Abordagem da artroplastia total do joelho no Brasil
estudo transversal
Palavras-chave:
Joelho Articulação do joelho, Artroplastia, Prótese do joelho, BrasilResumo
CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: A artroplastia total do joelho (ATJ) evoluiu sobremaneira desde os anos 70, com melhora dos implantes e do instrumental cirúrgico, tornando-se uma intervenção efetiva para o tratamento da artrose do joelho. Muitos estudos apresentam resultados clínicos e radiológicos satisfatórios superiores a 90% no acompanhamento acima de 10 anos. Apesar das evidências científicas sobre sua eficácia da ATJ, a sua abordagem apresenta controvérsias em alguns aspectos. O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar como o ortopedista brasileiro aborda a ATJ e os principais aspectos técnicos na realização deste procedimento. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo transversal, realizado durante o 39o Congresso Brasileiro de Ortopedia e Traumatologia em São Paulo, Brasil, em novembro de 2007. MÉTODOS: Aplicamos um questionário aos ortopedistas inscritos no congresso. A distribuição foi aleatória com adesão voluntária. Foram incluídos 858 questionários para análise. RESULTADOS: A maioria dos Ortopedistas Brasileiros são membros da SBOT e atua na região sudeste. Usam o implante importado, cimentado, por via de acesso anterior centrada na patela, com substituição da superfície articular da patela e preservação do ligamento cruzado posterior e não tem experiência com a artroplastia total bilateral simultânea. No pós-operatório utilizam antibióticos e dreno de sucção por 48 horas. Não houve consenso quanto à profilaxia para tromboembolismo venoso e frequência das principais complicações. CONCLUSÃO: A maioria dos ortopedistas brasileiros trabalha na região sudeste e concorda quanto aos principais aspectos da abordagem da ATJ.
Downloads
Referências
Bozic KJ, Kinder J, Meneghini RM, Zurakowski D, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Implant survivor- ship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(430):117-24.
Rand JA, Ilstrup DM. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(3):397-409.
Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ. Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;(286):94-102.
Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB. Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;(309):136-45.
Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;(345):79-86.
Fuchs R, Mattuella F, Rabello LT. Artroplastia total de joelho: avaliação a médio prazo: dois a dez anos [Total knee arthroplasty: midterm follow-up: two to ten years]. Rev Bras Ortop. 2000;35(3):94-101.
Carvalho Júnior LH, Castro CAC, Gonçalves MBJ, Rodrigues LCM, Lopes FL, Cunha FVP. Com- plicações de curto prazo da artroplastia total do joelho: avaliação de 120 casos [Short- term complications of knee total arthroplasty: evaluation of 120 cases]. Rev Bras Ortop. 2006;41(5):162-6.
Whiteside LA. Cementless total knee replacement. Nine- to 11-year results and 10-year survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;(309):185-92.
Rorabeck CH. Total knee replacement: should it be cemented or hybrid? Can J Surg. 1999;42(1):21-6.
Luzo MVM, Navarro RD, Queiroz AAB, Carneiro Filho M, Souza GA. Artroplastia total do joe- lho. “Whiteside Ortholoc II” sem cimento. Avaliação clínica e radiográfica após dois anos de seguimento [Ortholoc II whiteside cementless total knee arthroplasthy. Clinical and radiolo- gic evaluation after two years of follow-up]. Rev Bras Ortop. 1998;33(2):131-6.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Indicadores sociodemográficos. Prospectivos para o Brasil 1991/2030. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/popu- lacao/projecao_da_populacao/publicacao_UNFPA.pdf. Accessed in 2009 (Jul 29).
Pires RES, Fernandes HJA, Belloti JC, Balbachevsky D, Faloppa F, Reis FB. Como são tratadas as fraturas diafisárias fechadas do fêmur no Brasil? Estudo transversal [How are closed femoral dia- physeal fractures treated in Brazil? A cross-sectional study]. Acta Ortop Bras. 2006;14(3):165-9.
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Entre os melhores do mundo. Jornal da SBOT. 2007;(78):6.
Nakama GY, Peccin MS, Almeida GJM, Lira Neto OA, Navarro RD. Cemented vs cementless in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthrosis and other non-traumatic diseases. (Proto- col). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006193. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006193. Available from: http://mrw.interscience.wiley.com/co- chrane/clsysrev/articles/CD006193/frame.html. Accessed in 2009 (Jul 29).
Ayers DC, Dennis DA, Johanson NA, Pellegrini Jr VD. Instructional Course Lectures, The Ame- rican Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Common complications of total knee arthro- plasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:278-311. Available from: http://www.ejbjs.org/cgi/ reprint/79/2/278. Accessed in 2009 (Jul 29).
Turqueto L, Villardi A, Leite ER, Palma IM, Tejada JVH. Artroplastia total do joelho com e sem substituição da patela [Total knee arthroplasty with and without resurfacing of the patella]. Rev Bras Ortop. 1994;29(5):318-20.
Barbosa REA, Pacheco LRL, Alencar PGC. Influência do grau de artrose femoropatelar no resultado da artroplastia total do joelho, sem o uso do componente patelar [Influence of the femoropatellar osteoarthritis degree on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing]. Rev Bras Ortop. 2003;38(8):446-54.
Nizard RS, Biau D, Porcher R, et al. A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(432):196-203.
Scott RD, Volatile TB. Twelve years’ experience with posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;(205):100-7.
Villardi AM, Veiga LT, Franco JS, et al. Análise da marcha pós-artroplastia total do joelho com e sem preservação do ligamento cruzado posterior [Gait analysis after total knee arthroplasty with and without posterior cruciate ligament preservation]. Rev Bras Ortop. 2005;40(6):316-30.
Jacobs WC, Clement DJ, Wymenga AB. Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(4):CD004803.
Ivory JP, Simpson AH, Toogood GJ, McLardy-Smith PD, Goodfellow JW. Bilateral knee replace- ments: simultaneous or staged? J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1993:38(2):105-7.
Walmsley P, Murray A, Brenkel IJ. The practice of bilateral, simultaneous total knee replace- ment in Scotland over the last decade. Data from the Scottish Arthroplasty Project. Knee. 2006;13(2):102-5.
Reuben JD, Meyers SJ, Cox DD, Elliott M, Watson M, Shim SD. Cost comparison betwe- en bilateral simultaneous, staged, and unilateral total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13(2):172-9.
Brotherton SL, Roberson JR, de Andrade JR, Fleming LL. Staged versus simultaneous bilate- ral total knee replacement. J Arthroplasty. 1986;1(4):221-8.
Buscemi MJ Jr, Page BJ 2nd, Swienckowski J. Unilateral versus bilateral simultaneous arthro- plasties of the lower extremities. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1989;89(9):1133-6.
Morrey BF, Adam RA, Ilstrup DM, Bryan RS. Complications and mortality associated with bilateral or unilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(4):484-8.
Nelson CL, Green TG, Porter RA, Warren RD. One day versus seven days of preventive antibio- tic therapy in orthopedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;(176):258-63.
Mauerhan DR, Nelson CL, Smith DL, et al. Prophylaxis against infection in total joint arthro- plasty. One day of cefuroxime compared with three days of cefazolin. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(1):39-45.
Mestriner LA, Laredo Filho J. Artroplastia total do joelho em osteoartrose [Total knee repla- cement in osteoarthritis]. Rev Bras Ortop. 1993;28(1/2):79-84.
Fauré BT, Benjamin JB, Lindsey B, Volz RG, Schutte D. Comparison of the subvastus and para- median surgical approaches in bilateral knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8(5):511-6.
Bem AAM, Gomes JLE, Marczyk LRS. Abordagens cirúrgicas para artroplastia primária to- tal de joelho [Surgical approaches for primary total knee arthroplasty]. Rev Bras Ortop. 2003;38(11/12):635-44.
Holt BT, Parks NL, Engh GA, Lawrence JM. Comparison of closed-suction drainage and no drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1997;20(12):1121-4; discus- sion 1124-5.
Willemen D, Paul J, White SH, Crook DW. Closed suction drainage following knee arthroplas- ty: Effectiveness and risks. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;(264):232-4.
Minnema B, Vearncombe M, Augustin A, Gollish J, Simor AE. Risk factors for surgical- site infection following primary total knee arthroplasty. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25(6):477-80.
Parker MJ, Livingstone V, Clifton R, McKee A. Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(3):CD001825
Esler CN, Blakeway C, Fiddian NJ. The use of a closed-suction drain in total knee arthroplas- ty. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(2):215-7.
Westrich GH, Haas SB, Mosca P, Peterson M. Meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(6):795-800.
Grady-Benson JC, Oishi CS, Hanson PB, Colwell CW Jr, Otis SM, Walker RH. Postoperative surveillance for deep venous thrombosis with duplex ultrasonography after total knee ar- throplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(11):1649-57.
Garino JP, Lotke PA, Kitziger KJ, Steinberg ME. Deep venous thrombosis after total joint arthroplasty. The role of compression ultrasonography and the importance of the experience of the technician. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(9):1359-65.
Ansari S, Warwick D, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH. Incidence of fatal pulmonary embolism after 1,390 knee arthroplasties without routine prophylactic anticoagulation, except in high-risk cases. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12(6):599-602.
Muoneke HE, Khan AM, Giannikas KA, Hägglund E, Dunningham TH. Secondary resurfacing of the patella for persistent anterior knee pain after primary knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(5):675-8.
Tsukayama DT, Gustilo R. Infected total knee arthroplasty. In: Fu FH, Harner CD, Vince KG, editors. Knee surgery. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994. p. 1563-72.
Kim S, Losina E, Solomon DH, Wright J, Katz JN. Effectiveness of clinical pathways for total knee and total hip arthroplasty: literature review. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(1):69-74.
Merkow RL, Soudry M, Insall JN. Patellar dislocation following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(9):1321-7.
Mochizuki RM, Schurman DJ. Patellar complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(6A):879-83.
Malo M, Vince KG. The unstable patella after total knee arthroplasty: etiology, prevention, and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11(5):364-71.
Lewonowski K, Dorr LD, McPherson EJ, Huber G, Wan Z. Medialization of the patella in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12(2):161-7.
Idusuyi OB, Morrey BF. Peroneal nerve palsy after total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of predisposing and prognostic factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(2):177-84.
Mont MA, Dellon AL, Chen F, Hungerford MW, Krackow KA, Hungerford DS. The operative treatment of peroneal nerve palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(6):863-9.
Place where the work was presented: Twelfth Brazilian Congress of Knee Surgery, in Florianópolis, State of Santa Catarina, on April 19, 2008.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
