Determination of a cutoff value for pelvic floor distensibility using the Epi-no balloon to predict perineal integrity in vaginal delivery

ROC curve analysis. Prospective observational single cohort study

Authors

  • Miriam Raquel Diniz Zanetti Hospital e Maternidade Amador Aguiar
  • Carla Dellabarba Petricelli Hospital e Maternidade Amador Aguiar
  • Sandra Maria Alexandre Hospital e Maternidade Amador Aguiar
  • Aline Paschoal Hospital e Maternidade Amador Aguiar
  • Edward Araujo Júnior Hospital e Maternidade Amador Aguiar
  • Mary Uchiyama Nakamura Hospital e Maternidade Amador Aguiar

Keywords:

Physical therapy modalities, Pelvic floor, Perineum, Labor stage, first, Parturition

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Several risk factors are involved in perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery. However, little is known about the influence of perineal distensibility as a protective factor. The aim here was to determine a cutoff value for pelvic floor distensibility measured using the Epi-no balloon, which could be used as a predictive factor for perineal integrity in vaginal delivery. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational single cohort study conducted in a maternity hospital. METHODS: A convenience sample of 227 consecutive at-term parturients was used. All women had a single fetus in the vertex presentation, with up to 9.0 cm of dilation. The maximum dilation of the Epi-no balloon was measured using a tape measure after it had been inflated inside the vagina up to the parturients’ maximum tolerance. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to obtain the Epi-no circumference measurement with best sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Among the 161 patients who were included in the study, 50.9% underwent episiotomy, 21.8% presented lacerations and 27.3% retained an intact perineum. Age > 25.9 years; number of pregnancies > 3.4; number of deliveries > 2.2 and circumference measured by Epi-no > 21.4 cm were all directly correlated with an intact perineum. Circumference measurements using the Epi-no balloon that were greater than 20.8 cm showed sensitivity and specificity of 70.5% and 66.7% (area under curve = 0.713), respectively, as a predictive factor for an intact perineum in vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: Circumferences greater than 20.8 cm achieved using the Epi-no balloon are a predictive factor for perineal integrity in parturients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Miriam Raquel Diniz Zanetti, Hospital e Maternidade Amador Aguiar

PhD. Voluntary Physiotherapist, Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

Carla Dellabarba Petricelli, Hospital e Maternidade Amador Aguiar

MSc. Voluntary Physiotherapist, Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

Sandra Maria Alexandre, Hospital e Maternidade Amador Aguiar

PhD. Adjunct Professor, Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

Aline Paschoal, Hospital e Maternidade Amador Aguiar

BSc. Postgraduate Student, Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

Edward Araujo Júnior, Hospital e Maternidade Amador Aguiar

PhD. Associate Professor, Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

Mary Uchiyama Nakamura, Hospital e Maternidade Amador Aguiar

PhD. Associate Professor, Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil.

References

Yiou R, Costa P, Haab F, Delmas V. Anatomie fonctionnelle du plancher pelvien [Functional anatomy of the pelvic floor]. Prog Urol. 2009;19(13):916-25.

Shek KL, Dietz HP. Intrapartum risk factors for levator trauma. BJOG. 2010;117(12):1485-92.

World Health Organization. Classification of practices in normal birth. Geneva: In: World Health Organization: Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Report a technical working group. Report No.: WHO Technical Report Series FRH/MSM/96.24; 1996. p. 34-7. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1996/WHO_FRH_MSM_96.24.pdf?ua=1. Accessed in 2014 (Aug 15).

Shek KL, Dietz HP. The effect of childbirth on hiatal dimensions. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(6):1272-8.

Dietz HP, Lanzarone V. Levator trauma after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(4):707-12.

Dietz HP, Shek C, De Leon J, Steensma AB. Ballooning of the levator hiatus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(6):676-80.

Labrecque M, Eason E, Marcoux S. Women’s views on the practice of prenatal perineal massage. BJOG. 2001;108(5):499-504.

Howard D, Davies PS, DeLancey JO, Small Y. Differences in perineal lacerations in black and white primiparas. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(4):622-4.

Goldberg RP, Kwon C, Gandhi S, et al. Urinary incontinence among mothers of multiples: the protective effect of cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(6):1447-50; discussion 1450-3.

Burgio KL, Borello-France D, Richter HE, et al. Risk factors for fecal and urinary incontinence after childbirth: the childbirth and pelvic symptoms study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):1998-2004.

Ashton-Miller JA, Delancey JO. On the biomechanics of vaginal birth and common sequelae. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;13:163-76.

Kovacs GT, Heath P, Heather C. First Australian trial of the birth- training device Epi-No: a highly significantly increased chance of an intact perineum. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44(4):347-8.

Kubotani JS, Moron AF, Araujo Júnior E, et al. Perineal Distensibility Using Epi-no in Twin Pregnancies: Comparative Study with Singleton Pregnancies. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2014;2014:124206.

Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, et al. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(3):868-74.

Ruckhäberle E, Jundt K, Bäuerle M, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre trial with the birth trainer EPI-NO for the prevention of perineal trauma. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49(5):478-83.

Martins WP, Lima JC, Welsh AW, et al. Three-dimensional Doppler evaluation of single spherical samples from the placenta: intra- and interobserver reliability. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(2):200-6.

Rodriguez A, Arenas EA, Osorio AL, Mendez O, Zuleta JJ. Selective vs routine midline episiotomy for the prevention of third- or fourth- degree lacerations in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(3):285.e1-4.

Astrand PO, Rodahl K. Textbook of work physiology: physiological bases of exercise. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1977.

Shek KL, Dietz HP. Can levator avulsion be predicted antenatally? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(6):586.e1-6.

Vershinin AE, Nazarenko GF. Uglomer dlia opredeleniia amplitudy dvizhenii v sheinom otdele pozvonochnika [Goniometer for determining the amplitude of motion in the cervical spine]. Ortop Travmatol Protez. 1986;(9):49-50.

Bracken JN, Dryfhout VL, Goldenhar LM, Pauls RN. Preferences and concerns for delivery: an antepartum survey. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(11):1527-31.

Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (Brasil). O modelo de atenção obstétrica no setor de Saúde Suplementar no Brasil: cenários e perspectivas/Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar. Rio de Janeiro: ANS; 2008. Available from: www.ans.gov.br/portal/upload/biblioteca/livro_parto_web.pdf. Accessed in 2014 (Aug 15).

Shek KL, Chantarasorn V, Langer S, Phipps H, Dietz HP. Does the Epi- No Birth Trainer reduce levator trauma? A randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(12):1521-8.

Dietz HP, Shek C. Levator avulsion and grading of pelvic floor muscle strength. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(5):633-6.

Nicoll LM, Skupski DW. Venous air embolism after using a birth- training device. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(2 Pt 2):489-91.

Lien KC, Mooney B, DeLancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA. Levator ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(1):31-40.

Hoyte L, Damaser MS, Warfield SK, et al. Quantity and distribution of levator ani stretch during simulated vaginal childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(2):198.e1-5.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-07

How to Cite

1.
Zanetti MRD, Petricelli CD, Alexandre SM, Paschoal A, Araujo Júnior E, Nakamura MU. Determination of a cutoff value for pelvic floor distensibility using the Epi-no balloon to predict perineal integrity in vaginal delivery: ROC curve analysis. Prospective observational single cohort study. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2016 Apr. 7 [cited 2025 Oct. 15];134(2):97-102. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1008

Issue

Section

Original Article