brazil.

Léia Carolina Lucio, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil

PhD. Biologist and Associate Professor, Health Sciences Center, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE), Francisco Beltrão (PR), Brazil.

Claudicéia Risso-Pascotto, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil

PhD. Biologist and Associate Professor, Health Sciences Center, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE), Francisco Beltrão (PR), Brazil.

References

Rogers JM. Smoking and pregnancy: Epigenetics and developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome. Birth Defects Res. 2019;111(17):1259-

PMID: 31313499; https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.1550.

World Health Organization. Global Nutrition Targets 2025: low birth weight policy brief. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/149020. Accessed in 2023 (Mar 20).

Hughes MM, Black RE, Katz J. 2500-g low birth weight cutoff: history and implications for future research and policy. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(2):283-9. PMID: 27449779; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995016-2131-9.

Lima MC, de Oliveira GS, Lyra Cde O, Roncalli AG, Ferreira MA. A desigualdade espacial do baixo peso ao nascer no Brasil [The spatial inequality of low birth weight in Brazil]. Cien Saude Colet. 2013;18(8):2443-52. PMID: 23896927; https://doi.org/10.1590/s141381232013000800029.

Brasil. Sistema Único de Saúde. Tabnet - Datasus. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2021. Available from: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/. Accessed in 2023 (Mar 20).

Mesquita Costa G, Domingues Tibúrcio J, Conceição de Oliveira V, Laerte Gontijo T, Albano de Azevedo Guimarães E. Low birth weight determinants present in the statement of live birth. Cienc Enferm. 2014;20(3):21-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95532014000300003.

Carreli GZ, Martins GKF, Gois JG, et al. Prevalence of excess weight and obesity in pregnant women. RSD. 2020;9(8):e587985835. https://doi. org/10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5835.

Alexopoulos AS, Blair R, Peters AL. Management of preexisting diabetes in pregnancy: a review. JAMA. 2019;321(18):1811-9. PMID: 31087027; https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.4981.

Dutton H, Borengasser SJ, Gaudet LM, Barbour LA, Keely EJ. Obesity in pregnancy: optimizing outcomes for mom and baby. Med Clin North

Am. 2018;102(1):87-106. PMID: 29156189; https://doi.org/10.1016/j. mcna.2017.08.008.

Abraham M, Alramadhan S, Iniguez C, et al. A systematic review of maternal smoking during pregnancy and fetal measurements with meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0170946. PMID: 28231292; https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170946.

Oliveira TA, Bersusa AAS, Santos TF, Aquino MM, Mariani Neto C. Perinatal outcomes in pregnant women users of illegal drugs. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016;38(4):183-8. PMID: 27088708; https://doi. org/10.1055/s-0036-1580710.

Lagadec N, Steinecker M, Kapassi A, et al. Factors influencing the quality of life of pregnant women: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):455. PMID: 30470200; https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12884-018-2087-4.

Garcia ÉM, Martinelli KG, Gama SGND, et al. Gestational risk and social inequalities: a possible relationship? Cien Saude Colet. 2019;24(12):4633-42. PMID: 31778513; https://doi.org/10.1590/1413812320182412.31422017.

Leal MDC, Esteves-Pereira AP, Viellas EF, Domingues RMSM, Gama SGND. Prenatal care in the Brazilian public health services. Rev Saude Publica. 2020;54:8. PMID: 31967277; https://doi.org/10.11606/s15188787.2020054001458.

Coutinho E, Araújo L, Pereira C, et al. Fatores associados ao baixo peso ao nascer. Rev INFAD Psicol. 2016;1(2):431-40. Available from: https://revista.infad.

eu/index.php/IJODAEP/article/view/229/514. Accessed in 2023 (Apr 28).

Defilipo ÉC, Chagas PSC, Drumond CM, Ribeiro LC. Factors associated with premature birth: a case-control study. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2022;40:e2020486. PMID: 35544903; https://doi.org/10.1590/19840462/2022/40/2020486in.

Schoeps D, Furquim de Almeida M, Alencar GP, et al. Fatores de risco para mortalidade neonatal precoce [Risk factors for early neonatal mortality]. Rev Saude Publica. 2007;41(6):1013-22. PMID: 18066471; https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102007000600017.

Rothman KJ, Lash TL. Case control studies. In: Rothman K, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 2008. 111-27.

Veloso FCS, Kassar LML, Oliveira MJC, et al. Analysis of neonatal mortality risk factors in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Pediatr. 2019;95(5):519-30. PMID: 31028747; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2018.12.014.

Sousa MG, Lopes RGC, Rocha MLTLFD, et al. Epidemiology of artherial hypertension in pregnants. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2019;18:eAO4682. PMID: 31664330; https://doi.org/10.31744/ einstein_journal/2020ao4682.

Ferguson CJ. An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2009;40(5):532-8. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808.

Nemes S, Jonasson JM, Genell A, Steineck G. Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample size. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:56. PMID: 19635144; https://doi. org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-56.

Moreira AIM, Sousa PRM, Sarno F. Low birth weight and its associated factors. Einstein (São Paulo). 2018;16(4):eAO4251. PMID: 30427482; https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2018ao4251.

Oliveira Pessoa TA, de Godoy Martins CB, Aguiar Lima FC, Munhoz Gaiva MA. O crescimento e desenvolvimento frente à prematuridade e baixo peso ao nascer. Av Enferm. 2016;33(3):401-11. https://doi.org/10.15446/ av.enferm.v33n3.44425.

Sousa JL, Alencar GP, Antunes JLF, Silva ZPD. Marcadores de desigualdade na autoavaliação da saúde de adultos no Brasil, segundo o sexo [Markers of inequality in self-rated health in Brazilian adults according to sex]. Cad Saude Publica. 2020;36(5):e00230318. PMID: 32490914; https:// doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00230318.

Li J, Qiu J, Lv L, et al. Paternal factors and adverse birth outcomes in Lanzhou, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):19. PMID: 33407234; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03492-9.

Alipour Z, Kheirabadi GR, Kazemi A, Fooladi M. The most important risk factors affecting mental health during pregnancy: a systematic review.

East Mediterr Health J. 2018;24(6):549-59. PMID: 30079950; https://doi. org/10.26719/2018.24.6.549.

Janssen BG, Gyselaers W, Byun HM, et al. Placental mitochondrial DNA and CYP1A1 gene methylation as molecular signatures for tobacco smoke exposure in pregnant women and the relevance for birth weight. J Transl Med. 2017;15(1):5. PMID: 28052772; https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12967-016-1113-4.

Cunha AC, Lacerda JT, Alcauza MTR, Natal S. Evaluation of prenatal care in primary health care in Brazil. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. 2019;19(2):447-58. https://doi.org/10.1590/180693042019000200011.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-24

How to Cite

1.
Cluzeni VT, Wendt GW, Ferreto LED, Lucio LC, Risso-Pascotto C. Sociodemographic, behavioral, obstetric, and healthcare factors associated with low weight at birth: a case-control study. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 24 [cited 2025 Oct. 15];142(1):1-9. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/2986

Issue

Section

Original Article