Ground reaction force in basketball cutting maneuvers with and without ankle bracing and taping
Keywords:
Biomechanics, Ankle, Movement, Kinetics, Motor activity, BasketballAbstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: In basketball, the most common injuries are ankle sprains. For this reason, players frequently use external ankle devices or taping as prophylactic and rehabilita- tion measures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ground reaction force (GRF) responses in basketball players while performing typical cutting maneuvers with and without ankle bracing and ankle taping. DESIGN AND SETTING: Comparative study with experimental design of single-group repeated measurements, at Medical Rehabilitation Divi- sion, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo. METHODS: Vertical (Fy) and medial-lateral (Fz) GRF measurements were made under three condi- tions (taping, Aircast-type orthosis and basketball shoes alone), with analysis of peak forces at foot contact (Fymax1, Fzmax1, Fymax2 and Fzmax2), growth gradient (peak/time) (GG Fymax1, GG Fzmax1, GG Fymax2 and GG Fzmax2) and impulse after foot contact. RESULTS: Bracing significantly reduced Fymax2 and GG Fymax2. GG Fzmax1 was significantly higher for the sport shoe condition than for the taping condition. Taping increased Fy in relation to the sport shoe at foot contact, but over a longer time interval, without increasing excessive ankle loading. Fz reached a peak in less time, which might generate greater inversion/eversion loading on a player’s foot. The Aircast exerted better shock-absorbing ef- fect than did the other two conditions, since it generated less vertical force over longer time intervals and smaller medial-lateral forces in relation to taping. CONCLUSIONS: Ankle bracing and ankle taping action mechanisms are still unclear and therefore should be carefully prescribed. More studies are needed to clarify taping and bracing effects on sporting activities.
Downloads
References
Parkkari J, Kujala UM, Kannus P. Is it possible to prevent sports injuries? Review of controlled clinical trials and recommenda- tions for future work. Sports Med. 2001;31(14):985-95.
McKay GD, Goldie PA, Payne WR, Oakes BW. Ankle injuries in basketball: injury rate and risk factors. Br J Sports Med. 2001;35(2):103-8.
Callaghan MJ. Role of ankle taping and bracing in the athlete. Br J Sports Med. 1997;31(2):102-8.
Burks RT, Bean BG, Marcus R, Barker HB. Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19(2):104-6.
MacKean LC, Bell G, Burnham RS. Prophylactic ankle bracing vs. taping: effects on functional performance in female basketball players. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;22(2):77-81.
Hals TM, Sitler MR, Mattacola CG. Effect of a semi-rigid ankle stabilizer on performance in persons with functional ankle instability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30(9):552-6.
Verbrugge JD. The effects of semirigid Air-Stirrup bracing vs. adhesive ankle taping on motor performance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;23(5):320-5.
Perrin PP, Bene MC, Perrin CA, Durupt D. Ankle trauma significantly impairs posture control--a study in basketball players and controls. Int J Sports Med. 1997;18(5):387-92.
Cordova ML, Armstrong CW, Rankin JM, Yeasting RA. Ground reaction forces and EMG activity with ankle brac- ing during inversion stress. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30(9):1363-70.
Karlsson J, Andreasson GO. The effect of external ankle support in the chronic lateral ankle joint instability. An eletromyographic study. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(3):257-61.
Geyer M, Siebert WE. Komplexe Bewegungsanalyse: dyna- mische Untersuchung zum Effekt des Tapeverbandes auf die Pronation beim Hochsprung mit dreidimensionaler Bewe- gungsanalyse und Elektromyographie. [Complex movement analysis: dynamic study of the effect of a tape bandage on pronation in high-jumping with three-dimensional movement analysis and electromyography]. Sportverletz Sportschaden. 1991;5(2):103-7.
Canavan PK. Rehabilitation in Sports Medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 1998.
Hamill J, Knutzen KM, Bates BT, Kirkpatrick G. Evaluation of two ankle appliances using ground reaction force data. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1986;7(5):244-9.
McIntyre DR, Smith MA, Denniston NL. The effectiveness of strapping techniques during prolonged dynamic exercises. J Athl Train. 1983;18:52-5.
Riemann BL, Schmitz RJ, Gale M, McCaw ST. Effect of ankle taping and bracing on vertical ground reaction forces during drop landings before and after treadmill jogging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32(12):628-35.
Caulfield B, Garrett M. Changes in ground reaction force during jump landing in subjects with functional instability of the ankle joint. Clin Biomec (Bristol, Avon). 2004; 19(6):617-21.
Houck J. Muscle activation patterns of selected lower extrem- ity muscles during stepping and cutting tasks. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003;13(6):545-54.
Baptista CA, Filho JA, Andrade BJ. Exame clínico geral pré- participação. In: Ghorayeb N, Barros T, editors. O exercício. São Paulo: Atheneu; 1999. p. 51-8.
Ribeiro CZP, Akashi PMH, Sacco ICN, Pedrinelli A. Relation- ship between postural changes and injuries of the locomotor system in indoor soccer athletes. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2003;9(2):98-103.
Fu FH, Stone DA. Sports injuries: mechanisms, prevention, treatment. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994.
Konradsen L, Olesen S, Hansen HM. Ankle sensorimotor control and eversion strength after acute ankle inversion injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(1):72-7.
Safran MR, Benedetti RS, Bartolozzi AR 3rd, Mandelbaum BR. Lateral ankle sprains: a comprehensive review. part 1: etiology, pathoanatomy, histopathogenesis, and diagnosis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(7Suppl):S429-37.
Hockenbury RT, Sammarco GJ. Evaluation and treatment of ankle sprains. Clinical recommendations for a positive outcome. Phys Sportsmed. 2001;29(2):569-81.
Kaikkonen A, Kannus P, Järvinen M. A performance test protocol and scoring scale for the evaluation of ankle injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(4):462-9.
Ferreira PH. A eficácia de tornozeleiras e bandagens funcionais no controle do equilíbrio dinâmico. In: Anais. VII Congresso Brasileiro de Biomecânica; 1997, Mai 23-26, Campinas; 1997. p. 407-12.
Roesler CRM, Iturrioz I. Identificação do conteúdo de freqüências presente na força de reação do solo medida com plataforma de forças. [Frequency present in reaction force of the floor measure with force platform]. Rev Bras Biomec. 2002;3(4):51-6.
McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Fisiologia do exercício: energia, nutrição e desempenho humano. 4a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 1998.
McKay GD, Goldie PA, Payne WR, Oakes BW, Watson LF. A prospective study of injuries in basketball: a total profile and comparison by gender and standard of competition. J Sci Med Sports. 2001;4(2):196-211.
Anderson DL, Sanderson DJ, Hennig EM. The role of external nonrigid ankle bracing in limiting ankle inversion. Clin J Sports Med. 1995;5(1):18-24.
Hume PA, Gerrard DF. Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union. Sports Med. 1998;25(5):285-312.