The patient-physician interactions as seen by undergraduate medical students

Authors

  • Leandro Yoshinobu Kiyohara Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Lilian Kakumu Kayano Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Marcelo Luís Teixeira Kobayashi Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Mariana Sisto Alessi Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Marina Uemori Yamamoto
  • Paulo Roberto Miziara Yunes-Filho Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Rodrigo Rodrigues Pessoa Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Rosana Mandelbaum Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Silvio Tanaka Okubo Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Thais Watanuki Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Joaquim Edson Vieira Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Keywords:

Patient-physician interaction, Patient satisfaction, Teaching, Questionnaires

Abstract

CONTEXT: The interaction between a physician and his or her patient is complex and occurs by means of technical performance and through a personal relationship. OBJECTIVE: To assess the interaction between the medical professional and his or her patient with the participation of medical students assuming a role as observers and participants in a medical appointment in an outpatient office. DESIGN: Questionnaire interview study. SETTING: General Medicine outpatient offices, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo. PARTICIPANTS: Medical students performed an ethnographical technique of observation, following 199 outpatient medical appointments with Clinical Medicine Residents. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: A questionnaire filled out by observer students measured the physician’s attitudes towards patients, as well as patients’ expectations regarding the appointment and his or her understanding after its completion. RESULTS: Patients showed higher enthusiasm after the appointment (4.47 ± 0.06 versus 2.62 ± 0.10) (mean ± SEM), as well as some negative remarks such as in relation to the waiting time. The time spent in the consultation was 24.66 ± 4.45 minutes (mean ± SEM) and the waiting time was 123.09 ± 4.91 minutes. The physician’s written orientation was fairly well recalled by the patient when the doctor’s letter could be previously understood. CONCLUSION: Patients benefit from physicians who keep the focus on them. In addition, this program stimulated the students for their accomplishment of the medical course.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Leandro Yoshinobu Kiyohara, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Undergraduate Students, Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Lilian Kakumu Kayano, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Undergraduate Students, Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Marcelo Luís Teixeira Kobayashi, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Undergraduate Students, Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Mariana Sisto Alessi, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Undergraduate Students, Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Marina Uemori Yamamoto

Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Paulo Roberto Miziara Yunes-Filho, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Undergraduate Students, Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Rodrigo Rodrigues Pessoa, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Undergraduate Students, Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Rosana Mandelbaum, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Undergraduate Students, Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Silvio Tanaka Okubo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Undergraduate Students, Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Thais Watanuki, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Undergraduate Students, Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Joaquim Edson Vieira, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

MD, PhD. Anesthesiology Division, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

References

Donabedian A. The Quality of Medical Care. Methods for assessing and monitoring the quality of care for research and for quality assurance programs. Science 1978;200:856-64.

Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician perform- ance. JAMA 1993;269:1655-60.

Wright SM, Kern DE, Kolodner K, Howard DM, Brancati FL. Attributes of excellent attending-physician role models. N Eng J Med 1998;339:1986-93.

Boulos M. Relação médico-paciente: o ponto de vista do clínico (Doctor-patient relationship: the general practitioner’s point of view). In: Marcondes E, Gonçalves EL. Educação Médica. São Paulo: Editora Sarvier; 1998.

Babbie ER. The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, Califor- nia: Wadsworth Publishing Co. Inc.; 1979.

Lochman JE. Factors related to patients’ satisfaction with their medical care. J Community Health 1983;9:91-109.

Robbins JA, Bertakis KD, Helms LJ, Azari R, Callahan EJ, Creten DA. The influence of physician practice behaviors on patient satisfaction. Fam Med 1993;25:17-20.

Gross DA, Zyzanski SJ, Borawski, EA, Cebul RD, Stange KC. Patient satisfaction with time spent with their physician. J Fam Pract 1998;47:133-7.

White B. Measuring Patient Satisfaction: how to do it and why to bother. Fam Pract Manag, January 1999. www.aafp.org.

Rashid A, Forman W, Jagger C, Mann R. Consultations in gen- eral practice: a comparison of patients’ and doctors’ satisfac- tion. BMJ 1989;299:1015-6.

Hall JA, Stein TS, Roter DL, Rieser N. Inaccuracies in physi- cians’ perceptions of their patients. Med Care 1999;37:1164-8.

Mabeck CE, Olesen F. Metaphorically transmitted diseases. How do patients embody medical explanations? Fam Pract 1997;14:271-8.

Wartman SA, Morlock LL, Malitz FE, Palm EA. Patient under- standing and satisfaction as predictors of compliance. Med Care 1983;21:886-91.

Downloads

Published

2001-05-05

How to Cite

1.
Kiyohara LY, Kayano LK, Kobayashi MLT, Alessi MS, Yamamoto MU, Yunes-Filho PRM, Pessoa RR, Mandelbaum R, Okubo ST, Watanuki T, Vieira JE. The patient-physician interactions as seen by undergraduate medical students. Sao Paulo Med J [Internet]. 2001 May 5 [cited 2025 Mar. 14];119(3):97-100. Available from: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/2756

Issue

Section

Original Article