Malformações Müllerianas
revisão da abordagem atual
Palavras-chave:
Anormalidades urogenitais, Ductos de Müller, Desenvolvimento embrionário, Laparoscopia, Infertilidade, GinecologiaResumo
O objetivo deste trabalho foi discutir as malformações müllerianas desde seus aspectos embriológicos, analisando os atuais métodos diagnóstico e terapêuticos. As malformações müllerianas são anomalias congênitas do trato reprodutivo feminino decorrentes de falha do desenvolvimento dos ductos de Müller e estruturas associadas. Sua causa não foi completamente elucidada, acreditando-se, atualmente, que seja multifatorial. Os sintomas se manifestam, principalmente, durante a adolescência e início da vida adulta, e afetam a capacidade reprodutiva dessas mulheres. A partir da suspeita clínica, a investigação diagnóstica inclui métodos de imagem, como a histerosalpingografia, ultrassonografia e ressonância magnética. A classificação das malformações está relacionada à sua embriogênese e direciona a terapêutica e prognóstico. As malformações müllerianas são um grupo amplo de anomalias que variam de paciente para paciente. Portanto, sua abordagem também é individual, devendo-se considerar os aspectos anatômicos, clínicos e o desejo da paciente.
Downloads
Referências
Pui MH. Imaging diagnosis of congenital uterine malformation. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2004;28(7):425-33.
Propst AM, Hill JA 3rd. Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18(4):341-50.
Golan A, Langer R, Bukovsky I, Caspi E. Congenital anomalies of the müllerian system. Fertil Steril. 1989:51(5):747-55.
Li S, Qayyum A, Coakley FV, Hricak H. Association of renal agenesis and mullerian duct anomalies. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;24(6):829-34.
Rackow BW, Arici A. Reproductive performance of women with müllerian anomalies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19(3):229-37.
Homer HA, Li TC, Cooke ID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(1):1-14.
Sharara FI. Complete uterine septum with cervical duplication, longitudinal vagi- nal septum and duplication of a renal collecting system. A case report. J Reprod Med. 1998;43(12):1055-9.
Milhan D. DES exposure: implications for childbearing. Int J Childbirth Educ. 1992;7(4):21-8.
Suzuki A, Urushitani H, Sato T, et al. Gene expression change in the Müllerian duct of the mou- se fetus exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2007;232(4):503- 14.
Burel A, Mouchel T, Odent S, et al. Role of HOXA7 to HOXA13 and PBX1 genes in various for- ms of MRKH syndrome (congenital absence of uterus and vagina). J Negat Results Biomed. 2006;5:4.
Klipstein S, Bhagavath B, Topipat C, Sasur L, Reindollar RH, Gray MR. The N314D polymor- phism of the GALT gene is not associated with congenital absence of the uterus and vagina. Mol Hum Reprod. 2003;9(3):171-4.
The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49(6):944-55.
Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G. Septums and synechiae: approaches to surgical correction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49(4)767-88.
Johansen K. Pregnancy in a rudimentary horn. Two case reports. Obstet Gynecol. 1969;34(6):805-8.
Nawroth F, Schmidt T, Freise C, Foth D, Römer T. Is it possible to recommend an “optimal“ postoperative management after hysteroscopic metroplasty? A retrospective study with 52 infertile patients showing a septate uterus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81(1):55-7.
Green LK, Harris RE. Uterine anomalies. Frequency of diagnosis and associated obstetric complications. Obstet Gynecol. 1976;47(4):427-9.
Heinonen PK. Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies after abdomi- nal or hysteroscopic metroplasty or no surgical treatment. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997;4(3):311-7.
Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simón C, Pellicer A. Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(10):2277-81.
Acién P. Reproductive performance of women with uterine malformations. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(1):122-6.
Scarsbrook AF, Moore NR. MRI appearances of müllerian duct abnormalities. Clin Radiol. 2003;58(10):747-54.
Mazouni C, Girard G, Deter R, Haumonte JB, Blanc B, Bretelle F. Diagnosis of Mullerian anomalies in adults: evaluation of practice. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):219-22.
Braun P, Grau FV, Pons RM, Enguix DP. Is hysterosalpingography able to diagnose all uterine malformations correctly? A retrospective study. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53(2):274-9.
Sørensen SS. Hysteroscopic evaluation and endocrinological aspects of women with mülle- rian anomalies and oligomenorrhea. Int J Fertil. 1987;32(6):445-52.
Doyle MB. Magnetic resonance imaging in müllerian fusion defects. J Reprod Med. 1992;37(1):33-8.
Pellerito JS, McCarthy SM, Doyle MB, Glickman MG, DeCherney AH. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingo- graphy. Radiology. 1992;183(3):795-800.
Ozsarlak O, De Schepper AM, Valkenburg M, Delbeke L. Septate uterus: hysterosalpingogra- phy and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Eur J Radiol. 1995;21(2)122-5.
Ferreira AC, Mauad Filho F, Nicolau LG, Gallarreta FMP, Paula WM, Gomes DC. Ultra-sonogra- fia tridimensional em ginecologia: malformações uterinas. [Three-dimensional ultrasound in gynecology: uterine malformations]. Radiol Bras. 2007;40(2):131-6.
Imaoka I, Wada A, Matsuo M, Yoshida M, Kitagaki H, Sugimura K. MR imaging of disorders associated with female infertility: use in diagnosis, treatment, and management. Radiogra- phics. 2003;23(6):1401-21.
Regev M, Kirk R, Mashevich M, Bistritzer Z, Reish O.Vertical transmission of a mutation in exon 1 of the WT1 gene: lessons for genetic counseling. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A(18):2332-6.
Fayez JA. Comparison between abdominal and hysteroscopic metroplasty. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68(3):399-403.
Colacurci N, De Franciscis P, Mollo A, et al. Small-diameter hysteroscopy with Versapoint versus resectoscopy with a unipolar knife for the treatment of septate uterus: a prospective randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(5):622-7.
Parsanezhad ME, Alborzi S, Zarei A, et al. Hysteroscopic metroplasty of the complete uterine septum, duplicate cervix, and vaginal septum. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(5):1473-7.
Vercellini P, Fedele L, Arcaini L, Rognoni MT, Candiani GB. Value of intrauterine device insertion and estrogen administration after hysteroscopic metroplasty. J Reprod Med. 1989;34(7):447-50.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
