Caraterísticas clínicas de mulheres com diabetes gestacional — uma comparação de duas coortes arroladas em intervalo de 20 anos no sul do Brasil

Autores

  • Angela Jacob Reichelt Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
  • Letícia Schwerz Weinert Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
  • Livia Silveira Mastella Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
  • Vanessa Gnielka Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
  • Maria Amélia Campos Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
  • Vânia Naomi Hirakata Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
  • Maria Lúcia Rocha Oppermann Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
  • Sandra Pinho Silveiro Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
  • Maria Inês Schmidt Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Palavras-chave:

Diabetes gestacional, Gravidez, Diagnóstico, Complicações na gravidez, Recém-nascido

Resumo

CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Prevalência e características do diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG) modificaram-se com o tempo, refletindo transição nutricional e diferentes critérios diagnósticos. Nosso objetivo foi avaliar características de gestações com DMG em intervalo de 20 anos. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Comparação de duas coortes gestacionais arroladas em diferentes períodos, em hospitais universitários de Porto Alegre, Brasil: 1991 a 1993 (n = 216) e 2009 a 2013 (n = 375). MÉTODOS: Aplicamos dois critérios diagnósticos às coortes: International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG)/Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS); e National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Comparamos características e desfechos materno-fetais entre as coortes e dentro de cada uma. RESULTADOS: Na coorte dos anos 2010, as mulheres eram mais velhas (31 ± 7 versus 30 ± 6 anos), obesas (29,4% versus 15,2%), apresentaram mais distúrbios hipertensivos (14,1% versus 5,6%) e risco aumentado de cesariana (risco relativo ajustado 1,8; intervalo de confiança de 95% 1,4 - 2,3), comparadas às da coorte de 1990. Desfechos neonatais, como categoria do peso ao nascer e hipoglicemia, foram semelhantes. Na coorte de 1990, essas características e desfechos foram semelhantes nas mulheres que preenchiam apenas um dos critérios; na de 2010, mulheres diagnosticadas apenas pelo IADPSG/OMS eram mais obesas (33 ± 8 kg/m2 versus 28 ± 6 kg/m2, P < 0,001) do que as diagnosticadas apenas pelo NICE. CONCLUSÃO: A epidemia de obesidade parece ter modificado o perfil de mulheres com DMG. Embora desfechos neonatais sejam semelhantes, houve diferenças na intensidade de tratamento ao longo do tempo. O critério da IADPSG/OMS parece identificar um perfil mais associado à obesidade.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Angela Jacob Reichelt, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

MD, PhD. Physician, Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.

Letícia Schwerz Weinert, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

MD, PhD. Postgraduate Medical Sciences Program on Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.

Livia Silveira Mastella, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

MD, MSc. Postgraduate Student, Postgraduate Medical Sciences Program on Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.

Vanessa Gnielka, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Medical Student, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre (RS) Brazil.

Maria Amélia Campos, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

MSc. Statistician, Biostatistics Unit, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.

Vânia Naomi Hirakata, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

MSc. Statistician, Biostatistics Unit, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.

Maria Lúcia Rocha Oppermann, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

MD, PhD. Professor, Postgraduate Program on Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.

Sandra Pinho Silveiro, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

MD, PhD. Professor, Postgraduate Medical Sciences Program on Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.

Maria Inês Schmidt, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

MD, PhD. Professor, Postgraduate Program on Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.

Referências

World Health Organization. Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy. Geneva: World Healt Organization; 2013. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85975/1/WHO_NMH_MND_13.2_eng.pdf Accessed in 2017 (Apr 18).

Reichelt AJ, Oppermann MLR. Gestational diabetes diagnosis landmarks. A timeline. Available from: http://www.ufrgs.br/napead/repositorio/objetos/diabetes-gestacional/ Accessed in 2017 (Apr 18).

Reichelt AJ, Oppermann MLR, Schmidt MI. Recomendações da 2a reunião do grupo de trabalho em diabetes e gravidez [Guidelines of the 2nd meeting of the diabetes and pregnancy task force]. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2002;46(5):574-81.

Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Reichelt AJ, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed with a 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(7):1151-5.

Kanguru L, Bezawada N, Hussein J, Bell J. The burden of diabetes mellitus during pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Glob Health Action. 2014;7:23987.

Schneider S, Bock C, Wetzel M, Maul H, Loerbroks A. The prevalence of gestational diabetes in advanced economies. J Perinat Med. 2012;40(5):511-20.

Colagiuri S, Falavigna M, Agarwal MM, et al. Strategies for implementing the WHO diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103(3):364-72.

National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK). Diabetes in Pregnancy: Management of Diabetes and Its Complications from Preconception to the Postnatal Period. London: RCOG Press; 2015.

American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014. Diabetes Care. 2014;37 Suppl 1:S14-80.

Salzberg S, Alvariñas J, López G, et al. Guías de diagnóstico y tratamiento de diabetes gestacional. ALAD 2016. Revista de la ALAD. 2016;6:155-69. Available from: http://www.diabetes.org.ar/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/PUBLICACION-GUIAS-DG-alad_v6_n4_155-169-4.pdf Accessed in 2017 (Apr 18).

WHO Expert Committee on Diabetes Mellitus: second report. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1980;646:1-80.

Ministério da Educação (MEC). Secretaria de Educação Superior (SESu). Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). Prestação de Contas Ordinárias Anual. Relatório de Gestão do Exercício de 2013. Porto Alegre; 2014. Available from: http://www.hcpa.edu.br/downloads/Publicacoes/relatorio_gestao_hcpa_2013.pdf Accessed in 2017 (Apr 18).

Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995;854:1-452.

Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington: National Academies Press; 2009.

Tranquilli AL, Dekker G, Magee L, et al. The classification, diagnosis and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A revised statement from the ISSHP. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2014;4(2):97-104.

Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(2):163-8.

International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) Working Group on Outcome Definitions, Feig DS, Corcoy R, et al. Diabetes in pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and proposed codification of definitions. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2015;31(7):680-90.

Human Development Report 2015. Human Development Report 2015. Work for Human Development. New York: United Nations Development Programme; 2015. Available from: https://s3.amazonaws.com/hdr2015report/2015_human_development_report.pdf. Accessed in 2017 (Apr 18).

Victora CG, Barreto ML, do Carmo Leal M, et al. Health conditions and health-policy innovations in Brazil: the way forward. Lancet. 2011;377(9782):2042-53.

NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1377-96.

Godfrey KM, Reynolds RM, Prescott SL, et al. Influence of maternal obesity on the long-term health of offspring. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(1):53-64.

Catalano PM, McIntyre HD, Cruickshank JK, et al. The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study: associations of GDM and obesity with pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(4):780-6.

Zhu Y, Zhang C. Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes and Risk of Progression to Type 2 Diabetes: a Global Perspective. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;16(1):7.

Trujillo J, Vigo A, Duncan BB, et al. Impact of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria for gestational diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;108(2):288-95.

Egan AM, Heerey AM, Carmody L, Dunne FP. The changing diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: does anyone miss out? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;106(3):e53-5.

Zhu W, Yang H, Wei Y, et al. Comparing the diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus of World Health Organization 2013 with 1999 in Chinese population. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015;128(1):125-7.

Sagili H, Kamalanathan S, Sahoo J, et al. Comparison of different criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;19(6):824-8.

Meek CL, Lewis HB, Patient C, Murphy HR, Simmons D. Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: falling through the net. Diabetologia. 2015;58(9):2003-12.

Harreiter J, Simmons D, Desoye G, et al. IADPSG and WHO 2013 Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Criteria Identify Obese Women With Marked Insulin Resistance in Early Pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(7):e90-2.

NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1513-30.

Downloads

Publicado

2017-08-03

Como Citar

1.
Reichelt AJ, Weinert LS, Mastella LS, Gnielka V, Campos MA, Hirakata VN, Oppermann MLR, Silveiro SP, Schmidt MI. Caraterísticas clínicas de mulheres com diabetes gestacional — uma comparação de duas coortes arroladas em intervalo de 20 anos no sul do Brasil. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 3º de agosto de 2017 [citado 14º de março de 2025];135(4):376-82. Disponível em: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/805

Edição

Seção

Artigo Original