Incidência de doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica com base em três critérios diagnósticos espirométricos em São Paulo, Brasil

seguimento de nove anos após o estudo de prevalência PLATINO

Autores

  • Graciane Laender Moreira Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp)
  • Mariana Rodrigues Gazzotti Centro Universitário São Camilo
  • Beatriz Martins Manzano Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp)
  • Oliver Nascimento Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp)
  • Rogelio Perez-Padilla National Institute of Respiratory Diseases
  • Ana Maria Baptista Menezes Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel)
  • José Roberto Jardim Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp)

Palavras-chave:

Doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica, Incidência, Diagnóstico, Epidemiologia, Espirometria

Resumo

CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: A doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (DPOC) é uma enfermidade respiratória de alta prevalência e grande impacto socioeconômico no mundo e afeta aproximadamente 16% da po-pulação paulista. A incidência da DPOC ainda é desconhecida no Brasil. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os novos casos de DPOC numa amostra de base populacional em São Paulo, Brasil, considerando três diferentes critérios diagnósticos espirométricos, e avaliar a concordância entre esses critérios. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo de coorte prospectivo, na cidade de São Paulo, Brasil. MÉTODOS: Foi aplicado um questionário e realizadas a antropometria e espirometria pré e pós-bronco-dilatador nos mesmos indivíduos do Estudo PLATINO inicial (2003), de São Paulo. Dados deste estudo de seguimento foram adicionados ao banco de dados original da fase inicial. Os casos incidentes da DPOC se referem aos indivíduos que desenvolveram a doença de acordo com cada critério espirométrico durante os nove anos de seguimento. Foi utilizado o programa Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) na análise e o nível de significância foi P < 0.05. RESULTADOS: Participaram do seguimento 613 indivíduos. Os novos casos de DPOC variaram de 1,4% a 4,0%, dependendo do critério diagnóstico utilizado, e a concordância entre os critérios para identificar os casos incidentes variou de 35% a 60%. CONCLUSÃO: A incidência da DPOC após nove anos de seguimento foi alta, porém variável de acordo com o critério espirométrico utilizado. A concordância entre os critérios para identificar os novos casos da doença variou de 35% a 60%.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Graciane Laender Moreira, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp)

PhD. Physiotherapist, Department of Translational Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

Mariana Rodrigues Gazzotti, Centro Universitário São Camilo

PhD. Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Centro Universitário São Camilo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Beatriz Martins Manzano, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp)

PhD. Physiotherapist, Department of Translational Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

Oliver Nascimento, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp)

MD, PhD. Pulmonology Sector, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

Rogelio Perez-Padilla, National Institute of Respiratory Diseases

MD. Adjunct Professor, National Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Mexico City, Mexico.

Ana Maria Baptista Menezes, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel)

MD, PhD. Adjunct Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

José Roberto Jardim, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp)

MD, PhD. Adjunct Professor, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

Referências

López Varela MV, Montes de Oca M. Variability in COPD: the PLATINO study viewpoint. Arch Bronconeumol. 2012;48(4):105-6.

Menezes AM, Jardim JR, Pérez-Padilla R, et al. Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and associated factors: the PLATINO Study in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2005;21(5):1565-73.

Rycroft CE, Heyes A, Lanza L, Becker K. Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a literature review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:457-94.

Johannessen A, Omenaas E, Bakke P, Gulsvik A. Incidence of GOLD-defined chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a general adult population. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005;9(8):926-32.

Lindberg A, Jonsson AC, Rönmark E, et al. Ten-year cumulative incidence of COPD and risk factors for incident disease in a symptomatic cohort. Chest. 2005;127(5):1544-52.

Lindberg A, Eriksson B, Larsson LG, et al. Seven-year cumulative incidence of COPD in an age-stratified general population sample. Chest. 2006;129(4):879-85.

Løkke A, Lange P, Scharling H, Fabricius P, Vestbo J. Developing COPD: a 25 year follow up study of the general population. Thorax. 2006;61(11):935-9.

Pelkonen M, Notkola IL, Nissinen A, Tukiainen H, Koskela H. Thirty-year cumulative incidence of chronic bronchitis and COPD in relation to 30-year pulmonary function and 40-year mortality: a follow-up in middle-aged rural men. Chest. 2006;130(4):1129-37.

de Marco R, Accordini S, Cerveri I, et al. Incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a cohort of young adults according to the presence of chronic cough and phlegm. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175(1):32-9.

Kojima S, Sakakibara H, Motani S, et al. Incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and the relationship between age and smoking in a Japanese population. J Epidemiol. 2007;17(2):54-60.

de Marco R, Accordini S, Marcon A, et al. Risk factors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a European cohort of young adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(7):891-7.

Vestbo J, Hurd SS, Agustí AG, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(4):347-65.

Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(5):948-68.

Swanney MP, Jensen RL, Crichton DA, et al. FEV(6) is an acceptable surrogate for FVC in the spirometric diagnosis of airway obstruction and restriction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(3 Pt 1):917-9.

Soriano JB, Lamprecht B. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a worldwide problem. Med Clin North Am. 2012;96(4):671-80.

Joo MJ, Au DH, Lee TA. Use of spirometry in the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and efforts to improve quality of care. Transl Res. 2009;154(3):103-10.

Perez-Padilla R, Wehrmeister FC, Celli BR, et al. Reliability of FEV1/ FEV6 to diagnose airflow obstruction compared with FEV1/FVC: the PLATINO longitudinal study. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e67960.

Perez-Padilla R, Torre Bouscoulet L, Vazquez-Garcia JC, et al. Valores de referencia para la espirometría después de la inhalación de 200 microg de salbutamol [Spirometry reference values after inhalation of 200 microg of salbutamol]. Arch Bronconeumol. 2007;43(10):530-4.

Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152(5 Pt 2):S77-121.

Siafakas NM, Vermeire P, Pride NB, et al. Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The European Respiratory Society Task Force. Eur Respir J. 1995;8(8):1398-420.

BTS guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The COPD Guidelines Group of the Standards of Care Committee of the BTS. Thorax. 1997;52 Suppl 5:S1-28.

Celli BR, Halbert RJ, Isonaka S, Schau B. Population impact of different definitions of airway obstruction. Eur Respir J. 2003;22(2):268-73.

Borrego LM, Couto M, Almeida I, et al. Avaliação da função respiratória: comparação entre valores de referência percentuais fixos e o 5o percentil para diagnóstico de obstrução das vias aéreas [Lung function evaluation: comparing fixed percentage reference values vs. the 5th percentile in the diagnosis of airway obstruction]. Braz J Allergy Immunol. 2013;1(4):229-35.

Güder G, Brenner S, Angermann CE, et al. “GOLD or lower limit of normal definition? A comparison with expert-based diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a prospective cohort-study”. Respir Res. 2012;13(1):13.

Ferguson GT, Enright PL, Buist AS, Higgins MW. Office spirometry for lung health assessment in adults: A consensus statement from the National Lung Health Education Program. Chest. 2000;117(4):1146-61.

Swanney MP, Beckert LE, Frampton CM, et al. Validity of the American Thoracic Society and other spirometric algorithms using FVC and forced expiratory volume at 6 s for predicting a reduced total lung capacity. Chest. 2004;126(6):1861-6.

Hansen JE, Sun XG, Wasserman K. Should forced expiratory volume in six seconds replace forced vital capacity to detect airway obstruction? Eur Respir J. 2006;27(6):1244-50.

Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Agarwal R, Jindal SK. Comparison of the lower confidence limit to the fixed-percentage method for assessing airway obstruction in routine clinical practice. Respir Care. 2011;56(11):1778-84.

Vandevoorde J, Verbanck S, Schuermans D, Kartounian J, Vincken W. FEV1/FEV6 and FEV6 as an alternative for FEV1/FVC and FVC in the spirometric detection of airway obstruction and restriction. Chest. 2005;127(5):1560-4.

Celli BR, Halbert RJ. Point: should we abandon FEV1/FVC < 0.70 to detect airway obstruction? No. Chest. 2010;138(5):1037-40.

Enright P, Brusasco V. Counterpoint: should we abandon FEV1/FVC < 0.70 to detect airway obstruction? Yes. Chest. 2010;138(5):1040-2; discussion 1042-4.

de Marco R. What evidence could validate the definition of COPD? Thorax. 2008;63(9):756-7.

Lamprecht B, Schirnhofer L, Kaiser B, et al. Subjects with Discordant Airways Obstruction: Lost between Spirometric Definitions of COPD. Pulm Med. 2011;2011:780215.

Meyer KC. Aging. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2005;2(5):433-9.

Stanojevic S, Wade A, Stocks J, et al. Reference ranges for spirometry across all ages: a new approach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(3):253-60.

Hansen JE, Sun XG, Wasserman K. Spirometric criteria for airway obstruction: Use percentage of FEV1/FVC ratio below the fifth percentile, not < 70%. Chest. 2007;131(2):349-55.

Mannino DM, Sonia Buist A, Vollmer WM. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the older adult: what defines abnormal lung function? Thorax. 2007;62(3):237-41.

Gershon AS, Wang C, Wilton AS, Raut R, To T. Trends in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence, incidence, and mortality in Ontario, Canada, 1996 to 2007: a population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(6):560-5.

Downloads

Publicado

2015-05-05

Como Citar

1.
Moreira GL, Gazzotti MR, Manzano BM, Nascimento O, Perez-Padilla R, Menezes AMB, Jardim JR. Incidência de doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica com base em três critérios diagnósticos espirométricos em São Paulo, Brasil: seguimento de nove anos após o estudo de prevalência PLATINO. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 5º de maio de 2015 [citado 10º de março de 2025];133(3):245-51. Disponível em: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1085

Edição

Seção

Artigo Original