Use of CentriMag for refractory cardiogenic shock in a puerperal woman
case report
Palavras-chave:
Heart failure, Heart-assist devices, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, MyocarditisResumo
CONTEXT: Heart failure in Brazil is a major public health problem and, even with advances in treatment, it still presents high morbidity and mortality. As a treatment option, mechanical circulatory assist devices (MCADs) have greatly increased in importance over the last decade. CASE REPORT: This report concerns a case of refractory cardiogenic shock due to acute myocarditis in a 35-year-old puerperal female patient who presented with retrosternal pain, fatigue and dyspnea. At the hospital, she was diagnosed with myocarditis. There was no improvement in perfusion even after receiving dobutamine, intra-aortic balloon passage (IAB) and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Therefore, it was decided to implant a MCAD (CentriMag). During hospitalization, recovery from the bi-ventricular dysfunction was achieved. The CentriMag device was removed 10 days after it had been implanted, and the patient was discharged after another 8 days. The myocarditis was proven to be due to the Coxsackie virus. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to implant a MCAD should be individualized, as patient profiles do not always match the indications in the guidelines and protocols. In this study, clinical discussion of the case among the medical and multi-professional teams was essential in order to be able to successfully reverse the patient’s severe clinical condition without sequelae, through using a CentriMag implant.
Downloads
Referências
Ambrosy AP, Fonarow GC, Butler J, et al. The Global Health and Economic Burden of Hospitalizations for Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(12):1123-33. PMID: 24491689; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.053.
Ciapponi A, Alcaraz A, Calderón M, et al. Burden of Heart Failure in Latin America: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016;69(11):1051-60. PMID: 27553287; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2016.04.054.
Ministério da Saúde. DATASUS - Ocorrência de óbitos por Categoria CID-10 I50 segundo Ano do Óbito - 2017. Available from: Available from: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sim/cnv/obt10uf.def Accessed in 2021 (Feb 18).
Ayub-Ferreira S, Souza Neto J, Almeida D, et al. Diretriz de Assistência Circulatória Mecânica da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016;107(2 Suppl 2):1-33. PMID: 27627754; http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20160128
Peura JL, Colvin-Adams M, Francis GS, et al. Recommendations for the use of mechanical circulatory support: Device strategies and patient selection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;126(22):2648-67. PMID: 23109468; https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182769a54.
Fiorelli AI, Oliveira Júnior JL, Coelho GHB, Rocha DC. Assistência circulatória mecânica: porquê e quando [Mechanical circulatory support: why and when]. Rev Med (São Paulo). 2008;87(1):1-15. Available from: Available from: https://www.revistas.usp.br/revistadc/article/view/59055/62042 Accessed in 2021 (Feb 18).
Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL, et al. Third INTERMACS Annual Report: the evolution of destination therapy in the United States. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30(2):115-23. PMID: 21215378; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2010.12.001.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.