Cutoffs and cardiovascular risk factors associated with neck circumference among community-dwelling elderly adults
a cross-sectional study
Keywords:
Anthropometry, Blood pressure, Obesity, Aged, Primary health careAbstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: In elderly people, measurement of several anthropometric parameters may present complications. Although neck circumference measurements seem to avoid these issues, the cutoffs and cardiovascular risk factors associated with this parameter among elderly people remain unknown. This study was developed to identify the cutoff values and cardiovascular risk factors associated with neck circumference measurements among elderly people. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study conducted in two community centers for elderly people. METHODS: 435 elderly adults (371 women and 64 men) were recruited. These volunteers underwent morphological evaluations (body mass index and waist, hip, and neck circumferences) and hemodynamic evaluations (blood pressure values and heart rate). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to determine the predictive validity of cutoff values for neck circumference, for identifying overweight/obesity. Multivariate analysis was used to identify cardiovascular risk factors associated with large neck circumference. RESULTS: Cutoff values for neck circumference (men = 40.5 cm and women = 35.7 cm), for detection of obese older adults according to body mass index, were identified. After a second analysis, large neck circumference was shown to be associated with elevated body mass index in men; and elevated body mass index, blood pressure values, prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension in women. CONCLUSION: The data indicate that neck circumference can be used as a screening tool to identify overweight/obesity in older people. Moreover, large neck circumference values may be associated with cardiovascular risk factors.
Downloads
References
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2015). World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241. Available from: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/publications/files/key_findings_wpp_2015.pdf. Accessed in 2016 (Oct 11).
Coelho Júnior HJ, Aguiar S da S, Gonçalves I de O, et al. Sarcopenia Is Associated with High Pulse Pressure in Older Women. J Aging Res. 2015;2015:109824.
Sewo Sampaio PY, Sampaio RA, Coelho Júnior HJ, et al. Differences in lifestyle, physical performance and quality of life between frail and robust Brazilian community-dwelling elderly women. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;16(7):829-35.
Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(3):399-410.
Solé-Auró A, Michaud PC, Hurd M, Crimmins E. Disease incidence and mortality among older Americans and Europeans. Demography. 2015;52(2):593-611.
World Health Organization. World health statistics 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/170250/1/9789240694439_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1. Accessed in 2016 (Oct 11).
Fakhouri TH, Ogden CL, Carrol MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity among older adults in the United States, 2007-2010. NCHS Data Brief no 106. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db106.pdf. Accessed in 2016 (Oct 11).
Kelly T, Yang W, Chen CS, Reynolds K, He J. Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(9): 1431-7.
Dixon JB. The effect of obesity on health outcomes. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010;316(2):104-8.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção da Saúde. Vigitel Brasil 2014: vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico/ Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção da Saúde. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2015. Available from: http://bvsms. saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/vigitel_brasil_2014.pdf. Accessed in 2016 (Oct 11).
Sakuma K, Yamaguchi A. Sarcopenic obesity and endocrinal adaptation with age. Int J Endocrinol. 2013;2013:204164.
Ben-Noun L, Laor A. Relationship of neck circumference to cardiovascular risk factors. Obes Res. 2003;11(2):226-31.
Ben-Noun L, Sohar E, Laor A. Neck circumference as a simple screening measure for identifying overweight and obese patients. Obes Res. 2001;9(8):470-7.
Lou DH, Yin FZ, Wang R, et al. Neck circumference is an accurate and simple index for evaluating overweight and obesity in Han children. Ann Hum Biol. 2012;39(2):161-5.
Nafiu OO, Burke C, Lee J, et al. Neck circumference as a screening measure for identifying children with high body mass index. Pediatrics. 2010;126(2):e306-10.
Nafiu OO, Burke CC, Gupta R, et al. Association of neck circumference with perioperative adverse respiratory events in children. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5):e1198-205.
Preis SR, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, et al. Neck circumference as a novel measure of cardiometabolic risk: the Framingham Heart study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(8):3701-10.
Gonçalves VSS, Faria ER, Franceschini SCC, Priore SE. Perímetro do pescoço como preditor de excesso de gordura corporal e fatores de risco cardiovascular em adolescentes [Neck circumference as predictor of excess body fat and cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents]. Rev Nutr. 2014;27(2):161-71.
Hatipoglu N, Mazicioglu MM, Kurtoglu S, Kendirci M. Neck circumference: an additional tool of screening overweight and obesity in childhood. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169(6):733-9.
Baena CP, Lotufo PA, Fonseca MG, et al. Neck Circumference Is Independently Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Cross-Sectional Analysis from ELSA-Brasil. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2016;14(3):145-53.
Stabe C, Vasques AC, Lima MM, et al. Neck circumference as a simple tool for identifying the metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance: results from the Brazilian Metabolic Syndrome Study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf ). 2013;78(6):874-81.
Corona LP, Pereira de Brito TR, Nunes DP, et al. Nutritional status and risk for disability in instrumental activities of daily living in older Brazilians. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(2):390-5.
World Health Organization. Waist circumference and waist- hip ratio: report of a WHO expert consultation. Geneva, 8-11 December 2008. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44583/1/9789241501491_eng.pdf. Accessed in 2016 (Oct 11).
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560-72.
Cuckson AC, Reinders A, Shabeeh H, Shennan AH; British Hypertension Society. Validation of the Microlife BP 3BTO-A oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2002;7(6):319-24.
Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med. 1997;16(9):965-80.
Raitakari OT, Juonala M, Viikari JS. Obesity in childhood and vascular changes in adulthood: insights into the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005;29 Suppl 2:S101-4.
Jamar G, Pisani LP, Oyama LM, et al. Is the neck circumference an emergent predictor for inflammatory status in obese adults? Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67(3):217-24.
Baena CP, Lotufo PA, Santos IS, et al. Neck circumference is associated with carotid intimal-media thickness but not with coronary artery calcium: Results from the ELSA-Brasil. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;26(3):216-22.
Jensen MD. Gender differences in regional fatty acid metabolism before and after meal ingestion. J Clin Invest. 1995;96(5):2297-303.
Votruba SB, Jensen MD. Regional fat deposition as a factor in FFA metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr. 2007;27:149-63.